Camper Benjamin Thomas, Kanes Andrew Stephen, Laughlin Zachary Tyler, Manuel Riley Tate, Bewick Sharon Anne
Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29631, USA.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Microbiome. 2025 Jan 22;13(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01994-8.
Hybridization between evolutionary lineages has profound impacts on the fitness and ecology of hybrid progeny. In extreme cases, the effects of hybridization can transcend ecological timescales by introducing trait novelty upon which evolution can act. Indeed, hybridization can even have macroevolutionary consequences, for example, as a driver of adaptive radiations and evolutionary innovations. Accordingly, hybridization is now recognized as a motor for macrobial evolution. By contrast, there has been substantially less progress made towards understanding the positive eco-evolutionary consequences of hybridization on holobionts. Rather, the emerging paradigm in holobiont literature is that hybridization disrupts symbiosis between a host lineage and its microbiome, leaving hybrids at a fitness deficit. These conclusions, however, have been drawn based on results from predominantly low-fitness hybrid organisms. Studying "dead-end" hybrids all but guarantees finding that hybridization is detrimental. This is the pitfall that Dobzhansky fell into over 80 years ago when he used hybrid sterility and inviability to conclude that hybridization hinders evolution. Goldschmidt, however, argued that rare saltational successes-so-called hopeful monsters-disproportionately drive positive evolutionary outcomes. Goldschmidt's view is now becoming a widely accepted explanation for the prevalence of historical hybridization in extant macrobial lineages. Aligning holobiont research with this broader evolutionary perspective requires recognizing the importance of similar patterns in host-microbiome systems. That is, rare and successful "hopeful holobionts" (i.e., hopeful monsters at the holobiont scale) might be disproportionately responsible for holobiont evolution. If true, then it is these successful systems that we should be studying to assess impacts of hybridization on the macroevolutionary trajectories of host-microbiome symbioses.
In this paper, we explore the effects of hybridization on the gut (cloacal) and skin microbiota in an ecologically successful hybrid lizard, Aspidoscelis neomexicanus. Specifically, we test the hypothesis that hybrid lizards have host-associated (HA) microbiota traits strongly differentiated from their progenitor species. Across numerous hybrid microbiota phenotypes, we find widespread evidence of transgressive segregation. Further, microbiota restructuring broadly correlates with niche restructuring during hybridization. This suggests a relationship between HA microbiota traits and ecological success.
Transgressive segregation of HA microbiota traits is not only limited to hybrids at a fitness deficit but also occurs in ecologically successful hybrids. This suggests that hybridization may be a mechanism for generating novel and potentially beneficial holobiont phenotypes. Supporting such a conclusion, the correlations that we find between hybrid microbiota and the hybrid niche indicate that hybridization might change host microbiota in ways that promote a shift or an expansion in host niche space. If true, hybrid microbiota restructuring may underly ecological release from progenitors. This, in turn, could drive evolutionary diversification. Using our system as an example, we elaborate on the evolutionary implications of host hybridization within the context of holobiont theory and then outline the next steps for understanding the role of hybridization in holobiont research. Video Abstract.
进化谱系之间的杂交对杂交后代的适应性和生态具有深远影响。在极端情况下,杂交的影响可以通过引入可供进化作用的新性状超越生态时间尺度。实际上,杂交甚至可以产生宏观进化后果,例如,作为适应性辐射和进化创新的驱动力。因此,杂交现在被认为是宏观生物进化的一个推动因素。相比之下,在理解杂交对全生物的积极生态进化后果方面取得的进展要少得多。相反,全生物文献中出现的范式是杂交会破坏宿主谱系与其微生物组之间的共生关系,使杂交种在适应性上处于劣势。然而,这些结论是基于主要来自低适应性杂交生物的结果得出的。研究“无前途”杂交种几乎肯定会发现杂交是有害的。这就是80多年前多布赞斯基所陷入的陷阱,当时他利用杂交不育和不活来得出杂交阻碍进化的结论。然而,戈德施密特认为,罕见的跃变式成功——即所谓的有希望的怪物——对积极的进化结果的推动作用不成比例。戈德施密特的观点现在正成为对现存宏观生物谱系中历史杂交普遍存在的一种广泛接受的解释。将全生物研究与这一更广泛的进化观点相结合需要认识到宿主-微生物组系统中类似模式的重要性。也就是说,罕见且成功的“有希望的全生物”(即全生物尺度上的有希望的怪物)可能对全生物进化负有不成比例的责任。如果这是真的,那么我们应该研究这些成功的系统,以评估杂交对宿主-微生物组共生关系宏观进化轨迹的影响。
在本文中,我们研究了杂交对一种生态上成功的杂交蜥蜴——新墨西哥鞭尾蜥肠道(泄殖腔)和皮肤微生物群的影响。具体来说,我们检验了这样一个假设:杂交蜥蜴具有与宿主相关的(HA)微生物群特征,这些特征与其亲本物种有很大差异。在众多杂交微生物群表型中,我们发现了广泛的超亲分离证据。此外,微生物群重组与杂交过程中的生态位重组大致相关。这表明HA微生物群特征与生态成功之间存在关联。
HA微生物群特征的超亲分离不仅限于适应性不足的杂交种,也发生在生态上成功的杂交种中。这表明杂交可能是产生新的且可能有益的全生物表型的一种机制。支持这一结论的是,我们发现杂交微生物群与杂交生态位之间的相关性表明,杂交可能以促进宿主生态位空间转移或扩展的方式改变宿主微生物群。如果这是真的,杂交微生物群重组可能是从亲本生态释放的基础。反过来,这可能推动进化多样化。以我们的系统为例,我们在全生物理论的背景下阐述了宿主杂交的进化意义,然后概述了理解杂交在全生物研究中作用的下一步计划。视频摘要。