Saady Marwa, Eissa Mahmoud, Yacoub Ahmed S, Hamed Ahmed B, Azzazy Hassan Mohamed El-Said
Department of Chemistry, School of Sciences & Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P. O. Box 74, New Cairo 11835, Egypt.
Department of Ophthalmology, Salisbury District Hospital, Odstock Rd, Salisbury SP2 8BJ. United Kingdom.
Artif Intell Med. 2025 Mar;161:103066. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103066. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
There is a growing interest in leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to enhance various aspects of clinical trials. The goal of this systematic review is to assess the impact of implementing AI approaches on different aspects of oncology clinical trials.
Pertinent keywords were used to find relevant articles published in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, which described the clinical application of AI approaches. A quality evaluation utilizing a customized checklist specifically adapted was conducted. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024537153).
Out of the identified 2833 studies, 72 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical Trial Enrollment & Eligibility were among the most commonly studied clinical trial aspects with 30 papers. The prediction of outcomes was covered in 25 studies of which 15 addressed the prediction of patients' survival and 10 addressed the prediction of drug outcomes. The trial design was studied in 10 articles. Three studies addressed each of the personalized treatments and decision-making, while one addressed data management. The results demonstrate using AI in cancer clinical trials has the potential to increase clinical trial enrollment, predict clinical outcomes, improve trial design, enhance personalized treatments, and increase concordance in decision-making. Additionally, automating some areas and tasks, clinical trials were made more efficient, and human error was minimized. Nevertheless, concerns and restrictions related to the application of AI in clinical studies are also noted.
AI tools have the potential to revolutionize the design, enrollment rate, and outcome prediction of oncology clinical trials.
利用人工智能(AI)技术提升临床试验的各个方面正引发越来越多的关注。本系统评价的目的是评估实施人工智能方法对肿瘤学临床试验不同方面的影响。
使用相关关键词在PubMed、Scopus和谷歌学术数据库中查找描述人工智能方法临床应用的相关文章。采用专门定制的清单进行质量评估。本研究已在PROSPERO(CRD42024537153)注册。
在识别出的2833项研究中,72项研究符合纳入标准。临床试验入组与资格是最常被研究的临床试验方面,有30篇论文。结局预测在25项研究中有所涉及,其中15项涉及患者生存预测,10项涉及药物结局预测。试验设计在10篇文章中被研究。三项研究分别涉及个性化治疗和决策制定,一项涉及数据管理。结果表明,在癌症临床试验中使用人工智能有可能增加临床试验入组、预测临床结局、改进试验设计、加强个性化治疗并提高决策一致性。此外,通过自动化一些领域和任务,临床试验效率更高,人为错误降至最低。然而,也指出了与人工智能在临床研究中的应用相关的担忧和限制。
人工智能工具有可能彻底改变肿瘤学临床试验的设计、入组率和结局预测。