Merlotti G J, Marcet E, Sheaff C M, Dunn R, Barrett J A
J Trauma. 1985 Mar;25(3):228-31. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198503000-00011.
A retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate peritoneal lavage in detecting abdominal penetration. Two hundred thirty-five patients with thoracoabdominal, flank, or tangential abdominal gunshot wounds were lavaged. Of these patients, 44 (18.7%) had positive lavages, defined as red blood cell counts greater than 10,000 cells/mm3, white blood cell counts greater than 500 cells/mm3, or the presence of bile, feces, or vegetable matter. There were 13.6% false positives and 1.0% false negatives, with an overall accuracy of 96.6%. The results were unaffected by mechanism or site of injury. If the criteria were changed to include red blood cell counts greater than 100,000 cells/mm3, there would have been no false positives, but an unacceptably high 11.1% false negative rate. Therefore we conclude that peritoneal lavage can be a reliable indicator of abdominal penetration provided sufficiently sensitive criteria are used. These criteria should include red blood cell counts greater than 10,000 cells/mm3 instead of 100,000 cells/mm3.
进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估腹腔灌洗在检测腹部穿透伤方面的作用。对235例胸腹、侧腹或腹部切线方向枪伤患者进行了灌洗。在这些患者中,44例(18.7%)灌洗结果呈阳性,定义为红细胞计数大于10,000个/mm³、白细胞计数大于500个/mm³,或存在胆汁、粪便或植物物质。假阳性率为13.6%,假阴性率为1.0%,总体准确率为96.6%。结果不受损伤机制或损伤部位的影响。如果将标准改为红细胞计数大于100,000个/mm³,则不会有假阳性,但假阴性率高达11.1%,令人无法接受。因此,我们得出结论,只要使用足够敏感的标准,腹腔灌洗可以成为腹部穿透伤的可靠指标。这些标准应包括红细胞计数大于10,000个/mm³,而不是100,000个/mm³。