• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国海南地区五种恶唑烷酮类药物对……的体外药敏比较研究 (原文中“against”后面似乎缺失了具体内容)

Comparative In Vitro Drug Susceptibility Study of Five Oxazolidinones Against in Hainan, China.

作者信息

Dong Jinhui, Cheng Qian, Tang Chuanning, Zhong Yeteng, Wang Jieying, Lv Meiping, Chen Zhuolin, Li Peibo, Luo Ming, Pei Hua

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, China.

Tuberculosis Research Units, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing 400036, China.

出版信息

Pathogens. 2025 Feb 24;14(3):218. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14030218.

DOI:10.3390/pathogens14030218
PMID:40137704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11945096/
Abstract

Oxazolidinones, novel synthetic antibacterials, inhibit protein biosynthesis and show potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including (MTB). In this study, we aimed to compare the in vitro activity of linezolid (LZD) and four oxazolidinones, including tedizolid (TZD), contezolid (CZD), sutezolid (SZD), and delpazolid (DZD), against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB) isolates from Hainan. We established their epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) using ECOFFinder software and analyzed mutations in (23S rRNA), , , , , , , , and genes to uncover potential mechanisms of oxazolidinone resistance. This study included 177 MTB isolates, comprising 67 MDR and 110 pre-XDR-TB isolates. Overall, SZD exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity against clinical MTB isolates, followed by TZD and LZD, with CZD and DZD showing equivalent but weaker activity (SZD = TZD < LZD < CZD = DZD; SZD < TZD = LZD < CZD = DZD). Significant differences in MIC distribution were observed for TZD ( < 0.0001), CZD ( < 0.01), SZD ( < 0.0001), and DZD ( < 0.0001) compared to LZD but not between MDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB isolates. We propose the following ECOFFs: SZD, 0.5 µg/mL; LZD, TZD, and CZD, 1.0 µg/mL; DZD, 2.0 µg/mL. No statistically significant differences in resistance rates were observed among these five drugs ( > 0.05). We found that eight MTB isolates (4.52% [8/177]) resisted these five oxazolidinones. Among these, only one isolate, M26, showed an amino acid substitution (Arg79His) in the protein encoded by the gene, which conferred cross-resistance to TZD and CZD. Three distinct mutations were identified in the gene; notably, isolate P604 displayed two insertions that contributed to resistance against all five oxazolidinones. However, no significant correlation was observed between mutations in the , , , , , , , , and genes with oxazolidinone resistance in the clinical MTB isolates tested. In summary, this study provides the first report on the resistance of MTB in Hainan to the five oxazolidinones (LZD, TZD, CZD, SZD, and DZD). In vitro susceptibility testing indicated that SZD exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity, followed by TZD and LZD, while CZD and DZD demonstrated comparable but weaker effectiveness. Mutations in and were discovered, but further research is needed to clarify their role in conferring oxazolidinone resistance in MTB.

