Parker Alyssa J, Brock Peyton, Hughes Mina, Cutshaw Olivia P, Messina Grace, Wiggins Jillian Lee, Dougherty Lea R
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01806-y.
Little data exist to guide suicide assessment protocols in preadolescent youth. Using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) data (N = 10,010) at baseline (ages 9-10) and 24-month follow-up (ages 11-12), this report investigates informant agreement/disagreement in caregiver- and youth- reports of suicidal ideation and their associations with youth sex assigned at birth and symptomatology across preadolescence. Using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) at both timepoints, four informant discrepancy groups were created from caregiver- and youth- reported suicidal ideation: (1) Concordant No; (2) Concordant Yes; (3) Discordant Caregiver Yes, Youth No; (4) Discordant Caregiver No, Youth Yes. Internalizing and externalizing symptoms were measured at the 24-month follow-up using the caregiver-report Child Behavior Checklist and the youth-report ABCD Brief Problem Monitor. Results indicated low-to-fair caregiver-youth agreement for youth suicidal ideation across preadolescence. Suicidal ideation reported by youth, but not caregivers, demonstrated a shift in prevalence at the follow-up, with females surpassing males in self-reported endorsements. Finally, informant groups at both time points were associated with caregiver- and youth-reported youth symptomatology at the 24-month follow-up, and associations varied by reporter. Findings demonstrate the importance of leveraging both caregiver and youth reports to assess preadolescent suicidal ideation and highlight the clinical utility of informant discrepancies in assessing suicide risk. The accurate assessment of suicidal ideation in preadolescents is essential to curb the increasing rates of preadolescent suicide and identify at-risk youth for interventions prior to even larger uptick of suicide in adolescence.
几乎没有数据可用于指导青春期前青少年的自杀评估方案。本报告利用青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的数据(N = 10,010),在基线期(9 - 10岁)和24个月随访期(11 - 12岁),调查了照顾者报告与青少年报告中自杀意念的信息提供者一致性/不一致性,以及它们与青春期前青少年出生时被指定的性别和症状的关联。在两个时间点都使用儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(K-SADS),根据照顾者和青少年报告的自杀意念创建了四个信息提供者差异组:(1)均为否;(2)均为是;(3)照顾者为是,青少年为否;(4)照顾者为否,青少年为是。在24个月随访时,使用照顾者报告的儿童行为清单和青少年报告的ABCD简要问题监测量表来测量内化和外化症状。结果表明,青春期前青少年自杀意念的照顾者 - 青少年一致性较低至中等。青少年报告但照顾者未报告的自杀意念在随访时患病率出现变化,自我报告认可自杀意念的女性超过了男性。最后,两个时间点的信息提供者组与24个月随访时照顾者和青少年报告的青少年症状相关,且关联因报告者而异。研究结果表明,利用照顾者和青少年报告来评估青春期前青少年的自杀意念非常重要,并强调了信息提供者差异在评估自杀风险方面的临床实用性。准确评估青春期前青少年的自杀意念对于遏制青春期前青少年自杀率的上升以及在青少年自杀率进一步大幅上升之前识别有风险的青少年以进行干预至关重要。