Coussens Stephen, Ly Dan P
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Abett, Bainbridge Island, Washington.
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):153-160. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6925.
An emergency department (ED) physician's decision to admit a patient to the hospital plays a pivotal role in determining the type and intensity of care that patient will receive. ED physicians vary widely in their propensity to admit patients to the hospital, but it is unknown whether higher admission propensities result in lower subsequent mortality rates.
To measure the variation in ED physicians' admission propensities and estimate their association with patients' subsequent mortality rates.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used nationwide Veterans Affairs electronic health record data from January 2011 to December 2019, comparing physicians practicing within the same ED. The study population was composed of patients visiting the ED with 1 of the 3 most frequent chief complaints in US EDs (chest pain, shortness of breath, and abdominal pain). The data analyses were performed from May 2022 to October 2024.
The main outcomes were variation in physicians' adjusted admission rates, short inpatient stays (<24 hours), and 30-day mortality.
The study population included 2098 physicians seeing 2 137 681 patient visits across 105 EDs. The mean (SD) patient age was 63 (15) years, and 9.8% of patients were female. The mean admission rate was 41.2%, and the mean 30-day mortality rate was 2.5%. Physicians' adjusted admission rates varied greatly within the same ED (eg, for chest pain: 90th percentile of physicians, 56.6% admitted vs 10th percentile, 32.6% admitted; difference, 24.0 percentage points), despite finding no association between these adjusted admission rates and patients' prior health status as measured by their Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score before the ED visit. However, patients admitted by physicians with higher admission rates were more likely to be discharged within 24 hours (eg, 31.0% vs 24.8%, respectively), while patients of physicians with higher admission rates had subsequent mortality rates that were no less than those of patients of physicians with lower admission rates.
This cross-sectional study demonstrated that ED physicians vary widely in their admission propensity, despite seeing patients with similar prior health status. The results suggest that patients treated by physicians with higher admission propensities are more likely to be discharged after only a short inpatient stay and experience no reduction in subsequent mortality rates.
急诊科(ED)医生决定将患者收治入院,在决定患者将接受的护理类型和强度方面起着关键作用。急诊科医生收治患者的倾向差异很大,但尚不清楚较高的收治倾向是否会导致更低的后续死亡率。
衡量急诊科医生收治倾向的差异,并估计其与患者后续死亡率的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了2011年1月至2019年12月全国退伍军人事务部的电子健康记录数据,比较了在同一急诊科执业的医生。研究人群包括因美国急诊科最常见的3种主要主诉之一(胸痛、呼吸急促和腹痛)前来急诊科就诊的患者。数据分析于2022年5月至2024年10月进行。
主要结局是医生调整后的收治率、短住院时间(<24小时)和30天死亡率的差异。
研究人群包括2098名医生,他们在105个急诊科共诊治了2137681例患者。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为63(15)岁,9.8%为女性。平均收治率为41.2%,平均30天死亡率为2.5%。尽管在急诊科就诊前根据患者的埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数评分衡量,这些调整后的收治率与患者先前的健康状况之间没有关联,但在同一急诊科内,医生的调整后收治率差异很大(例如,对于胸痛:医生的第90百分位数,56.6%的患者被收治,而第10百分位数为32.6%;差异为24.0个百分点)。然而,收治率较高的医生收治的患者更有可能在24小时内出院(例如,分别为31.0%和24.8%),而收治率较高的医生的患者后续死亡率并不低于收治率较低的医生的患者。
这项横断面研究表明,尽管诊治的患者先前健康状况相似,但急诊科医生的收治倾向差异很大。结果表明,收治倾向较高的医生治疗的患者更有可能在短时间住院后出院,且后续死亡率没有降低。