• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Stepping Stone Clubhouse Evaluation: Exploring Members' Experiences, Service Engagement, and Perceived Impact of the Clubhouse International Model.过渡俱乐部会所评估:探索会员体验、服务参与度以及会所国际模式的感知影响
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb;61(2):382-393. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01397-x. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
[The Clubhouse model for people with severe mental illnesses: Literature review and French experiment].[针对重度精神疾病患者的俱乐部模式:文献综述与法国实验]
Encephale. 2015 Dec;41(6):477-86. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
3
Beyond these walls: Can psychosocial clubhouses promote the social integration of adults with serious mental illness in the community?高墙之外:心理社会俱乐部能否促进重度精神疾病成年人在社区中的社会融合?
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018 Mar;41(1):29-38. doi: 10.1037/prj0000262. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
4
Measuring perceived outcomes from participating at a clubhouse for persons with mental illness: Psychometric properties and associated factors.衡量精神疾病患者参与俱乐部会所的感知结果:心理测量特性及相关因素。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Apr;26(3):219-225. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1508496. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Staff views on member participation in a mental health clubhouse.员工对会员参与心理健康会所的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):788-796. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12697. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
6
"Pushing the Boat Out": A Meta-synthesis of How Members, Staff and Family Experience the Clubhouse Model.“奋力前行”:关于会员、工作人员及家属如何体验俱乐部模式的元整合研究
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Nov;54(8):1199-1211. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0257-5. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
7
"Finally, I belong somewhere I can be proud of" - Experiences of being a Clubhouse member in Norway.“终于,我有了一个值得我为之骄傲的归属”——挪威“俱乐部”成员的体验。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020 Dec;15(1):1703884. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1703884.
8
Psychosocial Outcomes of Canadian Clubhouse Members: A Multi-Site Longitudinal Evaluation.加拿大会所会员的社会心理结果:一项多地点纵向评估。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Nov;60(8):1464-1471. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01280-9. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
9
A conceptual model of how mental health clubhouses impact health and quality of life among individuals with serious mental illness.心理健康会所如何影响严重精神疾病患者的健康和生活质量的概念模型。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2024 Sep;47(3):249-259. doi: 10.1037/prj0000579. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
10
Recovery at the Clubhouse: challenge, responsibility and growing into a role.会所康复:挑战、责任与角色成长。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1938957. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1938957.

本文引用的文献

1
A Contemporary Review of the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation: Past, Present, and Emerging Directions.当代会所模式的心理社会康复回顾:过去、现在和新兴方向。
Psychiatr Q. 2023 Dec;94(4):569-604. doi: 10.1007/s11126-023-10051-w. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Mental health effects of education.教育对心理健康的影响。
Health Econ. 2022 Oct;31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):22-39. doi: 10.1002/hec.4565. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
3
Mapping community: A scoping review of clubhouse members' social networks and their impact on recovery in mental illness.社群映射:对会所成员社交网络及其对精神疾病康复影响的范围综述。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2023 Sep;46(3):250-264. doi: 10.1037/prj0000520. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
4
The 5-year outcome of subjective quality of life in older schizophrenia patients.老年精神分裂症患者主观生活质量的 5 年结局。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):2471-2479. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03062-2. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
5
Peer support for discharge from inpatient mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a parallel, two-group, individually randomised controlled trial.英格兰的住院精神卫生保健出院后同伴支持与常规护理的比较(ENRICH):一项平行、两组、个体随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):125-136. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00398-9.
6
Factorial structure of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者曼彻斯特短程生存质量评定量表的因子结构。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02356-w. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Sensitivity to change over time and convergent validity with level of unmet need.恢复评估量表 - 领域和阶段(RAS-DS):随时间变化的敏感性和与未满足需求水平的收敛有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:560-564. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042.
8
Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation.一项针对精神科住院后由同伴提供的过渡及出院后支持项目的评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1469-x.
9
A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation.对心理社会康复俱乐部模式证据的系统评价
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):28-47. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3.
10
Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity.康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS-DS):其可行性及结果测量能力。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;49(7):624-33. doi: 10.1177/0004867414564084. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

过渡俱乐部会所评估:探索会员体验、服务参与度以及会所国际模式的感知影响

The Stepping Stone Clubhouse Evaluation: Exploring Members' Experiences, Service Engagement, and Perceived Impact of the Clubhouse International Model.

