• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椎板切除术后腰椎退变的进展

Progression of Lumbar Spine Degeneration After Laminectomy.

作者信息

Hashimoto Kunihiko, Kitaguchi Kazuma, Tateiwa Daisuke, Oshima Kazuya, Wada Eiji

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Center, Osaka International Medical and Science Center, Osaka, JPN.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sumitomo Hospital, Osaka, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Dec 20;16(12):e76097. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76097. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.76097
PMID:39840186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11747853/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) is a common degenerative lumbar spinal disease (DLSD) widely treated by decompression surgery, also known as laminectomy. Few cases have been observed where DLSD has progressed postoperatively, thus requiring reoperation. However, data on such cases are limited.

METHODS

We included 247 patients (148 men and 99 women; mean age = 73.3 years) with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years in this single-center retrospective study. Among them, 129 patients underwent bilateral partial laminectomy (BPL), 91 patients underwent lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy (LSPSL), and 27 underwent microendoscopic laminotomy (MEL).

RESULTS

Of all the patients, 34 (13.8%) exhibited progression of lumbar spine degeneration symptoms, with nine (3.6%) requiring reoperation. Over 90% of new symptoms developed within one year of the initial surgery. Reoperation rates were significantly higher in patients with foraminal stenosis (P = <0.001). Additionally, 35 patients (14.2%) exhibited slippage progression. LSPSL resulted in significantly less slippage progression (P = 0.026). Spinal canal and foraminal stenosis were significantly associated with slippage progression (P< 0.001 and P = 0.010, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LSPSL reduced the incidence of canal and foraminal stenosis. Symptomatic DLSD was more common within one year post surgery, with foraminal stenosis more frequently requiring reoperation.

摘要

引言

腰椎管狭窄症(LCS)是一种常见的退变性腰椎疾病(DLSD),广泛采用减压手术治疗,即椎板切除术。观察到少数DLSD病例在术后病情进展,因此需要再次手术。然而,关于此类病例的数据有限。

方法

在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们纳入了247例患者(148例男性和99例女性;平均年龄 = 73.3岁),平均随访2.3年。其中,129例患者接受了双侧部分椎板切除术(BPL),91例患者接受了腰椎棘突劈开椎板切除术(LSPSL),27例接受了显微内镜下椎板切开术(MEL)。

结果

在所有患者中,34例(13.8%)出现腰椎退变症状进展,9例(3.6%)需要再次手术。超过90%的新症状在初次手术后一年内出现。椎间孔狭窄患者的再次手术率显著更高(P = <0.001)。此外,35例患者(14.2%)出现滑脱进展。LSPSL导致的滑脱进展显著更少(P = 0.026)。椎管和椎间孔狭窄与滑脱进展显著相关(分别为P<0.001和P = 0.010)。

结论

LSPSL降低了椎管和椎间孔狭窄的发生率。有症状的DLSD在术后一年内更为常见,椎间孔狭窄更常需要再次手术。

相似文献

1
Progression of Lumbar Spine Degeneration After Laminectomy.椎板切除术后腰椎退变的进展
Cureus. 2024 Dec 20;16(12):e76097. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76097. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.腰椎管狭窄后路棘突劈开椎管减压术后切口疼痛减轻:一项随机对照研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jan;14(1):51-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09933. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
3
Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.改良腰椎棘突劈开椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的手术疗效
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):353-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE1457. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
4
Radiological Analysis of Minimally Invasive Microscopic Laminectomy for Lumbar Canal Stenosis with a Focus on Multilevel Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis.微创显微镜下腰椎管狭窄症的放射学分析,重点是多节段狭窄和脊椎滑脱。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e224-e234. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.079. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.双侧椎板切开术或全椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的长期临床疗效:单中心经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18651.
6
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.与传统椎板切除术相比,后路减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11;2015(3):CD010036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010036.pub2.
7
Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note.腰椎管狭窄症的腰椎棘突劈开椎板切除术。技术说明。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Nov;3(5):405-8. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.3.5.0405.
8
Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.经旁正中或中线入路在内镜手术辅助下行L4/5节段腰椎管狭窄症的管状手术。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(2):2309499018782546. doi: 10.1177/2309499018782546.
9
Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article.显微镜下腰椎棘突劈开式椎板切除术的临床疗效:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):187-94. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE1373. Epub 2014 May 30.
10
Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy and Trans-Interspinous Lumbar Decompression.两种不同微创减压手术方法治疗腰椎管狭窄症的短期临床结果和影像学变化比较:腰椎棘突劈开椎板切除术和经棘突间腰椎减压术。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Nov 1;46(21):E1136-E1145. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004052.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgery in degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion improve outcome in subgroups? A secondary analysis from a randomized trial (NORDSTEN trial).退行性腰椎滑脱症的手术治疗:融合术对亚组患者的预后有改善作用吗?一项随机试验(NORDSTEN试验)的二次分析
Spine J. 2023 Nov;23(11):1613-1622. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.386. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Radiological Definitions of Sagittal Plane Segmental Instability in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine - A Systematic Review.退行性腰椎矢状面节段性不稳定的放射学定义——一项系统综述
Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):523-533. doi: 10.1177/21925682221099854. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Spinous-Process-Splitting Versus Conventional Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Comparative Study with Respect to Short-Term Postoperative Pain and Analgesics Use.
棘突劈开与常规减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:短期术后疼痛和镇痛药使用的比较研究。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:e80-e87. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.094. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
4
Bilateral laminotomy through a unilateral approach (minimally invasive) versus open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧入路双侧椎板切开术(微创)与开放性椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;35(2):161-165. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1777253. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
5
Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Reoperation Rate for Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎狭窄症的长期临床疗效及再手术率。
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e465-e472. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.105. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Comparison of minimally invasive decompression and combined minimally invasive decompression and fusion in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis with instability.退行性腰椎滑脱伴不稳患者的微创减压与微创减压联合融合的比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Nov;57:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
7
Short-term and long-term revision rates after lumbar spine discectomy versus laminectomy: a population-based cohort study.腰椎间盘切除术与椎板切除术后的短期和长期翻修率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 17;8(7):e021028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021028.
8
Iatrogenic Spondylolisthesis Following Open Lumbar Laminectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature.医源性腰椎滑脱症:病例系列和文献复习。
World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e383-e390. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.039. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation.术前椎体后移作为减压术后腰椎间盘突出症的一个危险因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Apr;24(4):592-601. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.SPINE15288. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
10
Prognostic Factors of Surgical Outcome after Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症棘突劈开椎板切除术后手术结果的预后因素
Asian Spine J. 2015 Oct;9(5):705-12. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.705. Epub 2015 Sep 22.