Lee Hsuan-Yen, Chao Te, Hsu Chi-Chieh, Chang Ning-Wei, Chen Yi-Liang, Tsai Yung-Shen
Graduate Institute of Sports Training, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Sports Science, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 7;12:1505648. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505648. eCollection 2024.
To examine the effects of different warm-up methods on 50 m breaststroke performance in both breaststroke specialists and individual medley swimmers.
18 swimmers (breaststroke group: 9, individual medley group: 9) who met the qualification standards for the National Intercollegiate Athletic Games participated in this study. Each participant completed four different warm-up protocols (a conventional 1,400 m warm-up and a 700 m conventional warm-up that integrated tubing-assisted (TA), paddle (PD), or squat (SQ) warm-ups) over four separate days. Following each warm-up protocol, a 50 m breaststroke performance test was conducted with inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors attached to specific body segments to evaluate and compare stroke performance, stroke length, stroke frequency, and the acceleration of the hands, sacrum, and feet across different warm-up methods.
The breaststroke specialists who performed the TA warm-ups recorded significantly less time than those who performed the conventional 1,400 m warm-ups (35.31 ± 1.66 s vs. 35.67 ± 1.83 s, = 0.006). There was a trend that individual medley specialists who performed the SQ warm-ups recorded less time than those who performed the PD warm-ups (34.52 ± 1.45 s vs. 34.92 ± 1.46 s, = 0.043). The stroke length of breaststroke specialists following the TA warm-ups was shorter than that following the PD warm-ups, the SQ warm-ups, and the conventional 1,400 m warm-ups. Breaststroke specialists who engaged in the TA warm-ups had higher stroke frequency than those who engaged in the conventional 1,400 m warm-ups, the SQ warm-ups, and the PD warm-ups. During the TA warm-ups, breaststroke specialists exhibited a shorter stroke length and a higher stroke frequency than individual medley specialists. Acceleration data from the center of mass and limb segments, recorded by IMUs, were insufficient to fully explain the variations in stroke frequency, stroke length, and overall performance caused by the different warm-up protocols.
Breaststroke specialists exhibited significant improvement in their 50 m breaststroke performance after the TA warm-up. By contrast, individual medley specialists benefited more from the SQ warm-up.
研究不同热身方法对蛙泳专项运动员和个人混合泳运动员50米蛙泳成绩的影响。
18名符合全国大学生运动会资格标准的游泳运动员(蛙泳组9人,个人混合泳组9人)参与了本研究。每位参与者在四个不同的日子里完成了四种不同的热身方案(传统的1400米热身以及将弹力带辅助(TA)、划水掌(PD)或深蹲(SQ)热身整合其中的700米传统热身)。在每个热身方案之后,使用附着在特定身体部位的惯性测量单元(IMU)传感器进行50米蛙泳成绩测试,以评估和比较不同热身方法下的划水表现、划水长度、划水频率以及手部、骶骨和脚部的加速度。
进行TA热身的蛙泳专项运动员的用时显著少于进行传统1400米热身的运动员(35.31±1.66秒对35.67±1.83秒,P = 0.006)。有一种趋势是,进行SQ热身的个人混合泳专项运动员的用时少于进行PD热身的运动员(34.52±1.45秒对34.92±1.46秒,P = 0.043)。TA热身之后,蛙泳专项运动员的划水长度短于PD热身、SQ热身以及传统1400米热身之后的划水长度。进行TA热身的蛙泳专项运动员的划水频率高于进行传统1400米热身、SQ热身和PD热身的运动员。在TA热身过程中,蛙泳专项运动员的划水长度短于个人混合泳专项运动员,划水频率高于个人混合泳专项运动员。IMU记录的来自质心和肢体节段的加速度数据不足以充分解释不同热身方案导致的划水频率、划水长度和整体表现的变化。
蛙泳专项运动员在TA热身之后50米蛙泳成绩有显著提高。相比之下,个人混合泳专项运动员从SQ热身中获益更多。