Suppr超能文献

使用腹腔灌洗来评估腹部穿透情况。

Use of peritoneal lavage to evaluate abdominal penetration.

作者信息

Merlotti G J, Marcet E, Sheaff C M, Dunn R, Barrett J A

出版信息

J Trauma. 1985 Mar;25(3):228-31. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198503000-00011.

Abstract

A retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate peritoneal lavage in detecting abdominal penetration. Two hundred thirty-five patients with thoracoabdominal, flank, or tangential abdominal gunshot wounds were lavaged. Of these patients, 44 (18.7%) had positive lavages, defined as red blood cell counts greater than 10,000 cells/mm3, white blood cell counts greater than 500 cells/mm3, or the presence of bile, feces, or vegetable matter. There were 13.6% false positives and 1.0% false negatives, with an overall accuracy of 96.6%. The results were unaffected by mechanism or site of injury. If the criteria were changed to include red blood cell counts greater than 100,000 cells/mm3, there would have been no false positives, but an unacceptably high 11.1% false negative rate. Therefore we conclude that peritoneal lavage can be a reliable indicator of abdominal penetration provided sufficiently sensitive criteria are used. These criteria should include red blood cell counts greater than 10,000 cells/mm3 instead of 100,000 cells/mm3.

摘要

进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估腹腔灌洗在检测腹部穿透伤方面的作用。对235例胸腹、侧腹或腹部切线方向枪伤患者进行了灌洗。在这些患者中,44例(18.7%)灌洗结果呈阳性,定义为红细胞计数大于10,000个/mm³、白细胞计数大于500个/mm³,或存在胆汁、粪便或植物物质。假阳性率为13.6%,假阴性率为1.0%,总体准确率为96.6%。结果不受损伤机制或损伤部位的影响。如果将标准改为红细胞计数大于100,000个/mm³,则不会有假阳性,但假阴性率高达11.1%,令人无法接受。因此,我们得出结论,只要使用足够敏感的标准,腹腔灌洗可以成为腹部穿透伤的可靠指标。这些标准应包括红细胞计数大于10,000个/mm³,而不是100,000个/mm³。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验