Suppr超能文献

无需膀胱镜的输尿管支架取出术:一种在新冠疫情期间安全有效的方法。

Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal: a safe and effective method during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Silang Jiangcun, Gu Yalong, Gazang Ciren, Duan Peichen, Tian Xinlong, Luo Feng, Wang Jinlong, Zheng Lei, Du Zhiqiang, Yi Hao, Wang Feng, Hao Yichang, Zhang Baopeng

机构信息

Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region Lhasa 850000, Tibet Autonomous Region, PR China.

Department of Emergency, Tibetan Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region Lhasa 850000, Tibet Autonomous Region, PR China.

出版信息

Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2024 Dec 15;12(6):367-374. doi: 10.62347/HSPG8492. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Ureteral stent must be removed within a certain period, usually performed under the cystoscope. However, cystoscopic operations procedures carry risks such as urethral injury, hemorrhage, and infection. This study aimed to implement a cystoscope-free method for ureteral stent removal during the COVID-19 pandemic to mitigate the complications associated with cystoscopy, reduce the risk of cross-infection, and conserve medical resources and time. We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent ureteral stent removal at our institution between August and December 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic. A simple device, consisting of an F6 or F8 gastric tube with the front end passing through a 3-0 Prolene line was utilized to extract the double-J stents without cystoscopic assistance. The gastric tube with the line was inserted into the urethra to drain urine from the bladder, saline was injected into the bladder, and the gastric tube was rotated with the line for 4-5 weeks, after which the stent tube was removed by gently pulling it outward. Perioperative characteristics assessed included operation time, pain score, stent removal success rate, postoperative complications, and reasons for stent removal failure. Among the 33 cases included in the study, 17 were males and 16 were females; 20 patients were older than 14 years while 13 were younger. Cystoscope-free stent removal was performed in all cases, with a success rate of 96.9% (32 patients), including 25 cases (78.1%) completed in one operation, four cases (12.5%) in two operations, and three cases (9.4%) in three operations. The mean extubation time was 4.3 ± 1.5 minutes, and the average pain score was 2.1 ± 0.7. No serious postoperative complications were noted. Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal can be executed by a single physician, demonstrating simplicity, safety, effectiveness, and fewer complications. This method reduces the risk of cross-infection and conserves medical resources and time during the COVID-19 pandemic, making it suitable for both adults and children.

摘要

输尿管支架必须在一定时期内取出,通常在膀胱镜下进行。然而,膀胱镜手术操作存在尿道损伤、出血和感染等风险。本研究旨在在新冠疫情期间实施一种无需膀胱镜的输尿管支架取出方法,以减轻与膀胱镜检查相关的并发症,降低交叉感染风险,并节省医疗资源和时间。我们回顾性分析了2022年8月至12月新冠疫情期间在我院接受输尿管支架取出术的33例患者。使用一种简单的装置,由前端穿过3-0普理灵线的F6或F8胃管组成,在无需膀胱镜辅助的情况下取出双J支架。将带线胃管插入尿道以引流膀胱尿液,向膀胱内注入生理盐水,带线胃管旋转4-5周,然后轻轻向外牵拉取出支架管。评估的围手术期特征包括手术时间、疼痛评分、支架取出成功率、术后并发症以及支架取出失败的原因。本研究纳入的33例患者中,男性17例,女性16例;年龄大于14岁的患者20例,小于14岁的患者13例。所有病例均采用无需膀胱镜的支架取出术,成功率为96.9%(32例患者),其中25例(78.1%)一次手术完成,4例(12.5%)两次手术完成,3例(9.4%)三次手术完成。平均拔管时间为4.3±1.5分钟,平均疼痛评分为

相似文献

1
Cystoscope-free ureteral stent removal: a safe and effective method during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2024 Dec 15;12(6):367-374. doi: 10.62347/HSPG8492. eCollection 2024.
2
Prolene suture-assisted cystoscopic removal of double J ureteral stents in infants.
Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 26;13:1555402. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1555402. eCollection 2025.
3
[Effect and safety of self-draining ureteral stent with thread in kidney transplant reci-pients].
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Dec 18;56(4):656-660. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.04.018.
4
Feasibility and Safety of a Simple Non-cystoscopic Double-J Tube Removal Technique in Children.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 4;9:761903. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.761903. eCollection 2021.
10
External extension of double-J ureteral stent during pyeloplasty: inexpensive stent and non-cystoscopic removal.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Apr;46(4):671-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0594-9. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging the knowledge gap: past, present and future of antibiotic use for ureteral stents.
BJU Int. 2024 Dec;134(6):858-868. doi: 10.1111/bju.16515. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Recent development and future application of biodegradable ureteral stents.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 20;12:1373130. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1373130. eCollection 2024.
3
Factors associated with unplanned clinical encounters for ureteral stent-related symptoms.
World J Urol. 2024 Feb 7;42(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04768-x.
6
The "ins and outs" of the magnetic ureteral stent: A novel innovation in Endourology.
Curr Urol. 2023 Jun;17(2):92-99. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000104. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
Comparison of the Removal Efficiency and Safety of Magnetic Versus Conventional Ureteral Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Apr 29;52:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.004. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Complications and Management of Retained Double-J Stents in Children During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2022 Nov-Dec;27(6):735-740. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_67_22. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
9
Advances in the development of biodegradable coronary stents: A translational perspective.
Mater Today Bio. 2022 Jul 19;16:100368. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100368. eCollection 2022 Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验