Beumer Wieke Y, Reilingh Annemarie Y A M, Dalmijn Eline, Roseboom Tessa J, van Ditzhuijzen Jenneke
Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):45-62. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12293. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of recent studies in peer reviewed journals investigating self-reported motivations to have an abortion or to continue an unwanted pregnancy in different countries and settings, including both qualitative and quantitative results.
We searched for English language publications published between 2008 and 2023 indexed in four scientific databases. We included studies if they captured people's own motivations for abortion and/ or for continuing an unwanted pregnancy.
Of the included 19 studies, all focused on abortion, and four also included motivations to carry an initially unwanted pregnancy to term. Motivations for abortion often related to family planning (e.g., complete family, no desire for children, not the right time), the relationship with the person involved in the pregnancy, and life or material circumstances (such as financial resources, housing or future plans), and sometimes with stigma, shame, or expected negative reactions. Motivations to continue an unwanted pregnancy were having a supportive partner and personal beliefs about the pregnancy. Despite different settings, different methods, and methodological limitations, studies showed similar multifactorial and interrelated motivations in decision making around unwanted pregnancies.
This research showed that in different places throughout the world multiple interrelated motivations play a role in a decision to have an abortion or to continue an unwanted pregnancy. The findings mainly provide insight into retrospective explanatory accounts, which may be biased because respondents may feel the need to justify their choice. Future research should discontinue asking people to rationalize unwanted pregnancy decisions.
本范围综述的目的是概述同行评审期刊中最近的研究,这些研究调查了不同国家和环境下自我报告的堕胎动机或继续意外怀孕的动机,包括定性和定量结果。
我们检索了四个科学数据库中2008年至2023年期间发表的英文出版物。如果研究涉及人们自身的堕胎动机和/或继续意外怀孕的动机,我们就将其纳入。
在纳入的19项研究中,所有研究都聚焦于堕胎,其中四项研究还纳入了将最初意外怀孕维持至足月的动机。堕胎动机通常与计划生育有关(例如,家庭完整、不想要孩子、时机不对)、与怀孕相关人员的关系以及生活或物质状况(如经济资源、住房或未来计划),有时还与耻辱感、羞耻感或预期的负面反应有关。继续意外怀孕的动机包括有一个支持自己的伴侣以及对怀孕的个人信念。尽管研究背景、方法不同且存在方法学局限性,但研究表明,在意外怀孕决策方面存在类似的多因素且相互关联的动机。
这项研究表明,在世界各地不同地方,多种相互关联的动机在堕胎或继续意外怀孕的决策中发挥作用。研究结果主要提供了对回顾性解释性叙述的见解,这些叙述可能存在偏差,因为受访者可能觉得有必要为自己的选择辩护。未来的研究应停止要求人们为意外怀孕决策进行合理化解释。