Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, UNIFIEO - Centro Universitário FIEO, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Biomech. 2024 Nov;176:112380. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112380. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
Breaststroke and butterfly are complex swimming techniques requiring refined motor skills to perform successfully, with coordinated and consistent interaction between propulsive and resistive forces being decisive when considering swimmers expertise. The current study analysed those techniques intercycle kinematic variation in two swimmers cohorts. Twenty elite and 15 national level swimmers performed one 25 m breaststroke and one 25 m butterfly sprints, with an underwater camera recording images at 120 Hz in the sagittal plane. Mean velocity, maximum and minimum velocities, stroke rate and length, intracycle velocity variation and phases relative duration were calculated for consecutive cycles (elite: five breaststroke/butterfly, national level: eight breaststroke/seven butterfly). The two highest peaks and the lower peak in between in breaststroke were also addressed. Intercycle and inter-groups analysis were performed using ANOVA, ANCOVA and Statistical Parametric Mapping. Elite and national level differed regarding breaststroke mean and maximum velocities, 1st and 2nd peaks and minimum between peaks (1.30 ± 0.02 vs 1.15 ± 0.02 m/s, 2.13 ± 0.05 vs 1.88 ± 0.06 m/s, 1.63 ± 0.05 vs 1.48 ± 0.05 m/s, 2.13 ± 0.05 vs 1.86 ± 0.05 m/s, 1.33 ± 0.04 vs 1.23 ± 0.04 m/s), and butterfly mean, maximum and minimum velocities, stroke rate and intracycle velocity variation, respectively (1.65 ± 0.01 vs 1.50 ± 0.01 m/s, 2.20 ± 0.04 vs 2.09 ± 0.04 m/s, 1.12 ± 0.04 vs 0.79 ± 0.04 m/s, (57.9 ± 0.9 vs 54.9 ± 1.0cycles/min, 18.4 ± 1.3 vs 23.7 ± 1.3 %). Elite and national level swimmers showed consistent breaststroke intercycle kinematic variation, but a butterfly mean velocity decay, with the upper limbs release and recovery, and the outsweep phases originating variability between butterfly cycles. Skill levels contrasted in technical and strategic features at sprint breaststroke and butterfly but showed similar velocity variability between consecutive swimming cycles.
蛙泳和蝶泳是复杂的游泳技术,需要精细的运动技能才能成功完成,在考虑游泳者的专业水平时,推进力和阻力之间的协调和一致的相互作用是决定性的。本研究分析了两组游泳运动员在一个泳姿周期内的技术变化。20 名优秀游泳运动员和 15 名国家级游泳运动员分别完成了 25 米蛙泳和 25 米蝶泳冲刺,水下摄像机以 120Hz 的频率在矢状面记录图像。对连续泳姿周期(优秀运动员:5 个蛙泳/蝶泳,国家级运动员:8 个蛙泳/7 个蝶泳)进行平均速度、最大速度和最小速度、划频和距离、周期内速度变化和各阶段相对持续时间的计算。蛙泳中两个最高峰值和中间的一个较低峰值也进行了分析。采用方差分析、协方差分析和统计参数映射对泳姿周期和组间进行分析。优秀游泳运动员和国家级游泳运动员在蛙泳的平均速度、最大速度、第一和第二峰值以及两个峰值之间的最小速度方面存在差异(1.30±0.02 比 1.15±0.02m/s,2.13±0.05 比 1.88±0.06m/s,1.63±0.05 比 1.48±0.05m/s,2.13±0.05 比 1.86±0.05m/s,1.33±0.04 比 1.23±0.04m/s),在蝶泳的平均速度、最大速度、最小速度、划频和周期内速度变化方面也存在差异(1.65±0.01 比 1.50±0.01m/s,2.20±0.04 比 2.09±0.04m/s,1.12±0.04 比 0.79±0.04m/s,(57.9±0.9 比 54.9±1.0 个/分钟,18.4±1.3 比 23.7±1.3 个/分钟)。优秀和国家级游泳运动员在蛙泳的泳姿周期内表现出一致的运动学变化,但在蝶泳中由于上肢的释放和恢复,以及外摆阶段的出现,导致蝶泳周期之间的速度变化。在短距离蛙泳和蝶泳中,技术水平和战术特征存在差异,但在连续游泳周期中表现出相似的速度变化。