Wang Stephanie J, Kidder Wesley, Joseph Nancy M, Le Bryan Khuong, Lindsay Sheila, Moon Farhana, Nakakura Eric K, Zhang Li, Bergsland Emily K
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2025 Jan 30;32(3). doi: 10.1530/ERC-24-0203. Print 2025 Mar 1.
Grade progression of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) can occur over time, with G1/2 to G3 being the most clinically relevant form. Here, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 66 patients with initially G1/2 panNET (median initial Ki67, 4.6%). Patients were followed up for a median 6.8 years and had a median of two metachronous tumor biopsies over their disease course. 34.8% of patients underwent any form of grade progression, including G1 to G2/3 and G2 to G3, while 24.2% demonstrated G1/2 to G3 grade progression. Over a median 2.3 years, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors experienced a median Ki67 change of +27.0% (range, +6.4 to +48.7%). Subsequent biopsies showing progression to G3 had a median Ki67 value of 31.0% (range, 21.0-60.0%) and were more often performed following suspicious clinical behavior (75.0%) rather than routinely at the time of scheduled procedure/surgery (25.0%). Similar to prior studies, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors had worse overall survival from the time of metastatic disease (median, 4.8 years vs not reached for stably G1/2 disease; P = 0.002). Heavier pretreatment and heterogeneity or lack of uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging was independently associated with progression to G3. In the largest study of metachronous panNET biopsies to date, our findings show that baseline biopsies suggesting G1/2 disease may not accurately reflect future disease status, highlighting the possible limitations of using archived tissue to stratify patients into trials and/or choose future therapy. Additional work is needed to better understand the impact of prior therapies on grade progression and how to identify which lesions to best follow up for repeat biopsy.
高分化胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(panNETs)的分级进展可能随时间发生,其中G1/2至G3是最具临床相关性的形式。在此,我们对66例初始诊断为G1/2级panNET的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究(初始Ki67的中位数为4.6%)。患者的中位随访时间为6.8年,在其病程中进行了两次异时性肿瘤活检,中位数为两次。34.8%的患者出现了任何形式的分级进展,包括从G1进展为G2/3以及从G2进展为G3,而24.2%的患者表现为G1/2至G3级进展。在中位2.3年的时间里,G1/2至G3级进展者的Ki67中位数变化为+27.0%(范围为+6.4至+48.7%)。后续活检显示进展为G3的患者,其Ki67值中位数为31.0%(范围为21.0 - 60.0%),并且更多是在出现可疑临床行为后进行(75.0%),而非在预定的检查/手术时常规进行(25.0%)。与先前的研究相似,从出现转移性疾病时起,G1/2至G3级进展者的总生存期更差(中位数为4.8年,而稳定的G1/2级疾病患者未达到;P = 0.002)。治疗前负荷较重以及生长抑素受体显像存在异质性或摄取缺乏与进展为G3独立相关。在迄今为止最大规模的异时性panNET活检研究中,我们的研究结果表明,提示为G1/2级疾病的基线活检可能无法准确反映未来的疾病状态,这凸显了使用存档组织将患者分层纳入试验和/或选择未来治疗方法时可能存在的局限性。需要开展更多工作以更好地了解先前治疗对分级进展的影响,以及如何确定哪些病变最适合进行重复活检的随访。