• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自多个在线出版商的数字图书馆混合推荐系统模型

Hybrid recommender system model for digital library from multiple online publishers.

作者信息

Jomsri Pijitra, Prangchumpol Dulyawit, Poonsilp Kittiya, Panityakul Thammarat

机构信息

Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Dusit, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand.

Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Nov 18;12:1140. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133013.3. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.133013.3
PMID:39831295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11739703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The demand for online education promotion platforms has increased. In addition, the digital library system is one of the many systems that support teaching and learning. However, most digital library systems store books in the form of libraries that were developed or purchased exclusively by the library, without connecting data with different agencies in the same system.

METHODS

A hybrid recommender system model for digital libraries, developed from multiple online publishers, has created a prototype digital library system that connects various important knowledge sources from multiple digital libraries and online publishers to create an index and recommend e-books. The developed system utilizes an API-based linking process to connect various important sources of knowledge from multiple data sources such as e-books on education from educational institutions, e-books from government agencies, and e-books from religious organizations are stored separately. Then, a hybrid recommender system suitable for users was developed using Collaborative Filtering (CF) model together with Content-Based Filtering. This research proposed the hybrid recommender system model, which took into account the factors of book category, reading habits of users, and sources of information. The evaluation of the experiments involved soliciting feedback from system users and comparing the results with conventional recommendation methods.

RESULTS

A comparison of NDCG scores, and Precision scores were conducted for Hybrid Score 50:50, Hybrid Score 20:80, Hybrid Score 80:20, CF-score and CB-score. The experimental result was found that the Hybrid Score 80:20 method had the highest average NDCG score.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a hybrid recommender system model that combines 80% Collaborative Filtering, and 20% Content-Based Filtering can improve the recommender method, leading to better referral efficiency and greater overall efficiency compared to traditional approaches.

摘要

背景

在线教育推广平台的需求不断增加。此外,数字图书馆系统是支持教学的众多系统之一。然而,大多数数字图书馆系统以图书馆独自开发或购买的图书馆形式存储书籍,未在同一系统中与不同机构的数据建立连接。

方法

一个由多个在线出版商开发的数字图书馆混合推荐系统模型,创建了一个原型数字图书馆系统,该系统连接多个数字图书馆和在线出版商的各种重要知识源,以创建索引并推荐电子书。所开发的系统利用基于应用程序编程接口(API)的链接过程,连接来自多个数据源的各种重要知识源,如教育机构的教育类电子书、政府机构的电子书以及宗教组织的电子书,这些电子书分别存储。然后,结合协同过滤(CF)模型和基于内容的过滤,开发了一个适合用户的混合推荐系统。本研究提出了混合推荐系统模型,该模型考虑了书籍类别、用户阅读习惯和信息来源等因素。实验评估包括征求系统用户的反馈,并将结果与传统推荐方法进行比较。

结果

对混合评分50:50、混合评分20:80、混合评分80:20、CF评分和CB评分进行了归一化折损累计增益(NDCG)分数和精准度分数的比较。实验结果发现,混合评分80:20方法的平均NDCG分数最高。

结论

使用结合80%协同过滤和20%基于内容过滤的混合推荐系统模型,可以改进推荐方法,与传统方法相比,能带来更好的推荐效率和更高的整体效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/aba3c8b4fb6b/f1000research-12-174529-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/18edea39034a/f1000research-12-174529-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/2aece878d27e/f1000research-12-174529-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/7921062b5beb/f1000research-12-174529-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/02c651478b7f/f1000research-12-174529-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/aba3c8b4fb6b/f1000research-12-174529-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/18edea39034a/f1000research-12-174529-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/2aece878d27e/f1000research-12-174529-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/7921062b5beb/f1000research-12-174529-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/02c651478b7f/f1000research-12-174529-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f77b/11739775/aba3c8b4fb6b/f1000research-12-174529-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Hybrid recommender system model for digital library from multiple online publishers.来自多个在线出版商的数字图书馆混合推荐系统模型
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 18;12:1140. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133013.3. eCollection 2023.
2
The Implementation of Recommender Systems for Mental Health Recovery Narratives: Evaluation of Use and Performance.心理健康康复叙事推荐系统的实现:使用和性能评估。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Mar 29;11:e45754. doi: 10.2196/45754.
3
HCF-CRS: A Hybrid Content based Fuzzy Conformal Recommender System for providing recommendations with confidence.HCF-CRS:一种基于混合内容的模糊一致推荐系统,用于提供有信心的推荐。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 9;13(10):e0204849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204849. eCollection 2018.
4
How recommender systems could support and enhance computer-tailored digital health programs: A scoping review.推荐系统如何支持和增强计算机定制的数字健康计划:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2019 Jan 24;5:2055207618824727. doi: 10.1177/2055207618824727. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
5
A Customized Deep Sleep Recommender System Using Hybrid Deep Learning.使用混合深度学习的定制化深度睡眠推荐系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 25;23(15):6670. doi: 10.3390/s23156670.
6
A hybrid recommender system based on data enrichment on the ontology modelling.基于本体模型数据增强的混合推荐系统。
F1000Res. 2021 Sep 17;10:937. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.73060.1. eCollection 2021.
7
Design of Garment Style Recommendation System Based on Interactive Genetic Algorithm.基于交互遗传算法的服装款式推荐系统设计。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 24;2022:9132165. doi: 10.1155/2022/9132165. eCollection 2022.
8
Modeling user rating preference behavior to improve the performance of the collaborative filtering based recommender systems.建立用户评分偏好模型,以提升基于协同过滤的推荐系统的性能。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220129. eCollection 2019.
9
A Smart Recommender Based on Hybrid Learning Methods for Personal Well-Being Services.基于混合学习方法的个人健康服务智能推荐器
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 21;19(2):431. doi: 10.3390/s19020431.
10
A Collaborative Location Based Travel Recommendation System through Enhanced Rating Prediction for the Group of Users.一种基于位置的协作式旅行推荐系统,通过增强用户群体的评分预测实现。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2016;2016:1291358. doi: 10.1155/2016/1291358. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University.新冠疫情与高等教育中的在线教学:以北京大学为例
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020 Apr;2(2):113-115. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
2
Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?优化系统评价中的文献检索——MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL足以识别肌肉骨骼疾病领域的效应研究吗?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0264-6.
3
The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study.
数据库对系统评价结果的贡献:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Sep 26;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0232-1.
4
Creating a literature database of low-calorie sweeteners and health studies: evidence mapping.创建低热量甜味剂与健康研究的文献数据库:证据图谱
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jan 5;16:1. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0105-z.
5
Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions.使用 PubMed 以外的数据源对治疗干预的系统评价结果仅有适度影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1076-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.017. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
6
What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?在搜索定性研究的系统评价时,CINAHL数据库有什么价值?
Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 26;4:104. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0069-4.
7
Value of databases other than medline for rapid health technology assessments.除医学在线数据库(Medline)之外的其他数据库在快速卫生技术评估中的价值。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Apr;30(2):173-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000166. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
8
Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines.在 NICE 指南中提出的临床问题上,搜索 CINAHL 并没有增加价值。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):1051-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
9
EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?用于家庭医学检索的EMBASE与MEDLINE:MEDLINE检索能看到森林还是树木?
Can Fam Physician. 2005 Jun;51(6):848-9.