Gustavsson Hugo, Meyer Frida, Fahlander Sara, Ölwegård Birgitta, Jonasson Hanna, Toll Rani, Henricson Joakim, Wilhelms Daniel
Department of Emergency Medicine in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 582 25, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Jan 22;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00714-2.
This study aimed to investigate whether changes in capillary refill (CR) time precede macrovascular signs of deterioration in a human model of blood loss shock. The study was conducted at the Department of Emergency Medicine in Linköping, Sweden, and involved 42 healthy volunteers aged 18-45. Participants were randomized into two provocations of applied lower body negative pressure (LBNP): a stepwise escalation protocol and a direct application protocol, to simulate gradual and acute blood loss. The main outcome measure was CR time. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, heart rate, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance were measured continuously. CR time was assessed on the finger pulp using a standardized pressure and measured with a polarized reflectance imaging system.
The provocation elicited pre-syncope reactions and clear decrease in blood pressure for all participants, yet two-thirds of the participants in both protocols reacted with shorter CR times at maximum provocation, and the overall median CR time decreased by 0.2 s (Wilcoxon W = - 395.0, range: - 6.3 to 3.2, IQR - 1.3 to 0.1, P = 0.0070). Participants with shorter CR times exhibited comparatively greater increases in systemic vascular resistance and a more pronounced decrease in cardiac output.
Our findings reveal that finger CR time paradoxically decreases in a majority of healthy volunteers in a lower body negative pressure model of blood loss, challenging traditional assumptions about the CR test's reliability as a shock indicator in its present interpretation.
本研究旨在调查在失血性休克人体模型中,毛细血管再充盈(CR)时间的变化是否先于大血管功能恶化的体征出现。该研究在瑞典林雪平的急诊医学部进行,纳入了42名年龄在18至45岁之间的健康志愿者。参与者被随机分为两种下体负压(LBNP)诱发方式:逐步升级方案和直接应用方案,以模拟渐进性和急性失血。主要结局指标是CR时间。连续测量收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压、心率、心输出量和全身血管阻力。使用标准化压力在手指指腹评估CR时间,并通过偏振反射成像系统进行测量。
所有参与者在诱发过程中均出现了前驱晕厥反应和血压明显下降,但在两种方案中,三分之二的参与者在最大诱发时CR时间缩短,总体中位数CR时间减少了0.2秒(Wilcoxon W = - 395.0,范围:- 6.3至3.2,四分位间距-1.3至0.1,P = 0.0070)。CR时间较短的参与者全身血管阻力增加幅度相对较大,心输出量下降更为明显。
我们的研究结果表明,在失血性下体负压模型中,大多数健康志愿者的手指CR时间反而缩短,这对目前将CR测试作为休克指标的可靠性的传统假设提出了挑战。