• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同手术干预后急性A型主动脉夹层的预后分析:一项队列研究

Prognostic analysis of acute type A aortic dissection after different surgical interventions: a cohort study.

作者信息

Zhu Qi-Yuan, Lv Xiao-Shuo, Li Shou-Ming, Li Xiao-Nan, Zhang Wei, Xue Jin-Rong, Zhang Zuo, Uimonen Mikko, Mennander Ari, Zhao Hong-Lei

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, and Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.

Fu Wai Hospital and Cardiovascular Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2024 Dec 31;16(12):8709-8723. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2048. Epub 2024 Dec 28.

DOI:10.21037/jtd-2024-2048
PMID:39831215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11740025/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) requires emergency surgery, but the choice of primary surgery remains controversial. It is believed that simple ascending aorta replacement may lead to higher postoperative survival rate, while the Sun procedure [frozen elephant trunk (FET) + total arch replacement (TAR)] performed in the first stage may obtain better long-term results. The study aimed to compare the outcome of ATAAD patients who underwent the Sun procedure with those without TAR + FET.

METHODS

Data of 452 patients with ATAAD admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital for surgical treatment from August 1, 2020, to August 16, 2022, were collected and analyzed. Patients with the Sun procedure (n=344) were compared to those without the Sun procedure (n=108). The two groups of patients were matched using propensity score matching (PSM), and the risk factors of poor prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average postoperative follow-up period was 976±414 days, and the loss of follow-up rate was 0. The postoperative 30-day mortality rates were 12.56% and 5.38% in the Sun procedure group and the non-Sun procedure group after PSM matching, respectively (P=0.06). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative cardiogenic shock, postoperative cerebral malperfusion syndrome (MPS), postoperative spinal MPS, and need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were independent risk factors for postoperative 30-day death. The 3-year survival rates were 85.02% and 91.40% in the Sun procedure group and the non-Sun procedure group after PSM matching, respectively (P=0.12). According to multivariate cox regression analysis, the independent risk factors associated with postoperative midterm death were consistent with those associated with 30-day postoperative death that pointed out by logistic regression. The incidence of spinal MPS after the Sun procedure was higher than that in the non-Sun procedure group (P=0.003). At 3-year follow-up, the probability of no distal aortic events (DAEs) was 97.17% and 91.59%, in the Sun procedure group and non-Sun procedure group, respectively, representing a significant difference (P=0.02). Multivariate Cox regression showed that Marfan syndrome and non-Sun procedure were risk factors for DAEs. Fine-Gray analysis also produced results similar to multifactor cox regression analysis, that Marfan syndrome and non-Sun procedure were risk factors for DAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality between the Sun procedure group and the non-Sun procedure group. The incidence of spinal MPS in the Sun procedure group was higher than that in the non-Sun procedure group, while the incidence of DAEs in the Sun procedure group was lower than that in non-Sun procedure group.

摘要

背景

急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)需要紧急手术,但初次手术方式的选择仍存在争议。人们认为单纯升主动脉置换可能导致更高的术后生存率,而一期进行孙氏手术[冰冻象鼻术(FET)+全弓置换术(TAR)]可能会获得更好的长期效果。本研究旨在比较接受孙氏手术的ATAAD患者与未接受TAR+FET手术患者的结局。

方法

收集并分析了2020年8月1日至2022年8月16日在北京安贞医院接受手术治疗的452例ATAAD患者的数据。将接受孙氏手术的患者(n=344)与未接受孙氏手术的患者(n=108)进行比较。两组患者采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)进行匹配,并分析预后不良的危险因素。

结果

术后平均随访时间为976±414天,失访率为0。PSM匹配后,孙氏手术组和非孙氏手术组术后30天死亡率分别为12.56%和5.38%(P=0.06)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,术后心源性休克、术后脑灌注不良综合征(MPS)、术后脊髓MPS以及需要持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)是术后30天死亡的独立危险因素。PSM匹配后,孙氏手术组和非孙氏手术组的3年生存率分别为85.02%和91.40%(P=0.12)。根据多因素cox回归分析,与术后中期死亡相关的独立危险因素与logistic回归指出的术后30天死亡相关危险因素一致。孙氏手术后脊髓MPS的发生率高于非孙氏手术组(P=0.003)。在3年随访时,孙氏手术组和非孙氏手术组无远端主动脉事件(DAE)的概率分别为97.17%和91.59%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.02)。多因素Cox回归显示,马方综合征和非孙氏手术是DAE的危险因素。精细灰色分析也得出了与多因素cox回归分析相似的结果,即马方综合征和非孙氏手术是DAE的危险因素。

