Elmrayed Seham, Dai Susan, Lodha Abhay, Kumar Manoj, Fenton Tanis R
Institute of Global Health and Human Ecology, American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.
Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
J Perinatol. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02202-z.
To evaluate the effect of age correction up to 36 months of age for growth assessments of extremely preterm (<28 weeks) and very preterm (28 to <32 weeks) infants.
This longitudinal analysis used data from the Preterm Infant Multicenter Growth Study (2001-2014).
1,416 children were included (Median gestational age = 27 weeks). Chronological age-based weight, height, and head circumference z-scores were consistently lower than those based on corrected age for all ages (0, 4, 8, 21 and 36 months) by up to -5.2 (95% confidence interval -5.4, -5.1) z-scores for length at term. Using chronological age, higher proportions of children were misclassified as having suboptimal growth (up to 72.9% misdiagnosed as stunted and 89.8% misdiagnosed as underweight at term).
For extremely and very preterm children, age correction is required for all growth measures through 36 months of corrected age.
评估对极早产儿(<28周)和早产儿(28至<32周)进行36个月龄以内年龄校正对其生长评估的影响。
这项纵向分析使用了来自早产儿多中心生长研究(2001 - 2014年)的数据。
纳入了1416名儿童(中位胎龄 = 27周)。在所有年龄段(0、4、8、21和36个月),按实足年龄计算的体重、身高和头围z评分始终低于按校正年龄计算的评分,足月时身长的z评分差异高达 -5.2(95%置信区间 -5.4,-5.1)。使用实足年龄时,更高比例的儿童被误分类为生长发育欠佳(足月时高达72.9%被误诊为发育迟缓,89.8%被误诊为体重不足)。
对于极早产儿和早产儿,在校正年龄达36个月之前的所有生长指标评估均需要进行年龄校正。