Alnoor Alameen, Obadiel Yasser A, Saleh Khalil A, Jowah Haitham M
Surgery, Sana'a University, Sana'a City, YEM.
Surgery, Al-Kuwait University Hospital, Sana'a City, YEM.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 22;16(12):e76222. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76222. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Background The critical view of safety (CVS) is a critical technique to minimize the risk of bile duct injuries (BDIs) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study evaluated the rate of CVS achievement and examined factors influencing its success. Methods This prospective study included 97 patients undergoing LC. Data on demographic characteristics, preoperative factors, surgical difficulty, and surgeon experience were collected. CVS achievement was assessed using Strasberg's criteria, and associated factors were analyzed. Results CVS was successfully achieved in 31 of 97 cases (32%), while it was not achieved in 66 cases (68%). Factors significantly associated with failure to achieve CVS included previous abdominal surgery (p = 0.024), prior endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (p = 0.024), acute cholecystitis (p = 0.024), and higher difficulty grades according to the modified Nassar scale (p < 0.001). Although there was no statistically significant difference in CVS achievement between specialists and residents (p = 0.223), specialists had a higher success rate (37.5%) compared to residents (28%). Achieving CVS was associated with shorter operative times (mean: 60 vs. 70 minutes, p < 0.001) and reduced use of postoperative drains (16.1% vs. 83.9%, p < 0.001). Importantly, no BDIs were observed. Conclusion Achieving CVS remains a challenge, particularly in complex cases and patients with prior abdominal interventions or acute inflammation. Enhanced surgical training, meticulous preoperative planning, and the use of adjunctive technologies may improve CVS success rates and contribute to safer outcomes in LC.
背景 安全关键视野(CVS)是一种关键技术,可将腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)期间胆管损伤(BDI)的风险降至最低。本研究评估了CVS达成率,并检查了影响其成功的因素。方法 这项前瞻性研究纳入了97例行LC的患者。收集了人口统计学特征、术前因素、手术难度和外科医生经验的数据。使用斯特拉斯伯格标准评估CVS达成情况,并分析相关因素。结果 97例中有31例(32%)成功实现了CVS,而66例(68%)未实现。与未达成CVS显著相关的因素包括既往腹部手术(p = 0.024)、既往内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)(p = 0.024)、急性胆囊炎(p = 0.024)以及根据改良纳萨尔量表划分的更高难度等级(p < 0.001)。尽管专科医生和住院医生在CVS达成方面无统计学显著差异(p = 0.223),但专科医生的成功率(37.5%)高于住院医生(28%)。实现CVS与较短的手术时间相关(平均:60 vs. 70分钟,p < 0.001)以及术后引流管使用减少(16.1% vs. 83.9%,p < 0.001)。重要的是,未观察到BDI。结论 实现CVS仍然是一项挑战,尤其是在复杂病例以及有既往腹部干预或急性炎症的患者中。加强手术培训、精心的术前规划以及辅助技术的使用可能会提高CVS成功率,并有助于在LC中实现更安全的结果。