• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

18年间儿科队列中登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒病的对比分析

A comparative analysis of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika in a pediatric cohort over 18 years.

作者信息

Bustos Carrillo Fausto Andres, Ojeda Sergio, Sanchez Nery, Plazaola Miguel, Collado Damaris, Miranda Tatiana, Saborio Saira, Lopez Mercado Brenda, Carey Monterrey Jairo, Arguello Sonia, Campredon Lora, Chu Zijin, Carlson Colin J, Gordon Aubree, Balmaseda Angel, Kuan Guillermina, Harris Eva

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2025 May 17:2025.01.06.25320089. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.06.25320089.

DOI:10.1101/2025.01.06.25320089
PMID:39830280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11741480/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dengue, chikungunya, and Zika are diseases of major human concern. Differential diagnosis is complicated in children and adolescents by their overlapping clinical features (signs, symptoms, and complete blood count results). Few studies have directly compared the three diseases. We aimed to identify distinguishing pediatric characteristics of each disease.

METHODS

Data were derived from laboratory-confirmed cases (symptomatic infections) aged 2-<18 years enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study in Managua, Nicaragua, and attending a primary health care center from January 19, 2006, through December 31, 2023. We collected clinical records and laboratory results across the first 10 days of illness. Data were analyzed with generalized additive models, day-and-disease-specific prevalence estimates, and machine learning models.

FINDINGS

We characterized 1,405 dengue, 517 chikungunya, and 522 Zika pediatric cases. We included 1,165 (47·7%) males and 1,279 (52·3%) females, with a median age of 10·0 (IQR 7·0-12·7) years. The prevalence of many clinical features exhibited by dengue, chikungunya, and Zika cases differed substantially overall, by age, and by day of illness. Dengue cases were differentiated most by abdominal pain (Prevalence difference (PD) 19·1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15·7%, 22·9%), leukopenia (PD 41·1%, 95% CI: 36·2%, 45·6%), nausea (PD 15·5%, 95% CI: 12·2%, 19·2%), vomiting (PD 21·9%, 95% CI: 17·9%, 26·1%), and basophilia (PD 42·3%, 95% CI: 37·4%, 47·0%); chikungunya cases were differentiated most by arthralgia (PD 60·5%, 95% CI: 56·3%, 64·2%) and the absence of leukopenia (PD -32·0%, 95% CI: -36·7%, -27·1%) and papular rash (PD -14·9%, 95% CI: -17·2%, -12·7%); and Zika cases were differentiated most by rash (PD 31·8%, 95% CI: 27·0%, 36·2%) and the lack of fever (PD -37·3%, 95% CI: -41·7%, -33·0%) and lymphocytopenia (PD -41·9%, 95% CI: -46·6%, -37·1%). Dengue and chikungunya cases exhibited similar temperature dynamics during acute illness, and their temperatures were higher than Zika cases. Sixty-two laboratory-confirmed afebrile dengue cases, which would not be captured by any widely used international case definition, presented very similarly to afebrile Zika cases, though some exhibited warning signs of disease severity. The presence of arthralgia, the presence of basophilia, and the absence of fever were the most important model-based distinguishing predictors of chikungunya, dengue, and Zika, respectively.

INTERPRETATIONS

These findings substantially update our understanding of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika in children while identifying various clinical features that could improve differential diagnoses. The occurrence of afebrile dengue warrants reconsideration of current guidance.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health R01AI099631, P01AI106695, U01AI153416, U19AI118610.

摘要

背景

登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒病是备受人类关注的疾病。儿童和青少年的鉴别诊断因临床特征(体征、症状和全血细胞计数结果)重叠而变得复杂。很少有研究直接比较这三种疾病。我们旨在确定每种疾病在儿科方面的特征。

方法

数据来源于在尼加拉瓜马那瓜进行的一项纵向队列研究中纳入的2至未满18岁的实验室确诊病例(有症状感染),这些病例于2006年1月19日至2023年12月31日期间在一家初级卫生保健中心就诊。我们收集了发病头10天的临床记录和实验室结果。数据采用广义相加模型、特定日期和疾病的患病率估计以及机器学习模型进行分析。

研究结果

我们对1405例登革热、517例基孔肯雅热和522例寨卡病毒病儿科病例进行了特征描述。我们纳入了1165例(47.7%)男性和1279例(52.3%)女性,中位年龄为10.0(四分位间距7.0 - 12.7)岁。登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒病病例所呈现的许多临床特征的患病率在总体、年龄和发病天数方面存在显著差异。登革热病例最具鉴别性的特征是腹痛(患病率差异(PD)19.1%,95%置信区间(CI):15.7%,22.9%)、白细胞减少(PD 41.1%,95% CI:36.2%,45.6%)、恶心(PD 15.5%,95% CI:12.2%,19.2%)、呕吐(PD 21.9%,95% CI:17.9%,26.1%)和嗜碱性粒细胞增多(PD 42.3%,95% CI:37.4%,47.0%);基孔肯雅热病例最具鉴别性的特征是关节痛(PD 60.5%,95% CI:56.3%,64.2%)以及无白细胞减少(PD -32.0%,95% CI:-36.7%,-27.1%)和丘疹性皮疹(PD -14.9%,95% CI:-17.2%,-12.7%);寨卡病毒病病例最具鉴别性的特征是皮疹(PD 31.8%,95% CI:27.0%,36.2%)以及无发热(PD -37.3%,95% CI:-41.7%,-33.0%)和淋巴细胞减少(PD -41.9%,95% CI:-46.6%,-37.1%)。登革热和基孔肯雅热病例在急性疾病期间表现出相似的体温动态,且它们的体温高于寨卡病毒病病例。62例实验室确诊的无热登革热病例,任何广泛使用的国际病例定义都无法涵盖这些病例,这些病例与无热寨卡病毒病病例表现非常相似,尽管有些病例表现出疾病严重程度的警示信号。关节痛的存在、嗜碱性粒细胞增多的存在以及无发热分别是基孔肯雅热、登革热和寨卡病毒病基于模型的最重要鉴别预测因素。

