Suppr超能文献

让卫生系统、服务机构和消费者代表共同参与超重与肥胖项目及服务委托的多标准决策框架的协同设计。

Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services.

作者信息

Thomas Laura, Robinson Suzanne, Burns Sharyn, Mitchell Helen, Begley Andrea

机构信息

School of Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.

Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 20;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01263-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a multi-faceted problem that requires complex health system responses. While no single program or service is sufficient to meet every individual's needs, some criteria that increase the likelihood of program/service quality delivery to produce effective outcomes exist. However, although research on health commissioning is available internationally and is growing within the Australian context, no evidence exists of a multi-criteria decision-making framework to address the complexity required for effective commissioning of overweight and obesity early intervention and weight management programs or services. This study aimed to develop a set of criteria to support effective commissioning in this context.

METHODS

A mixed-methods co-design approach was used to develop a multi-criteria framework. A literature review informed a three-stage co-design consensus-gathering approach. Participants included Western Australian stakeholders from the Western Australian health system, services and consumers, who reviewed, ranked and validated responses and criteria through ongoing discussions. A deliberative forum was held between the two online, modified Delphi surveys to reach a consensus among stakeholders.

RESULTS

Through the co-design, a total of 63 stakeholders were identified: 24 completed the round 1 Delphi survey assessing 22 proposed criteria, 40 attended the deliberative forum and 30 completed the round 2 Delphi survey. A total of 4 themes arose from the co-design process: (1) reduce duplication, (2) demote criteria, (3) re-organize criteria and (4) simplify language, and 10 criteria were established: safety, collaboration and consultation, appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, evidence-based, health service delivery model, sustainability and workforce capacity and competence. The criteria were underpinned by indicators highlighting relevant sub-themes.

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-criteria framework was developed and its application to the commissioning process will enable the selection of programs and services that will likely have an impact on individuals' use of and satisfaction with programs and services, overweight and obesity-related outcomes and inter-agency collaborations to maximize economic and workforce resources.

摘要

背景

肥胖是一个多方面的问题,需要卫生系统做出复杂应对。虽然没有单一的项目或服务足以满足每个人的需求,但存在一些标准,这些标准能提高项目/服务高质量交付并产生有效成果的可能性。然而,尽管国际上有关于卫生委托的研究,且在澳大利亚背景下这类研究也在增加,但尚无证据表明存在一个多标准决策框架来应对有效委托超重和肥胖早期干预及体重管理项目或服务所需的复杂性。本研究旨在制定一套标准以支持在这种情况下的有效委托。

方法

采用混合方法协同设计方法来制定一个多标准框架。文献综述为三阶段协同设计共识收集方法提供了依据。参与者包括西澳大利亚卫生系统、服务机构和消费者的西澳大利亚利益相关者,他们通过持续讨论对回复和标准进行审查、排序和验证。在两次在线的、经过修改的德尔菲调查之间举行了一次审议论坛,以在利益相关者之间达成共识。

结果

通过协同设计,共确定了63名利益相关者:24人完成了第一轮德尔菲调查,评估了22条提议标准;40人参加了审议论坛;30人完成了第二轮德尔菲调查。协同设计过程共产生了4个主题:(1)减少重复;(2)降低标准等级;(3)重新组织标准;(4)简化语言,并确立了10条标准:安全性、协作与协商、适宜性、有效性、效率、公平性、循证性、卫生服务提供模式、可持续性以及劳动力能力与资质。这些标准由突出相关子主题的指标作为支撑。

结论

制定了一个多标准框架,将其应用于委托过程将能够选择那些可能对个人对项目和服务的使用及满意度、超重和肥胖相关结果以及机构间合作产生影响的项目和服务,以最大限度地利用经济和劳动力资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6956/11744878/7cae588c2fb0/12961_2024_1263_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验