Blomberg Agneta, Hensing Gunnel, Bertilsson Monica, Hadžibajramović Emina
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the of University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Stress Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Jun 1;35(3):528-533. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf001.
Measurements of capacity to work (CTW) in relation to common mental disorders (CMD) are needed to improve research on determinants for maintained work participation (WP). The aim of this study was to assess the construct validity of the Capacity to Work Index (C2WI) in a heterogenous sample of the Swedish working population. Cross-sectional web survey data among Swedish employees (n = 8201) was used. The construct validity was assessed in terms of the unidimensionality of the scale, response categories appropriateness, and the differential item functioning with respect to gender and age. Rasch analysis was used in both the full sample and randomly selected subsets. The Rasch model (RM) was fitted using two versions of the C2WI construct: the original 17-item scale and a 7-item scale. The 17-item scale did not discriminate as required, whereas the 7-item scale demonstrated a better fit to the RM. However, statistically significant χ2 statistics indicated non-invariant item performance across the latent continuum. A third attempt assessed both scales on a subgroup, yielding improved results, but an overall fit to the RM was not achieved. CTW in relation to CMD assessed by the C2WI did not fulfil the requirements for construct validity outlined by the RM. Real-world experiences of CTW are complex and reflect expressions of mental health in diverse work environments. Further studies are required to determine the predictive capacity of C2WI and its individual items in relation to relevant outcomes, such as maintained WP in the working population.
为了改进对维持工作参与度(WP)决定因素的研究,需要对与常见精神障碍(CMD)相关的工作能力(CTW)进行测量。本研究的目的是在瑞典工作人群的异质样本中评估工作能力指数(C2WI)的结构效度。使用了瑞典员工(n = 8201)的横断面网络调查数据。从量表的单维度性、反应类别适宜性以及性别和年龄方面的项目功能差异来评估结构效度。在全样本和随机选择的子集中都使用了拉施分析。使用C2WI结构的两个版本对拉施模型(RM)进行拟合:原始的17项量表和7项量表。17项量表未达到所需的区分度,而7项量表对RM的拟合度更好。然而,具有统计学意义的χ2统计量表明在潜在连续统上项目表现不具有不变性。第三次尝试在一个亚组上对两个量表进行评估,结果有所改善,但未实现对RM的整体拟合。通过C2WI评估的与CMD相关的CTW未满足RM所概述的结构效度要求。CTW的实际经验很复杂,反映了不同工作环境中心理健康的表现。需要进一步研究来确定C2WI及其各个项目与相关结果(如工作人群中维持的WP)相关的预测能力。