Moulton Jessica E, Botfield Jessica R, Arefadib Noushin, Freilich Karen, Mazza Danielle
SPHERE, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Family Planning NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Oct;81(10):6679-6694. doi: 10.1111/jan.16777. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
To assess the acceptability and perceived feasibility of integrating a co-designed nurse-led model of contraception and medication abortion care within rural and regional general practices.
Qualitative exploratory design utilising Sidani and Braden's indicators of acceptability and feasibility.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 practice nurses, 8 general practitioners and 3 practice managers who currently or previously worked in rural, regional or remote general practice. Participants were recruited purposively through social media, partner organisation newsletters and snowballing. During the interview, participants were presented with an overview of the co-designed model of care and asked specific questions to gain feedback on its acceptability and perceived feasibility. Data were analysed in NVivo using template analysis and iterative categorisation. Findings were mapped according to Sidani and Braden's indicators of acceptability and feasibility.
Three overarching themes were identified: nurses are acceptable providers, factors influencing the feasibility of the model and factors supporting greater feasibility of the model. Participants found the nurse-led model acceptable, describing nurses as suitable and sometimes preferred providers of long-acting reversible contraception and abortion care in rural and regional settings. They also perceived the model as feasible, citing similarities to existing care processes such as infant immunisations and chronic disease management, contributing to its feasibility. However, contextual factors such as the need to adapt the model to each clinic and patient's unique needs, foster strong general practitioner-practice nurse professional relationships and ensure that staff have shared values and adequate training for contraception and abortion provision were described as critical for feasibility.
Overall, participants found the nurse-led model of care to be acceptable and feasible for implementation in rural and regional general practices. This perception carries important implications for policy and practice, highlighting the need for supportive policies to enhance the effectiveness of such models across Australian general practice.
Our findings emphasise the need for initiatives aimed at addressing inadequate funding for nurse-led care, improving documentation of this care, enhancing understanding among general practitioners and nurses regarding the scope of practice for practice nurses, and overcoming training barriers specific to rural areas. These measures are essential for enabling nurse-led models of contraception and medication abortion to function effectively in practice.
This paper is reported according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.
Two consumer representatives contributed to the development of the co-design methodology as members of the ORIENT Intervention Advisory Group Governance Committee.
评估在农村和地区全科医疗中整合共同设计的由护士主导的避孕和药物流产护理模式的可接受性和感知可行性。
采用西达尼和布雷登的可接受性和可行性指标的定性探索性设计。
我们对12名执业护士、8名全科医生和3名执业经理进行了半结构式访谈,他们目前或以前在农村、地区或偏远的全科医疗工作。通过社交媒体、合作组织通讯和滚雪球抽样的方式有目的地招募参与者。在访谈中,向参与者介绍了共同设计的护理模式概况,并询问了一些具体问题,以获取他们对该模式可接受性和感知可行性的反馈。使用NVivo软件,通过模板分析和迭代分类对数据进行分析。根据西达尼和布雷登的可接受性和可行性指标对研究结果进行梳理。
确定了三个总体主题:护士是可接受的提供者、影响该模式可行性的因素以及支持该模式更高可行性的因素。参与者认为由护士主导的模式是可接受的,将护士描述为农村和地区环境中长效可逆避孕和流产护理的合适提供者,有时甚至是首选提供者。他们还认为该模式是可行的,指出其与婴儿免疫接种和慢性病管理等现有护理流程有相似之处,这有助于其可行性。然而,一些背景因素,如需要使该模式适应每个诊所和患者的独特需求、培养全科医生与执业护士之间牢固的专业关系,以及确保工作人员对避孕和流产服务有共同的价值观和足够的培训,被描述为可行性的关键。
总体而言,参与者认为由护士主导的护理模式在农村和地区全科医疗中是可接受且可行的。这种认知对政策和实践具有重要意义,突出了需要支持性政策来提高此类模式在澳大利亚全科医疗中的有效性。
我们的研究结果强调需要采取举措,解决护士主导护理资金不足的问题,改善此类护理的记录,增进全科医生和护士对执业护士执业范围的理解,并克服农村地区特有的培训障碍。这些措施对于使护士主导的避孕和药物流产模式在实践中有效发挥作用至关重要。
本文按照定性研究报告的综合标准(COREQ)指南进行报告。
两名消费者代表作为ORIENT干预咨询小组治理委员会的成员,参与了共同设计方法的制定。