• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过对意义不明确的GCK变异进行重新分析来改善单基因糖尿病的检测。

Improving detection of monogenic diabetes through reanalysis of GCK variants of uncertain significance.

作者信息

De Sousa Sunita M C, Phan Jennifer M N, Wells Amanda, Wu Kathy H C, Scott Hamish S

机构信息

Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Endocrine & Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Diabetol. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s00592-025-02449-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00592-025-02449-8
PMID:39821340
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the utility of reanalysing GCK variants of uncertain significance (VUS) as an intervention to improve the detection of monogenic diabetes.

METHODS

We examined GCK VUS in a local cohort of individuals with suspected monogenic diabetes and re-curated each variant against the recent ClinGen GCK-specific variant classification guidelines.

RESULTS

Variant reanalysis achieved a new 'likely pathogenic' classification (i.e., positive results) in 4/8 identified VUS. The single most common newly applied criterion indicating variant pathogenicity was a confirmed phenotype of GCK-hyperglycaemia. RNA sequencing and segregation studies were performed in two cases but not additive to reclassification.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first VUS reclassification study in monogenic diabetes using gene-specific guidelines. Within the limits of this small study, we observed a high rate (50%) of VUS upgrades to a positive result, thereby confirming the utility of VUS reanalysis- particularly with biochemical phenotyping- in increasing the detection of monogenic diabetes. We recommend HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and either pancreatic autoantibody negativity or a small oral glucose tolerance test increment as a feasible minimum dataset to inform variant classification at the individual patient level, noting the ongoing work of the ClinGen Monogenic Diabetes Expert Panel in systematically reviewing GCK variants at the international level.

摘要

目的

评估重新分析意义未明的GCK变异(VUS)作为一种改善单基因糖尿病检测的干预措施的效用。

方法

我们在一个当地疑似单基因糖尿病个体队列中检测了GCK VUS,并根据最新的ClinGen GCK特异性变异分类指南重新整理了每个变异。

结果

变异重新分析在8个已鉴定的VUS中有4个获得了新的“可能致病”分类(即阳性结果)。表明变异致病性的最常见新应用标准是确诊的GCK高血糖表型。对两个病例进行了RNA测序和家系研究,但对重新分类没有附加作用。

结论

这是首次使用基因特异性指南对单基因糖尿病进行VUS重新分类的研究。在这项小型研究的范围内,我们观察到VUS升级为阳性结果的比例很高(50%),从而证实了VUS重新分析(特别是结合生化表型分析)在增加单基因糖尿病检测方面的效用。我们建议将糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖以及胰腺自身抗体阴性或口服葡萄糖耐量试验小幅增加作为一个可行的最小数据集,以便在个体患者层面为变异分类提供信息,同时注意到ClinGen单基因糖尿病专家小组正在国际层面系统审查GCK变异的工作。

相似文献

1
Improving detection of monogenic diabetes through reanalysis of GCK variants of uncertain significance.通过对意义不明确的GCK变异进行重新分析来改善单基因糖尿病的检测。
Acta Diabetol. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s00592-025-02449-8.
2
Molecular and clinical profiles of pediatric monogenic diabetes subtypes: comprehensive genetic analysis of 138 patients.儿童单基因糖尿病亚型的分子和临床特征:138例患者的综合基因分析
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Nov 6. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae779.
3
Genetic determinants of testicular sperm extraction outcomes: insights from a large multicentre study of men with non-obstructive azoospermia.睾丸精子提取结果的遗传决定因素:来自一项针对非梗阻性无精子症男性的大型多中心研究的见解
Hum Reprod Open. 2025 Aug 29;2025(3):hoaf049. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaf049. eCollection 2025.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
High Prevalence and Common Forms of Maturity-onset Diabetes of the Young in Greenland.格陵兰青少年发病型糖尿病的高患病率及常见类型
Can J Diabetes. 2025 Apr;49(3):142-151.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
6
Diagnostic Outcomes of Concurrent DNA and RNA Sequencing in Individuals Undergoing Hereditary Cancer Testing.个体接受遗传性癌症检测时同时进行 DNA 和 RNA 测序的诊断结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5586.
7
Clinical Variant Reclassification in Hereditary Disease Genetic Testing.遗传性疾病基因检测中的临床变异再分类。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444526. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44526.
8
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
9
Monogenic diabetes in a Chinese population with young-onset diabetes: A 17-year prospective follow-up study in Hong Kong.中文人群中单基因糖尿病:香港一项长达 17 年的青年发病糖尿病前瞻性随访研究。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Jul;40(5):e3823. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3823.
10
Rare variant analyses in 51,256 type 2 diabetes cases and 370,487 controls reveal the pathogenicity spectrum of monogenic diabetes genes.51256 例 2 型糖尿病病例和 370487 例对照的罕见变异分析揭示了单基因糖尿病基因的致病性谱。
Nat Genet. 2024 Nov;56(11):2370-2379. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01947-9. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation in Monogenic Diabetes of the Impact of , , and Variants on Splicing through the Combined Use of In Silico Tools and Minigene Assays.通过联合使用计算机工具和小基因分析评估单基因糖尿病中、和变体对剪接的影响
Hum Mutat. 2023 Aug 31;2023:6661013. doi: 10.1155/2023/6661013. eCollection 2023.
2
Identification of monogenic diabetes in an Australian cohort using the Exeter maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) probability calculator and next-generation sequencing gene panel testing.使用埃克塞特青少年起病的成年型糖尿病(MODY)可能性计算器和下一代测序基因 panel 检测鉴定澳大利亚队列中的单基因糖尿病。
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Feb;61(2):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02193-x. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
The use of precision diagnostics for monogenic diabetes: a systematic review and expert opinion.
单基因糖尿病的精准诊断应用:一项系统综述与专家意见
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Oct 5;3(1):136. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00369-8.
4
An Italian MODY family with proband and son carrying variants in GCK and HFN1A: is it a true case of digenic MODY?一个携带 GCK 和 HFN1A 变异的意大利 MODY 家系:这是真正的双基因 MODY 病例吗?
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Jan;61(1):131-134. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02171-3. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
5
Partial GCK gene deletion mutations causing maturity-onset diabetes of the young.部分 GCK 基因突变导致青年起病的成人型糖尿病。
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Jan;61(1):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02173-1. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
6
Molecular characterization and re-interpretation of variants identified in Indian MODY subjects towards precision medicine.针对精准医疗,对印度 MODY 患者中鉴定出的变体进行分子特征分析和重新解读。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 16;14:1177268. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1177268. eCollection 2023.
7
Shariant platform: Enabling evidence sharing across Australian clinical genetic-testing laboratories to support variant interpretation.Shariant 平台:实现澳大利亚临床基因检测实验室之间的证据共享,以支持变异解释。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Nov 3;109(11):1960-1973. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.10.006.
8
Improving genetic diagnosis by disease-specific, ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for hearing loss.通过针对听力损失的 ACMG/AMP 疾病特异性变异解读指南提高基因诊断水平。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 21;12(1):12457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16661-x.
9
Impact of Variant Reclassification in Cancer Predisposition Genes on Clinical Care.癌症易感性基因变异分类对临床治疗的影响。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov;5:577-584. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00399.
10
Aberrant Splicing of in Families With Unexplained Succinate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Paragangliomas.不明原因琥珀酸脱氢酶缺乏型副神经节瘤家族中的异常剪接
J Endocr Soc. 2020 Jun 16;4(12):bvaa071. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa071. eCollection 2020 Dec 1.