• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分子生物学中基于团队学习的动态过程:来自本科医学生的见解与思考

Dynamics of Team-Based Learning in Molecular Biology: Insights and Reflections From Undergraduate Medical Students.

作者信息

Jaleel Anila, Aziz Umair, Jaleel Shahila, Farid Ghulam, Bashir Zahid, Hassaan Sikander Rana Muhammad

机构信息

Biochemistry, Shalamar Medical and Dental College, Lahore, PAK.

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayed al-Nahyan Medical and Dental College, Lahore, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Dec 22;16(12):e76180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76180. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.76180
PMID:39840165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11748187/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the dynamics of collaborative learning in team-based learning (TBL) through students' reflections and feedback.

METHODS

A phenomenological mixed-methods approach was adopted where the survey and reflections were conducted concurrently after the TBL session and the results were analyzed. The study employed a mini-cluster technique to include all first-year MBBS students of batch 2023-24 with an age range between 19 and 22 years. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from feedback and reflections submitted by 107 first-year MBBS students at the end of the TBL session.

RESULTS

The study found five main themes related to students' engagement with the session, i.e., (1) conceptual clarity as the foundation, (2) collaborative learning culture, (3) communication skills, (4) informative and useful team discussions, and (5) interactive learning for team development. The majority of the respondents, 93 (87%), listened to classmates and coordinated with group members in discussion; 77 (72%) were willing to learn from other group members and contribute ideas to them; 79 (74%) came prepared for the session; and 75 (70%) found learning material assigned to them as appropriate. Respondents had positive perceptions regarding their participation in group work and were strongly inclined to agree with the statements provided.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the positive effects of TBL in promoting peer-to-peer engagement, active engagement, teamwork skills, and knowledge sharing among undergraduate medical students, ultimately contributing to an effective learning experience.

摘要

目的

通过学生的反思和反馈来调查基于团队学习(TBL)中的协作学习动态。

方法

采用现象学混合方法,在TBL课程结束后同时进行调查和反思,并对结果进行分析。该研究采用小型聚类技术,纳入了2023 - 2024批次的所有一年级医学学士学生,年龄在19至22岁之间。从107名一年级医学学士学生在TBL课程结束时提交的反馈和反思中收集定性和定量数据。

结果

该研究发现了与学生参与课程相关的五个主要主题,即:(1)概念清晰是基础;(2)协作学习文化;(3)沟通技巧;(4)信息丰富且有用的团队讨论;(5)促进团队发展的互动学习。大多数受访者,93人(87%)在讨论中倾听同学意见并与小组成员协调;77人(72%)愿意向其他小组成员学习并为他们贡献想法;79人(74%)为课程做好了准备;75人(70%)认为分配给他们的学习材料合适。受访者对自己参与小组工作有积极的看法,并强烈倾向于同意所提供的陈述。

结论

该研究强调了TBL在促进本科医学生之间的 peer-to-peer 参与、积极参与、团队合作技能和知识共享方面的积极作用,最终促成有效的学习体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd35/11748187/946a192a6a94/cureus-0016-00000076180-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd35/11748187/16d6dbcda060/cureus-0016-00000076180-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd35/11748187/470e5f47cb54/cureus-0016-00000076180-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd35/11748187/946a192a6a94/cureus-0016-00000076180-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd35/11748187/16d6dbcda060/cureus-0016-00000076180-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd35/11748187/470e5f47cb54/cureus-0016-00000076180-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd35/11748187/946a192a6a94/cureus-0016-00000076180-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamics of Team-Based Learning in Molecular Biology: Insights and Reflections From Undergraduate Medical Students.分子生物学中基于团队学习的动态过程:来自本科医学生的见解与思考
Cureus. 2024 Dec 22;16(12):e76180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76180. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Using team-based learning to optimize undergraduate family medicine clerkship training: mixed methods study.运用团队学习优化本科生家庭医学实习培训:混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04240-1.
3
Are Online Synchronous Team-Based-Learning (TBL) pedagogy effective?: Perspectives from a study on medical students in Oman.基于团队的在线同步学习(TBL)教学法是否有效?:来自阿曼医学生研究的观点。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Jan;10(1):12-21. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2021.92361.1481.
4
From Theory to Practice: The Impact of Team-Based Learning on Medical Students' Communication Skills.从理论到实践:基于团队的学习对医学生沟通技巧的影响。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Feb 21;14(1):74-84. doi: 10.5334/pme.1595. eCollection 2025.
5
Interprofessional team-based learning (TBL): how do students engage?跨专业团队学习(TBL):学生如何参与?
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02024-5.
6
Online team based learning in teaching Biochemistry for first year MBBS students during COVID-19 pandemic.在线团队学习在 COVID-19 大流行期间为一年级 MBBS 学生教授生物化学
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2022 Jan;50(1):124-129. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21598. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
Team Based Learning (TBL) in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中的团队式学习(TBL)。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Aug;24(8):553-6.
8
Is learning outcome after team based learning influenced by gender and academic standing?基于团队的学习后的学习成果会受到性别和学业成绩的影响吗?
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Jan;47(1):58-66. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21197. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
9
Team-based learning increases active engagement and enhances development of teamwork and communication skills in a first-year course for veterinary and animal science undergraduates.基于团队的学习增加了主动参与度,并在兽医和动物科学本科一年级课程中提高了团队合作和沟通技能的培养。
J Vet Med Educ. 2013 Winter;40(4):333-41. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0213-034R1.
10
Implementation of modified team-based learning within a problem based learning medical curriculum: a focus group study.在基于问题的医学课程中实施改良的团队学习:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1172-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Modern techniques of teaching and learning in medical education: a descriptive literature review.医学教育中的现代教学技术:描述性文献综述
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Jan 21;10:18. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000018.1. eCollection 2021.
2
Employment of Small-Group Discussions to Ensure the Effective Delivery of Medical Education.采用小组讨论以确保医学教育的有效实施。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 21;16(1):e52655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52655. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
The efficacy of team-based learning in developing the generic capability of problem-solving ability and critical thinking skills in nursing education: A systematic review.
团队学习在培养护理教育中通用能力——问题解决能力和批判性思维技能方面的效果:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Mar;122:105704. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105704. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
Effect of team-based learning on critical thinking: A quasi-experimental study.基于团队的学习对批判性思维的影响:一项准实验研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Nov-Dec;38(8):2234-2238. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.8.6146.
5
To What Extent Do Faculty and Students Believe that Team-Based Learning Supports Important Goals of Undergraduate Medical Education?教师和学生在多大程度上认为基于团队的学习有助于本科医学教育的重要目标?
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Sep 13;32(5):1107-1116. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01632-8. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Team-based learning (TBL): Each phase matters! An empirical study to explore the importance of each phase of TBL.基于团队的学习(TBL):每个阶段都很重要!一项探索TBL各阶段重要性的实证研究。
Med Teach. 2022 Oct;44(10):1125-1132. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2064736. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.基于问题的学习方法在本科医学教育中的有效性:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8.
8
Are Online Synchronous Team-Based-Learning (TBL) pedagogy effective?: Perspectives from a study on medical students in Oman.基于团队的在线同步学习(TBL)教学法是否有效?:来自阿曼医学生研究的观点。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Jan;10(1):12-21. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2021.92361.1481.
9
Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning.学生对基于问题的学习中学术参与度和师生关系的认知
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 28;12:713057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057. eCollection 2021.
10
Team-based learning versus Traditional lecture-based learning: An investigation of students' perceptions and academic achievements.基于团队的学习与传统的基于讲座的学习:对学生认知和学业成绩的调查。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):1080-1085. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.4.4000.