Manthey Jakob, Huß Kilian, Buth Sven, Kraus Ludwig, Schranz Anna, Kilian Carolin, Gallinat Jürgen, Schäfer Ingo, Schulte Bernd
Centre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 21;68(1):e21. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.8.
A variety of treatment options for people with alcohol use disorder (AUD) exist. Surveys estimate that 1 in 10 people with AUD utilise treatment, but real-world treatment pathways remain covert. This data-linkage study seeks to characterise treatment utilisation patterns to identify gaps in treatment access and delivery in Germany.
Linking individual-level data from three sources (statutory health insurance, pension funds, outpatient addiction care services) identified seven alcohol-related treatment types delivered in outpatient (brief psychiatric consultation; formal psychotherapy; pharmacotherapy; low-threshold counselling), inpatient (standard, somatic inpatient treatment; intensive inpatient treatment with somatic and psychosocial care), or either of the two settings (long-term rehabilitation treatment) during 2016-2021. For patients with a new AUD diagnosis (ICD-10: F10.1-9), treatment utilisation over 24 months was recorded and patterns were identified using latent class analyses.
Of = 9,491 patients with a new AUD diagnosis, 30% utilised at least one alcohol-related treatment type. Treatment utilisation was associated with younger age, female sex, unemployment, German nationality, and lower physical comorbidity. Among treatment entrants, nearly half received only brief psychiatric consultation. A similar share of patients utilised standard or intensive inpatient treatment; the latter occasionally followed by rehabilitation treatment. Formal psychotherapy, low-threshold counselling, and pharmacotherapy were rarely utilised and were mostly used in conjunction with other treatments.
The real-world utilisation of alcohol-related treatments contrasts with existing guidelines, as most patients with diagnosed AUD do not receive adequate care. Structural and social barriers should be minimised to ensure healthcare provision for those affected.
对于酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者存在多种治疗选择。调查估计,每10名AUD患者中有1人接受治疗,但现实世界中的治疗途径仍然不为人知。这项数据关联研究旨在描述治疗利用模式,以确定德国在治疗获取和提供方面的差距。
将来自三个来源(法定医疗保险、养老基金、门诊成瘾护理服务)的个体层面数据相链接,确定了2016 - 2021年期间在门诊(简短精神科咨询;正式心理治疗;药物治疗;低门槛咨询)、住院(标准躯体住院治疗;伴有躯体和心理社会护理的强化住院治疗)或两种环境之一(长期康复治疗)中提供的七种与酒精相关的治疗类型。对于新诊断为AUD(国际疾病分类第十版:F10.1 - 9)的患者,记录其24个月内的治疗利用情况,并使用潜在类别分析确定模式。
在9491名新诊断为AUD的患者中,30%至少使用了一种与酒精相关的治疗类型。治疗利用与年龄较小、女性、失业、德国国籍和较低的身体合并症有关。在开始接受治疗的患者中,近一半仅接受简短精神科咨询。使用标准或强化住院治疗的患者比例相似;后者偶尔接着进行康复治疗。正式心理治疗、低门槛咨询和药物治疗很少被使用,并且大多与其他治疗联合使用。
与酒精相关治疗的现实世界利用情况与现有指南形成对比,因为大多数诊断为AUD的患者没有得到充分的护理。应尽量减少结构和社会障碍,以确保为受影响者提供医疗服务。