Turner Nicholas A, Grambow Steven C, Polage Chris, Kuhar David T, Kutty Preeta K, Moehring Rebekah W, Anderson Deverick J
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 4;80(5):975-983. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf020.
The natural history of Clostridioides difficile progression in nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) positive, toxin enzyme immunoassay-negative patients remains poorly described. Better understanding risk for subsequent disease may improve prevention strategies. We aimed to describe the natural history of C. difficile NAAT+/toxin- adults.
A cohort of adults (≥18 years) tested for C. difficile within the Duke University Health System between 15 March 2020 and 31 December 2023 were classified as NAAT-, NAAT+/toxin-, or NAAT+/toxin+ and followed up to 90 days. Three time-to-event analyses were conducted. Incidence of toxin+ episodes was assessed by initial test status (analysis 1). Treatment of NAAT+/toxin- adults was described using cumulative incidence curves (analysis 2). Rates of toxin+ episodes and severe disease were compared between treated and untreated NAAT+/toxin- adults (analysis 3).
The cohort included 24 474 tests and 440 toxin+ episodes among 18 337 unique subjects followed for a median 71 days. NAAT+/toxin- status was associated with subsequent toxin positivity (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.06 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.61-7.10]), especially after antibiotic receipt (aHR, 15.71 [95% CI, 9.85-25.06]). Among 2334 NAAT+/toxin- episodes, 33% received presumptive treatment. Just 5% of NAAT+/toxin- subjects progressed to toxin positivity. Presumptive treatment was associated with lower hazard of subsequent toxin positivity (aHR, 0.12 [95% CI, .05-.29]) but not fulminant disease (aHR, 1.93 [95% CI, .50-7.45]).
Clostridioides difficile NAAT+/toxin- status was associated with subsequent toxin positivity, especially after antibiotic receipt, though absolute risk was low overall. Further research is needed to determine whether and for whom presumptive treatment might be beneficial.
艰难梭菌核酸扩增检测(NAAT)呈阳性、毒素酶免疫测定呈阴性的患者的自然病程仍描述不足。更好地了解后续疾病风险可能会改善预防策略。我们旨在描述艰难梭菌NAAT阳性/毒素阴性成人的自然病程。
对2020年3月15日至2023年12月31日期间在杜克大学医疗系统接受艰难梭菌检测的成年人群(≥18岁)进行分类,分为NAAT阴性、NAAT阳性/毒素阴性或NAAT阳性/毒素阳性,并随访90天。进行了三项事件发生时间分析。通过初始检测状态评估毒素阳性发作的发生率(分析1)。使用累积发病率曲线描述NAAT阳性/毒素阴性成人的治疗情况(分析2)。比较接受治疗和未接受治疗的NAAT阳性/毒素阴性成人的毒素阳性发作率和严重疾病发生率(分析3)。
该队列包括24474次检测,在18337名独特受试者中发生了440次毒素阳性发作,中位随访时间为71天。NAAT阳性/毒素阴性状态与随后的毒素阳性相关(调整后风险比[aHR],5.06[95%置信区间{CI},3.61 - 7.10]),尤其是在接受抗生素治疗后(aHR,15.71[95%CI,9.85 - 25.06])。在2334次NAAT阳性/毒素阴性发作中,33%接受了推定治疗。只有5%的NAAT阳性/毒素阴性受试者进展为毒素阳性。推定治疗与随后毒素阳性的较低风险相关(aHR,0.12[95%CI,0.05 - 0.29]),但与暴发性疾病无关(aHR,1.93[95%CI,0.50 - 7.45])。
艰难梭菌NAAT阳性/毒素阴性状态与随后的毒素阳性相关,尤其是在接受抗生素治疗后,尽管总体绝对风险较低。需要进一步研究以确定推定治疗是否以及对谁有益。