解读

这些发现极大地更新了我们对儿童登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒病的理解,同时确定了各种可改善鉴别诊断的临床特征。无热登革热的发生值得重新审视当前的指南。

资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院R01AI099631、P01AI106695、U01AI153416、U19AI118610。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675b/12087625/7b6aa71714de/nihpp-2025.01.06.25320089v3-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675b/12087625/848b31cbe2fb/nihpp-2025.01.06.25320089v3-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675b/12087625/4d627c68e415/nihpp-2025.01.06.25320089v3-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675b/12087625/7b6aa71714de/nihpp-2025.01.06.25320089v3-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675b/12087625/848b31cbe2fb/nihpp-2025.01.06.25320089v3-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675b/12087625/4d627c68e415/nihpp-2025.01.06.25320089v3-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675b/12087625/7b6aa71714de/nihpp-2025.01.06.25320089v3-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika in a pediatric cohort over 18 years.18年间儿科队列中登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒病的对比分析
medRxiv. 2025 May 17:2025.01.06.25320089. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.06.25320089.
2
Age-dependent manifestations and case definitions of paediatric Zika: a prospective cohort study.儿童寨卡病毒的年龄依赖性表现和病例定义:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;20(3):371-380. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30547-X. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
3
Sentinel Enhanced Dengue Surveillance System - Puerto Rico, 2012-2022.哨点增强登革热监测系统-波多黎各,2012-2022 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024 May 30;73(3):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7303a1.
4
Clinical manifestations of dengue, Zika and chikungunya in the Pacific Islands: A systematic review and meta-analysis.太平洋岛屿登革热、寨卡病毒病和基孔肯雅热的临床表现:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Rev Med Virol. 2024 Mar;34(2):e2521. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2521.
5
Sociodemographic and environmental factors associated with dengue, Zika, and chikungunya among adolescents from two Brazilian capitals.与巴西两个首府青少年登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热相关的社会人口学和环境因素。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Mar 16;17(3):e0011197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011197. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras.洪都拉斯特古西加尔巴初级保健医生对登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒诊断的准确性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 1;23(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08346-1.
7
Prevalence of Emerging Arboviral Infections: A Tertiary Care Hospital-Based Study from Kashmir, Northern India.新发虫媒病毒感染的患病率:一项基于印度北部克什米尔地区一家三级护理医院的研究。
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2025 Feb;25(2):148-154. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2024.0085. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
8
Comparison of clinical characteristics of Zika and dengue symptomatic infections and other acute illnesses of unidentified origin in Mexico.墨西哥寨卡和登革热症状感染与其他不明原因急性疾病的临床特征比较。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Feb 16;15(2):e0009133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009133. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Comparison of clinical presentation and out-comes of Chikungunya and Dengue virus infections in patients with acute undifferentiated febrile illness from the Sindh region of Pakistan.比较来自巴基斯坦信德省的急性不明原因发热患者中感染基孔肯雅热病毒和登革热病毒的临床特征和结局。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Mar 23;14(3):e0008086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008086. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
[Important arboviral diseases in returning travelers: dengue, chikungunya and zika].[归国旅行者中的重要虫媒病毒病:登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒病]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2022 Jun;147(12):755-767. doi: 10.1055/a-1661-3847. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Dengue severity by serotype and immune status in 19 years of pediatric clinical studies in Nicaragua.尼加拉瓜19年儿科临床研究中按血清型和免疫状态划分的登革热严重程度
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jan 10;19(1):e0012811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012811. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Longitudinal analysis of post-acute chikungunya-associated arthralgia in children and adults: A prospective cohort study in Managua, Nicaragua (2014-2018).尼加拉瓜马那瓜前瞻性队列研究:急性基孔肯雅热相关关节痛的纵向分析(2014-2018 年)。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Feb 28;18(2):e0011948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011948. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Virus isolation data improve host predictions for New World rodent orthohantaviruses.
病毒分离数据改善了对新世界啮齿动物 orthohantaviruses 的宿主预测。
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Jun;91(6):1290-1302. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13694. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
Optimising predictive models to prioritise viral discovery in zoonotic reservoirs.优化预测模型,优先在人畜共患病储库中发现病毒。
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Aug;3(8):e625-e637. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00245-7. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Mapping global variation in dengue transmission intensity.绘制登革热传播强度的全球变化图。
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Jan 29;12(528). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax4144.
6
Age-dependent manifestations and case definitions of paediatric Zika: a prospective cohort study.儿童寨卡病毒的年龄依赖性表现和病例定义:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;20(3):371-380. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30547-X. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
7
A Curious Case of Afebrile Dengue.一例无发热型登革热的罕见病例。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2018 Aug;66(8):89-90.
8
Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change.气候变化导致登革热媒介病毒传播风险的全球扩张和重新分布。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Mar 28;13(3):e0007213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007213. eCollection 2019 Mar.
9
Prior dengue virus infection and risk of Zika: A pediatric cohort in Nicaragua.既往登革病毒感染与寨卡病毒风险:尼加拉瓜儿科队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jan 22;16(1):e1002726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002726. eCollection 2019 Jan.
10
Seroprevalence, risk factor, and spatial analyses of Zika virus infection after the 2016 epidemic in Managua, Nicaragua.尼加拉瓜马那瓜 2016 年疫情后寨卡病毒感染的血清流行率、危险因素和空间分析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9294-9299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804672115. Epub 2018 Aug 27.