English W B, Lagassé B, Brown S, Boldenow M, Burger J, Casler B, Dey A D, Feigin S, Freeman S, Gates H R, Iaquinto K E, Koch S, Lamarre J F, Lanctot R B, Latty C, Loverti V, McKinnon L, Newstead D, Niles L, Nol E, Payer D, Porter R, Rausch J, Saalfeld S T, Sanders F, Senner N R, Schulte S, Sowl K, Winn B, Wright L, Wunder M B, Smith P A
Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Department of Biology and Wildlife University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks Alaska USA.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e70610. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70610. eCollection 2025 Jan.
For birds breeding in the Arctic, nest success is affected by the timing of nest initiation, which is partially determined by local conditions such as snow cover. However, conditions during the non-breeding season can carry over to affect the timing of breeding. We used tracking and breeding data from 248 individuals of 8 species and subspecies of Arctic-breeding shorebirds to estimate how the timing of nest initiation is related to local conditions like snowmelt phenology versus prior conditions, measured by the timing and speed of migration. Using path analysis, our global model showed that local and prior conditions have similar effect sizes (Standardised Path Coefficients ± SE of 0.44 ± 0.07 and 0.43 ± 0.07 for snowmelt and arrival timing, respectively), suggesting that both influence the timing of breeding and therefore potentially reproductive output. However, the importance of each variable varied across species. Individuals that arrived later to the breeding grounds did not leave the wintering grounds later, but instead took longer to migrate, potentially reflecting differences in flight speed or time spent at stopover sites. We hypothesise that this may be due to reduced habitat quality at some stopover sites or an inability to adjust their departure timing or migration speed to match the advancing spring phenology in the North. Individuals that migrated longer distances also arrived and nested later. Our results highlight the benefits and potential conservation implications of using a full annual cycle approach to assess the factors influencing reproductive timing of birds.
对于在北极繁殖的鸟类来说,筑巢成功率受开始筑巢时间的影响,而开始筑巢时间部分由当地条件决定,比如积雪情况。然而,非繁殖季节的条件可能会延续影响繁殖时间。我们利用来自8种北极繁殖滨鸟的248个个体的追踪和繁殖数据,来估计开始筑巢时间与诸如融雪物候等当地条件以及之前的条件(通过迁徙时间和速度衡量)之间的关系。通过路径分析,我们的全局模型显示当地条件和之前的条件具有相似的效应大小(融雪时间和到达时间的标准化路径系数±标准误分别为0.44±0.07和0.43±0.07),这表明两者都影响繁殖时间,进而可能影响繁殖产出。然而,每个变量的重要性因物种而异。较晚到达繁殖地的个体并非较晚离开越冬地,而是迁徙时间更长,这可能反映了飞行速度或在中途停留地停留时间的差异。我们推测这可能是由于一些中途停留地的栖息地质量下降,或者它们无法调整离开时间或迁徙速度以适应北方春季物候的提前。迁徙距离更长的个体到达和筑巢的时间也更晚。我们的结果凸显了采用全年周期方法来评估影响鸟类繁殖时间的因素所带来的益处以及潜在的保护意义。