Hong Intek, Bigam Kevin D, McConnell Brie M, Özelsel Timur J P, Sondekoppam Rakesh V
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Davis Centre Library, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Med Gas Res. 2025 Jun 1;15(2):254-265. doi: 10.4103/mgr.MEDGASRES-D-24-00080. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
Animal models investigating sevoflurane or compound A and renal function serve as the initial basis for concerns regarding renal injury following sevoflurane anesthesia and subsequent recommendations of minimum fresh gas flow, but this evidence basis has not been critically appraised. Primary literature searches were performed in MEDLINE OVID, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the International HTA Database, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies in animals utilizing sevoflurane or compound A. The primary outcomes included renal function as determined by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and urine volume. The secondary outcomes included the serum fluoride concentration and histopathological findings. A total of 2537 records were screened, and 21 randomized controlled trials and 9 quasi-experimental animal studies were identified. No associations between sevoflurane exposure and subsequent changes in renal function (blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine or changes in urine volume) were noted. A similar effect on renal function was observed following compound A exposure, but urine volume was elevated following compound A exposure. In addition, the histopathological damage following compound A exposure was observed only at concentrations that are unachievable in clinical practice. Our review of evidence from animal models revealed that sevoflurane usage was not associated with changes in renal function tests or urine volume. Histopathologic changes after sevoflurane exposure were either nonexistent or minor. Studies on compound A did not reveal an alteration in renal function, although histopathological evidence of injury was present when compound A was administered at very high, unphysiologic concentrations. In light of the existing evidence, the initial concerns of sevoflurane-related nephrotoxicity based on animal studies that leads to minimum fresh gas flow recommendations are called into question.
研究七氟醚或化合物A与肾功能关系的动物模型,是引发人们对七氟醚麻醉后肾损伤担忧以及随后提出最低新鲜气流量建议的最初依据,但这一证据基础尚未得到严格评估。我们在MEDLINE OVID、PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、国际卫生技术评估数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库以及科学网进行了文献检索,以确定在动物中使用七氟醚或化合物A的随机对照试验和准实验研究。主要结局包括通过血尿素氮、血清肌酐、肌酐清除率和尿量来确定的肾功能。次要结局包括血清氟化物浓度和组织病理学结果。共筛选了2537条记录,确定了21项随机对照试验和9项准实验动物研究。未发现七氟醚暴露与随后肾功能变化(血尿素氮、血清肌酐或尿量变化)之间存在关联。化合物A暴露后对肾功能也观察到了类似影响,但化合物A暴露后尿量增加。此外,仅在临床实践中无法达到的浓度下才观察到化合物A暴露后的组织病理学损伤。我们对动物模型证据的综述表明,使用七氟醚与肾功能测试或尿量变化无关。七氟醚暴露后的组织病理学变化不存在或很轻微。关于化合物A的研究未发现肾功能改变,尽管在以非常高的、非生理浓度给予化合物A时存在损伤的组织病理学证据。鉴于现有证据,基于动物研究而导致提出最低新鲜气流量建议的最初对七氟醚相关肾毒性的担忧受到质疑。