Suppr超能文献

迈向粪便胆汁酸的常规高通量分析:在全自动临床化学分析仪上对用于定量人粪便样本中总胆汁酸的酶循环法的验证。

Towards routine high-throughput analysis of fecal bile acids: validation of an enzymatic cycling method for the quantification of total bile acids in human stool samples on fully automated clinical chemistry analyzers.

作者信息

Masetto Angelique, Leber Tina, Frömel Tobias, Peter Christoph, Prager Kai, Grimmler Matthias

机构信息

Institute for Biomolecular Research, Hochschulen Fresenius gemeinnützige Trägergesellschaft mbH, University of Applied Sciences, Idstein, Germany.

52775 DiaSys Diagnostic Systems GmbH , Holzheim, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Jan 23;63(7):1366-1375. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1414. Print 2025 Jun 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bile acid diarrhea is a common but underdiagnosed condition. Because the gold standard test (SeHCAT) is time-consuming and not widely available, fecal bile acid excretion is typically assessed by chromatography and mass spectrometry. Although enzymatic cycling assays are well established for the rapid and cost-effective analysis of total bile acids (TBA) in serum or plasma, their full potential has yet not been extended to stool samples in clinical routine.

METHODS

The performance of the 'Total bile acids 21 FS' reagent (DiaSys) was evaluated in fecal matrix according to CLSI guidelines and EU-IVD Regulations (2017/745), and compared to an established microplate-based kit (IDK) by measuring patient stool samples (n=122). Method agreement was assessed by Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analysis. The quantification of eight individual BAs was assessed using HPLC-MS/MS as reference method.

RESULTS

The DiaSys assay showed linearity between 3.5 and 130 μmol/L, good repeatability, total precision, and reproducibility with CVs of 1.7 %, 3.5 %, and 3.0 %. Limit of blank (LoB), detection (LoD), and quantitation (LoQ) were ≤0.17, ≤0.3, and 3.5 μmol/L, respectively. No significant interference from endogenous substances was observed. The methods showed good correlation up to 140 μmol/L (r=0.988), despite differences in the quantification of individual BAs, with mean deviations of 7 % (DiaSys) and 31 % (IDK), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of enzymatic TBA analysis on fully automated clinical chemistry platforms can be exploited for the routine analysis of stool samples. However, cycling assays may benefit from reference standards that take into account the composition of the fecal BA pool.

摘要

目的

胆汁酸腹泻是一种常见但诊断不足的病症。由于金标准检测(SeHCAT)耗时且应用不广泛,粪便胆汁酸排泄通常通过色谱法和质谱法进行评估。尽管酶循环测定法已成熟用于血清或血浆中总胆汁酸(TBA)的快速且经济高效的分析,但其全部潜力尚未扩展至临床常规的粪便样本分析。

方法

根据CLSI指南和欧盟体外诊断医疗器械法规(2017/745),在粪便基质中评估“总胆汁酸21 FS”试剂(DiaSys)的性能,并通过测量患者粪便样本(n = 122)与已确立的基于微孔板的试剂盒(IDK)进行比较。通过Passing - Bablok分析和Bland - Altman分析评估方法一致性。使用HPLC - MS/MS作为参考方法评估八种个体胆汁酸的定量。

结果

DiaSys测定法在3.5至130μmol/L之间显示出线性,具有良好的重复性、总精密度和再现性,变异系数分别为1.7%、3.5%和3.0%。空白限(LoB)、检测限(LoD)和定量限(LoQ)分别≤0.17、≤0.3和3.5μmol/L。未观察到内源性物质的显著干扰。尽管个体胆汁酸定量存在差异,但两种方法在高达140μmol/L时显示出良好的相关性(r = 0.988),平均偏差分别为7%(DiaSys)和31%(IDK)。

结论

酶促TBA分析在全自动临床化学平台上的优势可用于粪便样本的常规分析。然而,循环测定法可能受益于考虑粪便胆汁酸池组成的参考标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验