• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恢复评估量表 - 领域和阶段(RAS-DS):随时间变化的敏感性和与未满足需求水平的收敛有效性。

The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Sensitivity to change over time and convergent validity with level of unmet need.

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Local Health District, Mental Health Services, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:560-564. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042
PMID:29407723
Abstract

There is a need for robust outcome measures for use in psychiatric services. Particularly lacking are self-rated recovery measures with evidence of sensitivity to change. This study was established to examine the convergent validity and sensitivity to change over time (responsiveness) of the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS), in comparison to level of unmet need as measured by the Camberwell Assessment of Need - Short Appraisal Scale (CANSAS). Convergent validity was examined through cross-sectional correlations between 540 CANSAS and RAS-DS scores collected on the same day for the same individuals. Sensitivity to change was examined using correlations between change scores in CANSAS and RAS-DS where both were collected on the same day and the two time points were separated by 90 days or more (n = 498). Results demonstrated moderate, significant cross-sectional correlations between CANSAS scores and RAS-DS total and domain scores and between change scores of both instruments. Results suggest that the RAS-DS is sensitive enough to detect change over time. Only moderate correlation between the RAS-DS and CANSAS suggests that, in the context of recovery-oriented service provision, it is important to measure self-reported recovery in addition to level of unmet needs.

摘要

在精神科服务中需要使用稳健的结果衡量标准。特别缺乏的是自我评估的恢复措施,这些措施具有对变化敏感的证据。本研究旨在检验恢复评估量表-领域和阶段(RAS-DS)的收敛有效性和随时间变化的敏感性(反应性),与通过坎伯韦尔需求评估-短期评估量表(CANSAS)衡量的未满足需求水平相比。通过在同一天为同一人收集的 540 份 CANSAS 和 RAS-DS 评分的横截面相关性来检验收敛有效性。通过比较同一天收集的 CANSAS 和 RAS-DS 的变化评分来检验敏感性,两个时间点之间间隔 90 天或更长时间(n=498)。结果表明,CANSAS 评分和 RAS-DS 总分和领域评分之间以及两个仪器的变化评分之间存在中度、显著的横截面相关性。结果表明,RAS-DS 足够敏感,可以检测随时间的变化。RAS-DS 和 CANSAS 之间只有中度相关性表明,在以恢复为导向的服务提供的背景下,除了未满足的需求水平外,衡量自我报告的恢复情况很重要。

相似文献

1
The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Sensitivity to change over time and convergent validity with level of unmet need.恢复评估量表 - 领域和阶段(RAS-DS):随时间变化的敏感性和与未满足需求水平的收敛有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:560-564. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042.
2
Testing the validity of the Recovery Assessment Scale using an Australian sample.使用澳大利亚样本检验康复评估量表的有效性。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 May;41(5):450-7. doi: 10.1080/00048670701264792.
3
The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: a pooled analysis.患者和临床医生评定的精神分裂症需求和治疗关系的有效性:一项汇总分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Oct 30;209(3):711-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity.康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS-DS):其可行性及结果测量能力。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;49(7):624-33. doi: 10.1177/0004867414564084. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Partners in Recovery program evaluation: changes in unmet needs and recovery.康复伙伴计划评估:未满足需求和康复情况的变化
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Aug;42(4):445-452. doi: 10.1071/AH17004.
6
The CANSAS self-report for screening of needs in outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders.用于筛查精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍门诊患者需求的CANSAS自评量表。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Apr;50(3):343-7. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9677-4. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
7
Routine clinical outcome measures for patients with severe mental illness: CANSAS and HoNOS.重度精神疾病患者的常规临床结局指标:CANSAS和HoNOS。
Br J Psychiatry. 1999 May;174:404-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.174.5.404.
8
Evaluating the CANSAS self-report (CANSAS-P) as a screening instrument for care needs in people with psychotic and affective disorders.评估 CANSAS 自评量表(CANSAS-P)作为精神和情感障碍患者护理需求的筛查工具。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Aug 15;188(3):456-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 May 31.
9
Staff and patient assessments of need in an epidemiologically representative sample of patients with psychosis--staff and patient assessments of need.在具有流行病学代表性的精神病患者样本中工作人员和患者的需求评估——工作人员和患者的需求评估
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Nov;38(11):662-7. doi: 10.1007/s00127-003-0669-5.
10
Factors associated with changing patient needs in an assertive outreach team.在一个积极外展团队中与患者需求变化相关的因素。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;53(5):389-96. doi: 10.1177/0020764007078338.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond symptom improvement: transdiagnostic and disorder-specific ways to assess functional and quality of life outcomes across mental disorders in adults.超越症状改善:评估成人精神障碍患者功能和生活质量结果的跨诊断及特定障碍方法。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):296-318. doi: 10.1002/wps.21338.
2
Patterns and Disparities in Met Needs in Community Mental Health Services: Exploring the Utility of the Ontario Modified Met Needs Index.社区精神卫生服务中满足需求的模式与差异:探索安大略省改良版满足需求指数的效用
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01456-9.
3
Collaboration for Recovery: Expert Mental Health Worker Experiences with the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domain and Stages (RAS-DS).
康复协作:心理健康专家使用康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS - DS)的经验
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01476-7.
4
The Stepping Stone Clubhouse Evaluation: Exploring Members' Experiences, Service Engagement, and Perceived Impact of the Clubhouse International Model.过渡俱乐部会所评估:探索会员体验、服务参与度以及会所国际模式的感知影响
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb;61(2):382-393. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01397-x. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
5
Measurement properties of the Thai translation of the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) and comparison of recovery experiences between Thai and Australian consumers living with serious mental illness.康复评估量表-领域与阶段(RAS-DS)泰语翻译版的测量属性以及泰国和澳大利亚重度精神疾病患者康复经历的比较
Transcult Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;61(6):823-832. doi: 10.1177/13634615241250220. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
Feasibility of Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) for everyday mental health practice.日常心理健康实践中康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS-DS)的可行性
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 9;15:1256092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1256092. eCollection 2024.
7
Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice.工作人员对影响使用 RAS-DS 支持协作式精神卫生实践的因素的看法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04996-2.
8
The Pathways to Participation (P2P) Program: A Pilot Outcomes Study.《参与途径(P2P)计划:一项试点成果研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 17;19(10):6088. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106088.
9
Demonstrating the processes and outcomes of a rural Community Mental Health Rehabilitation Service: A realist evaluation.展示农村社区心理健康康复服务的过程和结果:一个现实主义的评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 23;16(11):e0260250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260250. eCollection 2021.
10
A mixed methods evaluation of an integrated adult mental health service model.一项综合成人心理健康服务模式的混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 14;19(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4501-7.