Suppr超能文献

农村地区一家创伤中心接受慢性抗血栓治疗的创伤患者的治疗结果。

Outcomes of trauma patients on chronic antithrombotic therapies in a trauma center in a rural state.

作者信息

Moore Benjamin, Jensen Hanna, Patel Karan, Modi Zeel, Reif Rebecca J, Lal Shibani, Bowman Stephen M, Kost Melissa, Kalkwarf Kyle J, Margolick Joseph, Bhavaraju Avi, Corwin Howard L

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

出版信息

Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Oct 4;15:100221. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100221. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The number of trauma patients presenting with chronic antithrombotic therapy is on the rise. The risk of hemorrhage, the leading cause of death in trauma patients, increases for those on such therapy. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients on warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), or antiplatelet agents.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center with pre-admission antithrombotic therapy. Patients were divided into those on warfarin, DOACs, and antiplatelet agents. The primary outcomes measured were hospital mortality, total blood products received, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS.

RESULTS

738 patients were included in the study: 191 (26 %) warfarin, 260 (35 %) DOACs, and 287 (39 %) antiplatelet. There were no differences in the demographic variables between study groups. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was similar across the three groups as well as blood product usage, reversal agent usage, and mean hospital stay. Multivariable regression showed patients with pre-admission antiplatelet usage were more likely to have a shorter ICU LOS than those on warfarin ( = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Blood product and reversal agent use was similar between patients on warfarin, DOACs, or antiplatelet agents. Patients on antiplatelet agents had a shorter ICU stay than the warfarin group, the only significant difference observed. Our results indicate similar safety profiles of antithrombotic medications in a generic trauma population, likely due to institutional protocols to increase responsiveness and immediate availability of resources when the patient has known anticoagulation.

摘要

目的

接受慢性抗血栓治疗的创伤患者数量正在增加。对于接受此类治疗的患者,出血风险(创伤患者死亡的主要原因)会升高。本研究旨在比较服用华法林、直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)或抗血小板药物的患者的临床结局。

方法

对入住一级创伤中心且入院前接受抗血栓治疗的成年患者进行回顾性队列分析。患者被分为服用华法林、DOAC和抗血小板药物的三组。所测量的主要结局包括医院死亡率、接受的血液制品总量、住院时间(LOS)和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间。

结果

738例患者纳入研究:191例(26%)服用华法林,260例(35%)服用DOAC,287例(39%)服用抗血小板药物。研究组之间的人口统计学变量无差异。三组的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)以及血液制品使用情况、逆转剂使用情况和平均住院时间相似。多变量回归显示,入院前使用抗血小板药物的患者比服用华法林的患者更有可能有较短的ICU住院时间(=0.048)。

结论

服用华法林、DOAC或抗血小板药物的患者之间血液制品和逆转剂的使用情况相似。服用抗血小板药物的患者的ICU住院时间比华法林组短,这是观察到的唯一显著差异。我们的结果表明,在一般创伤人群中,抗血栓药物的安全性概况相似,这可能是由于机构制定了相关方案,以便在患者已知抗凝的情况下提高反应能力并立即提供资源。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验