摘要

恶唑烷酮类是新型合成抗菌药物,可抑制蛋白质生物合成,对包括结核分枝杆菌(MTB)在内的革兰氏阳性菌具有强效活性。在本研究中,我们旨在比较利奈唑胺(LZD)和四种恶唑烷酮类药物,即替加环素(TZD)、康替唑胺(CZD)、舒替利康(SZD)和地哌环素(DZD),对来自海南的耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)和广泛耐药结核病前体(pre-XDR-TB)分离株的体外活性。我们使用ECOFFinder软件确定了它们的流行病学临界值(ECOFFs),并分析了23S核糖体RNA、rpoB、rpoC、katG、inhA、embB、ahpC、fabG1和rpsL基因中的突变,以揭示恶唑烷酮类耐药的潜在机制。本研究包括177株MTB分离株,其中67株为MDR,110株为pre-XDR-TB分离株。总体而言,SZD对临床MTB分离株表现出最强的抗菌活性,其次是TZD和LZD,CZD和DZD表现出相当但较弱的活性(SZD = TZD < LZD < CZD = DZD;SZD < TZD = LZD < CZD = DZD)。与LZD相比,TZD(P < 0.0001)、CZD(P < 0.01)、SZD(P < 0.0001)和DZD(P < 0.0001)的MIC分布存在显著差异,但MDR-TB和pre-XDR-TB分离株之间没有差异。我们提出以下ECOFFs:SZD为0.5 µg/mL;LZD、TZD和CZD为1.0 µg/mL;DZD为2.0 µg/mL。这五种药物之间的耐药率没有统计学上的显著差异(P > 0.05)。我们发现8株MTB分离株(4.52% [8/177])对这五种恶唑烷酮类药物耐药。其中,只有一株分离株M26在rpsL基因编码的蛋白质中出现了氨基酸取代(Arg79His),这赋予了对TZD和CZD的交叉耐药性。在rpoB基因中鉴定出三个不同的突变;值得注意的是,分离株P604显示出两个插入,这导致了对所有五种恶唑烷酮类药物的耐药性。然而,在所测试的临床MTB分离株中,rpoB、rpoC、katG、inhA、embB、ahpC、fabG1和rpsL基因中的突变与恶唑烷酮类耐药之间没有观察到显著相关性。总之,本研究首次报道了海南MTB对五种恶唑烷酮类药物(LZD、TZD、CZD、SZD和DZD)的耐药情况。体外药敏试验表明,SZD表现出最强的抗菌活性,其次是TZD和LZD,而CZD和DZD表现出相当但较弱的有效性。发现了rpoB和rpsL中的突变,但需要进一步研究以阐明它们在MTB对恶唑烷酮类药物耐药中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46cc/11945096/072cd8431149/pathogens-14-00218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46cc/11945096/15d9910aebdc/pathogens-14-00218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46cc/11945096/deeb68de85fe/pathogens-14-00218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46cc/11945096/072cd8431149/pathogens-14-00218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46cc/11945096/15d9910aebdc/pathogens-14-00218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46cc/11945096/deeb68de85fe/pathogens-14-00218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46cc/11945096/072cd8431149/pathogens-14-00218-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative In Vitro Drug Susceptibility Study of Five Oxazolidinones Against in Hainan, China.中国海南地区五种恶唑烷酮类药物对……的体外药敏比较研究 (原文中“against”后面似乎缺失了具体内容)
Pathogens. 2025 Feb 24;14(3):218. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14030218.
2
Comparison of Activity and MIC Distributions between the Novel Oxazolidinone Delpazolid and Linezolid against Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in China.比较新型恶唑烷酮类药物 delpazolid 与利奈唑胺对中国耐多药和广泛耐药结核分枝杆菌的活性和 MIC 分布。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jul 27;62(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00165-18. Print 2018 Aug.
3
Prevalence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in a Chinese multidrug-resistant TB cohort after redefinition.重新定义后中国耐多药结核病队列中广泛耐药结核病的流行率。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Aug 26;10(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00995-8.
4
Beijing genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is significantly associated with linezolid resistance in multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in China.北京基因型结核分枝杆菌与中国耐多药和广泛耐药结核病中利奈唑胺耐药显著相关。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Mar;43(3):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
5
Antimicrobial Effect of Oxazolidinones and Its Synergistic Effect with Bedaquiline Against Complex.恶唑烷酮类的抗菌作用及其与贝达喹啉对复合体的协同作用。
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jan 14;16:279-287. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S395750. eCollection 2023.
6
Novel oxazolidinones harbor potent activity against the clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant in China.新型恶唑烷酮类化合物对中国多药耐药临床分离株具有强大活性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 29;9:1067516. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1067516. eCollection 2022.
7
Susceptibility testing of extensively drug-resistant and pre-extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis against levofloxacin, linezolid, and amoxicillin-clavulanate.广泛耐药和预广泛耐药结核分枝杆菌对左氧氟沙星、利奈唑胺和阿莫西林克拉维酸的药敏试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jun;57(6):2522-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02020-12. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
[Study on the resistance of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis to anti-tuberculosis drugs in group A].A组耐利福平结核分枝杆菌对抗结核药物的耐药性研究
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 12;46(11):1110-1117. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20230804-00046.
9
In vitro activity of linezolid against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, including multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant strains from Beijing, China.利奈唑胺对包括来自中国北京的耐多药和广泛耐药结核分枝杆菌临床分离株的体外活性。
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2012;65(3):240-2. doi: 10.7883/yoken.65.240.
10
Prospects of contezolid (MRX-I) against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.康奈唑胺(MRX-I)治疗耐多药结核病和广泛耐药结核病的前景。
Drug Discov Ther. 2022 May 17;16(2):99-101. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2022.01025. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.耐多药结核病。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Mar 24;10(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00504-2.
2
Contezolid can replace linezolid in a novel combination with bedaquiline and pretomanid in a murine model of tuberculosis.康奈唑胺可在新型联合方案中替代利奈唑胺,与贝达喹啉和德拉马尼联合用于结核分枝杆菌感染的小鼠模型。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Dec 14;67(12):e0078923. doi: 10.1128/aac.00789-23. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
3
Safety and tolerability of tedizolid as oral treatment for bone and joint infections.替加环素口服治疗骨与关节感染的安全性和耐受性
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Sep 26;11(5):e0128223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01282-23.
4
Clinical Utility of Contezolid-Containing Regimens in 25 Cases of Linezolid-Intolerable Tuberculosis Patients.含康替唑胺方案在25例对利奈唑胺不耐受的结核病患者中的临床应用
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Sep 19;16:6237-6245. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S425743. eCollection 2023.
5
Mechanisms of Linezolid Resistance in Mycobacteria.分枝杆菌对利奈唑胺耐药的机制
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 May 24;16(6):784. doi: 10.3390/ph16060784.
6
Novel oxazolidinones harbor potent activity against the clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant in China.新型恶唑烷酮类化合物对中国多药耐药临床分离株具有强大活性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 29;9:1067516. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1067516. eCollection 2022.
7
Drug Degradation Caused by Mutations Confers Contezolid (MRX-I) Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.突变导致药物降解使结核分枝杆菌对康替唑(MRX-I)产生耐药性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Oct 18;66(10):e0103422. doi: 10.1128/aac.01034-22. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
8
CRISPRi chemical genetics and comparative genomics identify genes mediating drug potency in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.CRISPRi 化学遗传学和比较基因组学鉴定介导结核分枝杆菌药物效力的基因。
Nat Microbiol. 2022 Jun;7(6):766-779. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01130-y. Epub 2022 May 30.
9
In vitro activity of tedizolid and linezolid against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a comparative study using microdilution broth assay and genomics.替加环素和利奈唑胺对耐多药结核分枝杆菌的体外活性:微量肉汤稀释法和基因组学比较研究。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;103(3):115714. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115714. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
10
Single Ascending-Dose Study To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Sutezolid in Healthy Adult Subjects.单次递增剂量研究评估苏特唑利在健康成年受试者中的安全性、耐受性和药代动力学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Apr 19;66(4):e0210821. doi: 10.1128/aac.02108-21. Epub 2022 Mar 14.