Panahimoghadam Seyedehatefeh, Veugelers Paul J, Dabravolskaj Julia, Tran Trudy, Maximova Katerina
School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Nutr. 2025 Jan 7;11:1519829. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1519829. eCollection 2024.
The Healthy Eating Index-Canada 2015 (HEI-C 2015), Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I), and Healthy Eating Food Index 2019 (HEFI-2019) are commonly used to summarize the quality of Canadian diets. This paper sought to compare these three diet quality indices with respect to their ability to capture diets of different quality in Canadian children and to discriminate between population subgroups.
Data were collected in school-based surveys from grade 4-6 students (9-12 years old) in western Canada through 24-h dietary recall in 2016 ( = 336), 2018 ( = 454), and 2020/2021 ( = 909). Diet quality was assessed using HEI-C 2015, DQI-I and HEFI-2019. Agreement between the three indices was assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models assessed diet quality according to student's sex, grade level, school material/social deprivation, and geographic region.
HEFI-2019 scores had the widest range, while DQI-I had the smallest. Agreement was 0.55 between HEI-C 2015 and DQI-I, 0.38 between HEI-C 2015 and HEFI-2019, and 0.29 between DQI-I and HEFI-2019. Boys and students from materially deprived areas reported diets of lower quality, irrespective of the index. There were no differences in diet quality across grade levels and geographic region. Energy consumption was associated positively with DQI-I and negatively HEFI-2019 scores.
The three indices demonstrated fair to moderate agreement and varying ability to discriminate diet quality between different population subgroups of Canadian children. This study shows that the choice of a diet quality index affects the interpretation of results and practical considerations, yielding different conclusions with respect to the determinants of children's diet quality. Seeking consensus on which diet quality index to use for research, policy and/or practice would help support dietary research and policy development, and promote dietary guidelines implementation.
《2015年加拿大健康饮食指数》(HEI-C 2015)、《国际饮食质量指数》(DQI-I)和《2019年健康饮食食物指数》(HEFI-2019)常用于总结加拿大饮食质量。本文旨在比较这三种饮食质量指数在反映加拿大儿童不同质量饮食以及区分不同人群亚组方面的能力。
通过对加拿大西部4至6年级学生(9至12岁)进行基于学校的调查收集数据,于2016年(n = 336)、2018年(n = 454)和2020/2021年(n = 909)采用24小时膳食回顾法。使用HEI-C 2015、DQI-I和HEFI-2019评估饮食质量。使用加权科恩kappa系数评估三种指数之间的一致性。单变量和多变量线性回归模型根据学生的性别、年级水平、学校物质/社会剥夺程度和地理区域评估饮食质量。
HEFI-2019得分范围最广,而DQI-I得分范围最小。HEI-C 2015与DQI-I之间的一致性为0.55,HEI-C 2015与HEFI-2019之间为0.38,DQI-I与HEFI-2019之间为0.29。无论采用哪种指数,来自物质匮乏地区的男孩和学生报告的饮食质量较低。不同年级水平和地理区域的饮食质量没有差异。能量消耗与DQI-I呈正相关,与HEFI-2019得分呈负相关。
这三种指数显示出中等程度的一致性以及区分加拿大儿童不同人群亚组饮食质量的不同能力。本研究表明,饮食质量指数的选择会影响结果的解释和实际考量,对于儿童饮食质量的决定因素会得出不同结论。就用于研究、政策和/或实践的饮食质量指数达成共识,将有助于支持饮食研究和政策制定,并促进饮食指南的实施。