Gibson A R, Houk J C, Kohlerman N J
J Physiol. 1985 Jan;358:551-70. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015566.
Correlation and regression analyses were performed on thirty-three of the magnocellular red nucleus cells described in the previous paper. We sought to test for reliable relations between the parameters of individual tracking movements and corresponding bursts of neural discharge. High correlations were found between the following burst and movement parameters: (i) burst latency versus movement latency; (ii) burst duration versus movement duration; (iii) burst frequency versus movement velocity and (iv) number of spikes in the burst versus movement amplitude. Cells were ranked according to the average of the duration, velocity and amplitude correlation coefficients. The top twenty cells had average correlation coefficients ranging from 0.69 to 0.88 for their preferred movement. These cases were judged most likely to reveal the control functions of the red nucleus, and the following points refer to this sample. Burst onset led movement onset by 118 +/- 23 ms, and burst offset led movement offset by 50 +/- 38 ms. Burst duration increased as the duration of the movement increased (r = 0.87 +/- 0.11). The duration of the burst was approximately equal to movement duration (slope of 0.99 +/- 0.16) plus a constant (72 +/- 34 ms) throughout a broad range. Average discharge rate during the burst increased with average movement velocity (r = 0.69 +/- 0.15). The slope of the relation was 0.36 +/- 0.21 (pulses/s)/(deg/s) of joint rotation. The regression lines had consistent upward offsets (56 +/- 15 pulses/s) that exceeded the spontaneous discharge rate (17 +/- 10 pulses/s). The number of spikes in the burst increased with movement amplitude independent of velocity (r = 0.72 +/- 0.11). The slope of the relation was 0.62 spikes/deg and the offset was 13 +/- 4 spikes. The preferred movement was co-ordinated hand in fifteen cases, digit in three, elbow in one and shoulder in one. When these cells were tested with an alternate movement, the failure rate (cases in which a burst did not accompany a movement) increased from 1.4 to 20%, and the correlation coefficients generally were low and lacked significance. Cells in the top twenty had directionally specific responses, low variance in lead time, large depths of modulation (41-118 pulses/s) and low failure rates. Cells that failed to show strong parametric correlations often had one or more of the former attributes. It appears that high parametric correlations with individual movements are particularly restrictive criteria of relatedness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
对前文所述的33个大细胞红核细胞进行了相关性和回归分析。我们试图检验个体追踪运动参数与相应神经放电爆发之间的可靠关系。在以下爆发和运动参数之间发现了高度相关性:(i)爆发潜伏期与运动潜伏期;(ii)爆发持续时间与运动持续时间;(iii)爆发频率与运动速度;以及(iv)爆发中的尖峰数量与运动幅度。根据持续时间、速度和幅度相关系数的平均值对细胞进行排名。排名前二十的细胞对于其偏好运动的平均相关系数在0.69至0.88之间。这些情况被判定最有可能揭示红核的控制功能,以下要点指的就是这个样本。爆发开始比运动开始提前118±23毫秒,爆发结束比运动结束提前50±38毫秒。爆发持续时间随着运动持续时间的增加而增加(r = 0.87±0.11)。在很宽的范围内,爆发持续时间大约等于运动持续时间(斜率为0.99±0.16)加上一个常数(72±34毫秒)。爆发期间的平均放电率随着平均运动速度的增加而增加(r = 0.69±0.15)。该关系的斜率为0.36±0.21(脉冲/秒)/(度/秒)的关节旋转。回归线具有一致的向上偏移(56±15脉冲/秒),超过了自发放电率(17±10脉冲/秒)。爆发中的尖峰数量随着运动幅度的增加而增加,与速度无关(r = 0.72±0.11)。该关系的斜率为0.62个尖峰/度,偏移量为13±4个尖峰。偏好运动在15例中是协同手部运动,3例是手指运动,1例是肘部运动,1例是肩部运动。当用交替运动测试这些细胞时,失败率(爆发不伴随运动的情况)从1.4%增加到20%,并且相关系数通常较低且缺乏显著性。排名前二十的细胞具有方向特异性反应、提前时间的低方差、大的调制深度(41 - 118脉冲/秒)和低失败率。未能显示出强参数相关性的细胞通常具有上述一个或多个特征。看来与个体运动的高参数相关性是相关性的特别严格的标准。(摘要截断于400字)