Osorno Raquel A, Ahmadi Maryam, O'Hora Kathleen P, Solomon Natalie L, Lopez Mateo, Morehouse Allison B, Kim Jane P, Manber Rachel, Goldstein-Piekarski Andrea N
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA; Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Feb;182:319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.01.011. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
The COVID-19 Pandemic increased the prevalence and severity of insomnia and depression symptoms. The effects of an insomnia intervention on future insomnia and depression symptoms delivered during an ongoing stressor, which may have precipitated the insomnia symptoms, is unknown. We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled pilot study to evaluate whether an insomnia intervention would improve the trajectory of insomnia and depression symptoms in the context of a global pandemic. Forty-nine individuals with clinically significant insomnia symptoms that emerged after the start of the COVID-19 Pandemic were randomized to one of two groups: one group received four sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) over five weeks via telehealth, and the other was assigned to a 28-week waitlist control group. Participants completed assessments of insomnia and depressive symptom severity at baseline (week 0) and at weeks 1-6, 12, and 28. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate treatment efficacy. The MacArthur model was used to test whether improvement in insomnia symptoms mediated subsequent improvement in mood. The CBT-I group showed improved trajectories of insomnia (b = -1.03, p < 0.005, 95% CI [-1.53, -0.53]) and depressive symptoms (b = -0.47, p = 0.007, [-0.80, -0.13]) across the 28 weeks compared to the control group. The rate of improvement of insomnia symptoms during treatment mediated the subsequent improvement in depressive symptom severity following treatment (b = 2.10, p = 0.024, [0.30, 3.90]). Although the sample size was small, these results underscore the potential CBT-I in the context of an ongoing stressor to not only alleviate insomnia symptoms, but also improve depressive symptoms.
新冠疫情增加了失眠和抑郁症状的患病率及严重程度。在可能引发失眠症状的持续应激源期间进行的失眠干预对未来失眠和抑郁症状的影响尚不清楚。我们开展了一项双臂随机对照试验性研究,以评估在全球大流行背景下,失眠干预是否会改善失眠和抑郁症状的发展轨迹。49名在新冠疫情开始后出现具有临床意义的失眠症状的个体被随机分为两组:一组通过远程医疗在五周内接受了四个疗程的失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I),另一组被分配到28周的等待列表对照组。参与者在基线(第0周)以及第1 - 6周、12周和28周完成了失眠和抑郁症状严重程度的评估。使用线性混合效应模型评估治疗效果。采用麦克阿瑟模型来检验失眠症状的改善是否介导了随后情绪的改善。与对照组相比,CBT-I组在28周内失眠(b = -1.03,p < 0.005,95% CI [-1.53, -0.53])和抑郁症状(b = -0.47,p = 0.007,[-0.80, -0.13])的发展轨迹有所改善。治疗期间失眠症状的改善速度介导了治疗后抑郁症状严重程度的后续改善(b = 2.10,p = 0.024,[0.30, 3.90])。尽管样本量较小,但这些结果强调了在持续应激源背景下CBT-I不仅能缓解失眠症状,还能改善抑郁症状的潜力。