结论

孙氏手术组和非孙氏手术组术后死亡率无显著差异。孙氏手术组脊髓MPS的发生率高于非孙氏手术组,而孙氏手术组DAE的发生率低于非孙氏手术组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba62/11740025/19c500aea95c/jtd-16-12-8709-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba62/11740025/441d053e0a5d/jtd-16-12-8709-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba62/11740025/579eba01794e/jtd-16-12-8709-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba62/11740025/19c500aea95c/jtd-16-12-8709-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba62/11740025/441d053e0a5d/jtd-16-12-8709-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba62/11740025/579eba01794e/jtd-16-12-8709-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba62/11740025/19c500aea95c/jtd-16-12-8709-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic analysis of acute type A aortic dissection after different surgical interventions: a cohort study.不同手术干预后急性A型主动脉夹层的预后分析:一项队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Dec 31;16(12):8709-8723. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2048. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
2
Extended repair for acute type A aortic dissection: long-term outcomes of the frozen elephant trunk technique beyond 10 years.急性A型主动脉夹层的延期修复:超过10年的“冰冻象鼻”技术长期疗效
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Jun;61(3):292-300. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11293-X. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
3
Comparison of Prognosis Between Hybrid Debranching Surgery and Total Open Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk for Type A Acute Aortic Syndrome Patients.杂交去分支手术与带冰冻象鼻的全弓置换术治疗A型急性主动脉综合征患者的预后比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 27;8:689507. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.689507. eCollection 2021.
4
Major adverse outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk procedure.行孙氏全主动脉弓替换加主动脉弓部象鼻手术的急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者的主要不良结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Nov 15;415:132254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132254. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
5
Risk factors for severe acute kidney injury post complication after total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk, in acute type A aortic dissection.急性A型主动脉夹层全弓置换联合象鼻支架植入术后严重急性肾损伤并发症的危险因素
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2022 Dec;12(6):880-891. doi: 10.21037/cdt-22-313.
6
Strategy for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection considering midterm results: a retrospective cohort study comparing ascending aortic replacement and total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique.考虑中期结果的急性 DeBakey Ⅰ型主动脉夹层的策略:比较升主动脉置换和全弓置换与冷冻象鼻技术的回顾性队列研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jan 22;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02484-6.
7
Early outcomes of hybrid type II arch repair versus total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection: a propensity score-matched analysis.杂交技术在急性 DeBakey I 型主动脉夹层中治疗 II 型弓部病变与全主动脉弓置换加冰冻象鼻技术的早期结果比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):565-572. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa121.
8
Comparative study of the frozen elephant trunk and classical elephant trunk techniques to supplement total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection†.比较研究冷冻象鼻技术与经典象鼻技术在急性 A 型主动脉夹层全弓置换术中的应用。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;56(3):579-586. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz104.
9
Total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection after Bentall procedure in Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者行Bentall手术后A型主动脉夹层的全弓置换及象鼻支架植入术
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(4):2377-2387. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.79.
10
Long-term outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者行 Frozen Elephant Trunk 手术治疗 Stanford A 型主动脉夹层的长期转归。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;154(4):1175-1189.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.04.088. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Complexity in aortic arch surgery and laws of diminishing return.主动脉弓手术的复杂性与收益递减规律
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):1798-1801. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-328. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Major adverse outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk procedure.行孙氏全主动脉弓替换加主动脉弓部象鼻手术的急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者的主要不良结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Nov 15;415:132254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132254. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Aortic arch surgery for DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection in patients aged 60 years or younger.60 岁及以下患者的 Debakey 1 型主动脉夹层主动脉弓手术治疗。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae047.
3
Strategy for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection considering midterm results: a retrospective cohort study comparing ascending aortic replacement and total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique.
考虑中期结果的急性 DeBakey Ⅰ型主动脉夹层的策略:比较升主动脉置换和全弓置换与冷冻象鼻技术的回顾性队列研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jan 22;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02484-6.
4
Early results of frozen elephant trunk in acute type-A dissection in 1445 patients.1445 例急性 A 型夹层中冷冻象鼻手术的早期结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 15;389:131213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131213. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Dec 13;146(24):e334-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
6
Volume Changes in the Descending Aorta after Frozen Elephant Trunk and Conventional Hemi-Arch Repair after Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.急性A型主动脉夹层冷冻象鼻术及传统半弓修复术后降主动脉的容积变化
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;12(10):2524. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102524.
7
Aortic Root and Distal Arch Management During Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: Expanding Horizons.A型主动脉夹层修复术中的主动脉根部和远端弓部处理:拓展视野。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec 1;37(6):37-6. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0178.
8
Composition of the surgical team in aortic arch surgery-a risk factor analysis.主动脉弓手术中外科手术团队的构成——危险因素分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 3;62(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac171.
9
Aortic Arch Management During Acute and Subacute Type A Aortic Syndromes.急性和亚急性 A 型主动脉综合征期间的主动脉弓管理。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Sep;114(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.12.064. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
Frozen elephant trunk in total arch replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and aortic proximalization.全弓置换中使用冰冻象鼻技术:结局和主动脉近端化的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2021 Jun;36(6):1922-1934. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15452. Epub 2021 Mar 4.