Suppr超能文献

在一项前瞻性随机早期杀菌活性研究中,康替唑胺在结核病治疗中具有与利奈唑胺相当的疗效。

Contezolid Harbored Equivalent Efficacy to Linezolid in Tuberculosis Treatment in a Prospective and Randomized Early Bactericidal Activity Study.

作者信息

Jiang Guanglu, Liu Rongmei, Xue Yi, Ge Qiping, Nie Lihui, Lv Zizheng, Kong Zhongshun, Shi Jin, Chen Hongmei, Li Hua, Wu Xiaoguang, Xie Li, Song Yanhua, Huang Hairong, Gao Mengqiu

机构信息

National Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Department of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Jan 13;18:261-268. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S499816. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contezolid (CZD) is an analog of Linezolid (LZD) that has demonstrated potent in vitro and in vivo activity against tuberculosis (TB) while presenting a safer side-effect profile. In this study, we evaluated the early bactericidal activity (EBA) of CZD compared to LZD, with LZD serving as a control.

METHODS

Naive, smear-positive pulmonary TB patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either a 14-day monotherapy regimen of 600 mg LZD once daily (QD) or 800 mg CZD twice daily (BID). Sputum samples were collected daily starting one day before treatment initiation and continuing throughout the treatment period. Each sample was processed for the enumeration of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) colonies, and time-to-positivity (TTP) during MGIT960 liquid culture was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 10 eligible patients were enrolled in each treatment group, although one patient in the CZD group was later excluded from the analysis. The early bactericidal activity (EBA0-14) was 0.08 ± 0.12 log CFU/mL/day (95% CI: -0.02 to 0.18 CFU/mL/day) in the CZD group, compared to 0.03 ± 0.10 log CFU/mL/day (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.10 CFU/mL/day) in the LZD group. The increase in time-to-positivity (TTP0-14) was 38.6 ± 43.69 hours (95% CI: -1.85 to 79 hours) in the CZD group and 27.7 ± 78.21 hours (95% CI: -28.15 to 83.75 hours) in the LZD group. LZD showed rapid bacterial reduction in sputum during the first two days of treatment, whereas CZD demonstrated superior efficacy after a few days of treatment.

CONCLUSION

800 mg BID contezolid exhibited comparable efficacy to 600 mg QD LZD in treating pulmonary TB in this EBA study. While CZD showed slower initial bactericidal action compared to LZD, its efficacy surpassed that of LZD after a few days of treatment. Given its similar efficacy and superior safety profile, contezolid may serve as an alternative to linezolid for the treatment of tuberculosis.

摘要

背景

康替唑胺(CZD)是利奈唑胺(LZD)的类似物,已证明其在体外和体内对结核病(TB)均具有强大活性,且副作用较小。在本研究中,我们以LZD作为对照,评估了CZD的早期杀菌活性(EBA)。

方法

纳入初治、痰涂片阳性的肺结核患者,并随机分配接受为期14天的单药治疗方案,即每日一次(QD)服用600mg LZD或每日两次(BID)服用800mg CZD。从治疗开始前一天起每天收集痰标本,并持续整个治疗期。对每个样本进行处理以计数抗酸杆菌(AFB)菌落,并记录MGIT960液体培养期间的阳性时间(TTP)。

结果

每个治疗组共纳入10例符合条件的患者,尽管CZD组有1例患者后来被排除在分析之外。CZD组的早期杀菌活性(EBA0 - 14)为0.08±0.12 log CFU/mL/天(95%CI:-0.02至0.18 CFU/mL/天),而LZD组为0.03±0.10 log CFU/mL/天(95%CI:-0.05至0.10 CFU/mL/天)。CZD组的阳性时间增加量(TTP0 - 14)为38.6±43.69小时(95%CI:-1.85至79小时),LZD组为27.7±78.21小时(95%CI:-28.15至83.75小时)。LZD在治疗的前两天痰菌迅速减少,而CZD在治疗几天后显示出更好的疗效。

结论

在本EBA研究中,每日两次服用800mg康替唑胺治疗肺结核的疗效与每日一次服用600mg利奈唑胺相当。虽然CZD与LZD相比初始杀菌作用较慢,但其疗效在治疗几天后超过了LZD。鉴于其疗效相似且安全性更高,康替唑胺可作为利奈唑胺治疗结核病的替代药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f326/11742132/b6fcb2dce23f/IDR-18-261-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验