• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重指数对经皮椎间孔镜手术(PTES)治疗腰椎退行性疾病疗效及预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

The influence of body mass index on efficacy and outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Zhuang Chenyang, Xu Yun, Lin Hong, Gu Yutong

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Geriatrics Centre, Shanghai, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02761-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-02761-8
PMID:39819484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11737149/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate and quantify the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy and outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES), a novel minimally invasive surgical technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

A total of 55 patients suffering from single-level LDH with or without high iliac crest, scoliosis or calcification, who underwent PTES in our department from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI. The operative events of two groups including X-ray projection, operation time, blood loss and length of stay were compared. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of the surgery. Differences in complications and recurrences between two groups were also analyzed.

RESULTS

55 patients were divided into obese and nonobese groups according to their BMI (33.03 vs. 23.07). There was no significant difference in X-ray projection (times), operation time (mins), blood loss (mL) and length of stay (days) between two groups (7/5-11 vs. 5/5-10, 58.17 ± 9.20 vs. 53.65 ± 10.06, 6.41 ± 1.43 vs. 5.50 ± 2.45, 3.17 ± 1.44 vs. 2.96 ± 0.53, P > 0.05). Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in ODI (12.01 ± 3.57% vs. 67.16 ± 9.25%, 13.92 ± 4.24% vs. 68.10 ± 9.27%, P < 0.05) and VAS (0.10 ± 0.48 vs. 8.38 ± 0.94, 0.22 ± 0.56 vs. 8.38 ± 0.86) at 24 months after the operation compared with which at the preoperative status. No significant difference in the improvement of the clinical outcomes was found between the two groups in ODI or VAS (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

With the simple orientation, easy puncture and reduced steps, PTES is an effective and safe method to both obese and normal patients with LDH.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

探讨并量化体重指数(BMI)对经皮椎间孔镜手术(PTES)疗效及预后的影响,PTES是一种治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的新型微创手术技术。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年12月在我科接受PTES治疗的55例单节段LDH患者,这些患者伴有或不伴有髂嵴过高、脊柱侧弯或钙化。根据BMI将患者分为两组。比较两组的手术相关指标,包括X线透视次数、手术时间、出血量和住院时间。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估手术的临床疗效及预后。分析两组并发症和复发情况的差异。

结果

55例患者根据BMI分为肥胖组和非肥胖组(33.03对23.07)。两组在X线透视次数(次)、手术时间(分钟)、出血量(毫升)和住院时间(天)方面无显著差异(7/5 - 11对5/5 - 10,58.17±9.20对53.65±10.06,6.41±1.43对5.50±2.45,3.17±1.44对2.96±0.53,P>0.05)。与术前相比,两组术后24个月时ODI[(12.01±3.57%对67.16±9.25%,13.92±4.24%对68.10±9.27%)]和VAS[(0.10±0.48对8.38±0.94,0.22±0.56对8.38±0.86)]均显著降低。两组在ODI或VAS的临床疗效改善方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

PTES定位简单、穿刺容易且步骤减少,对肥胖和正常的LDH患者都是一种有效且安全的方法。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4095/11737149/d17fbf381101/12893_2025_2761_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4095/11737149/25515495f5d2/12893_2025_2761_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4095/11737149/d17fbf381101/12893_2025_2761_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4095/11737149/25515495f5d2/12893_2025_2761_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4095/11737149/d17fbf381101/12893_2025_2761_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of body mass index on efficacy and outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective cohort study.体重指数对经皮椎间孔镜手术(PTES)治疗腰椎退行性疾病疗效及预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02761-8.
2
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 209 consecutive cases.经皮椎间孔镜手术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症:209例连续病例的手术技术、疗效及并发症
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Feb 8;12(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0524-0.
3
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two-Level Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术联合经椎间孔入路与经椎板间入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 双节段椎间盘突出症
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):979-988. doi: 10.1111/os.12862. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study.经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效评价:一项回顾性研究。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):599-607. doi: 10.1111/os.12839. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
7
[Comparison of different transforaminal endoscope approaches in treatment of serious lumbar disc herniation].不同经椎间孔内窥镜入路治疗重度腰椎间盘突出症的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):300-307. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201811005.
8
Residual leg numbness after endoscopic discectomy treatment of lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗后残留腿部麻木。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 27;21(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03302-5.
9
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Changes via a Transforaminal Approach: A Retrospective Study.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗伴有 Modic 改变的腰椎间盘突出症:一项回顾性研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E601-E608.
10
Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal vs. interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective propensity score matching study.经皮内镜经椎间孔入路与经皮内镜椎板间入路治疗 L5-S1 腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 13;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04543-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Research advances in unilateral endoscopic spinal surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a review.单侧内镜下脊柱手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的研究进展:综述
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 11;20(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06071-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial: Novel techniques of minimally invasive spine surgery for various pathologies.社论:针对各种病症的微创脊柱手术新技术
Front Surg. 2023 Sep 1;10:1267438. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1267438. eCollection 2023.
2
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) and mini-incision L5/S1 OLIF with a self-lock cage for the surgical treatment of L5 spondylolisthesis.经皮椎间孔内镜手术(PTES)与微型切口 L5/S1 前路腰椎间融合术(OLIF)联合自锁融合器治疗 L5 滑脱症
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 24;18(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04022-x.
3
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) compared with MIS-TLIF for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disease in elderly patients: A retrospective cohort study.
经皮椎间孔镜手术(PTES)与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗老年腰椎退行性疾病的疗效及安全性比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 17;9:1083953. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1083953. eCollection 2022.
4
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery (PTES) for Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease in Patients with Underlying Diseases: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 196 Cases.经皮椎间孔镜手术(PTES)治疗合并基础疾病的腰椎退行性疾病:一项196例的回顾性队列研究
J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 31;16:1137-1147. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S396993. eCollection 2023.
5
Hybrid surgery of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) combined with OLIF and anterolateral screws rod fixation for treatment of multi-level lumbar degenerative diseases with intervertebral instability.经皮椎间孔内镜手术(PTES)联合 OLIF 和前路螺钉棒固定的杂交手术治疗伴椎间不稳的多节段腰椎退变性疾病。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 17;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03573-3.
6
How to predict the culprit segment in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery under local anesthesia for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases? Radiologic images or clinical symptoms.在局部麻醉下经皮椎间孔镜手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病时,如何预测责任节段?是通过影像学图像还是临床症状?
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1060318. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1060318. eCollection 2022.
7
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery combined with mini-incision OLIF and anterolateral screws rod fixation vs. MIS-TLIF for surgical treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis.经皮椎间孔镜手术联合微创斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术及前外侧螺钉棒固定与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎滑脱症的对比研究
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1049448. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1049448. eCollection 2022.
8
General vs Local Anesthesia for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)的全身麻醉与局部麻醉:系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2023 Jul;13(6):1671-1688. doi: 10.1177/21925682221147868. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
9
Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China.中国肥胖症的流行病学及决定因素。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jun;9(6):373-392. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00045-0.
10
Trailblazing: the historical development of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).开拓创新:后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)的历史发展。
Spine J. 2021 Sep;21(9):1528-1541. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.016. Epub 2021 Mar 20.