作者信息

Fjeldsoe Brianna S, Vitangcol Kathryn, Lamerton Tayla, Sennett Melanie, Helton Daniel, Hardy Fotini, Wyder Marianne, Cunningham Zoe, McGrath Martina O, Roseby Morag, McLean Andrew, Brown Scott, Lawler Sheleigh

机构信息

Enable Health Consulting, The University of Queensland (School of Public Health (Adjunct)), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Enable Health Consulting, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb;61(2):382-393. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01397-x. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-024-01397-x
PMID:39821499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11772440/
Abstract

The Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation provides non-clinical social support for adults living with a diagnosed mental illness or self-reported mental ill-health (referred to as 'members'). The Stepping Stone Clubhouse in Brisbane, Australia was evaluated between August 2022 and August 2023 using a participatory action research approach. Data was sourced from member surveys, member interviews, and an existing Clubhouse Member Database. Outcomes included members' self-reported psychosocial recovery, social connectedness, quality of life, frequency of hospitalizations, and their attainment of employment and/or education aspirations. In this cross-sectional evaluation, it was hypothesized that existing members (membership: 11 months - 28 years) would report better outcomes than new members (membership: 0-14 days). In total, 161 existing members and 76 new members completed a survey. Twenty-three members also participated in a semi-structured interview. Participants were aged on average 47.1 years (± 13.5), 62% were male and 31% had a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. Existing members reported better scores than new members for: three of the four psychosocial recovery domains (Functional Recovery: 78.0% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.01; Symptom Management Recovery 69.5% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.03; Social Recovery 74.3% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.01); social connection with other members (38.1 vs. 32.2, p = 0.03) and staff (44.5 vs. 38.1, p = 0.02); quality-of-life summary scores (4.6 vs. 4.1, p = 0.01), and rates of mental health-related hospitalization (16% vs. 41%, p < 0.01). Existing members were also more likely to be in some form of employment, compared to new members (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between existing and new members for their educational goals, with 58% of each group wanting further formal education. Stepping Stone members have better outcomes than members who have recently joined the Clubhouse. This evaluation was successful because it intentionally built evaluative capacity and empowered member-centric processes.

摘要

心理社会康复俱乐部模式为患有确诊精神疾病或自我报告有心理健康问题的成年人(称为“成员”)提供非临床社会支持。澳大利亚布里斯班的垫脚石俱乐部在2022年8月至2023年8月期间采用参与式行动研究方法进行了评估。数据来源于成员调查、成员访谈以及现有的俱乐部成员数据库。结果包括成员自我报告的心理社会康复情况、社会联系、生活质量、住院频率以及他们就业和/或教育愿望的实现情况。在这项横断面评估中,研究假设现有成员(会员资格:11个月至28年)的结果会比新成员(会员资格:0至14天)更好。共有161名现有成员和76名新成员完成了一项调查。23名成员还参与了半结构化访谈。参与者的平均年龄为47.1岁(±13.5),62%为男性,31%的主要诊断为精神分裂症/分裂情感性障碍。在以下方面,现有成员的得分高于新成员:四个心理社会康复领域中的三个(功能康复:78.0%对74.0%,p = 0.01;症状管理康复69.5%对65.2%,p = 0.03;社会康复74.3%对70.0%,p = 0.01);与其他成员的社会联系(38.1对32.2,p = 0.03)和与工作人员的社会联系(44.5对38.1,p = 0.02);生活质量总结得分(4.6对4.1,p = 0.01)以及与心理健康相关的住院率(16%对41%,p < 0.01)。与新成员相比,现有成员也更有可能处于某种形式的就业状态(p = 0.01)。现有成员和新成员在教育目标方面没有显著差异,每组中有58%的人希望接受进一步的正规教育。垫脚石俱乐部的成员比最近加入俱乐部的成员有更好的结果。这项评估是成功的,因为它有意培养了评估能力并赋予了以成员为中心的流程权力。