Lalisang Arnetta Naomi Louise, Wijaya Davin Nathan, Jamtani Indah, Marbun Vania Myralda Giamour, Sihardo Lam, Ibrahim Febiansyah, Putranto Agi Satria, Jeo Wifanto Saditya, Mazni Yarman, Lalisang Toar Jean Maurice
Clinic of Digestive Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Digestive Surgery, Universitas Indonesia Faculty of Medicine, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Turk J Surg. 2025 Sep 3;41(3):270-276. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6505. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Identifying the critical view of safety (CVS) is crucial in this procedure to prevent complications, but achieving CVS can be challenging, necessitating bailout procedures. This study analyzes factors influencing CVS identification and describes bailout procedures used when CVS identification fails.
We collected data from symptomatic cholelithiasis patients undergoing LC at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from January to October 2023. Factors contributing to CVS identification failure were analyzed, and bailout procedures were described.
Among 107 symptomatic cholelithiasis patients, the mean age was 50.38 years, with the majority being female (55.14% of whom were female). CVS was identified in 88 patients (82.24%). Univariate analysis showed that history of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [odds ratio (OR) 5.46], Bile duct (BD) stent (OR 16.53), and diagnosis of cholecystitis (acute, OR 6.17; chronic; OR 4.00) significantly increased CVS identification failure risk. Multivariate analysis identified BD stent as the only significant risk factor (OR 7.41). Higher failure rates were associated with Parkland scores of 4-5, Nassar scores of 4, and G10 scores of 4-5. Among those with CVS identification failure, 5 completed cholecystectomy via top-down approach, 6 underwent subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy, 6 underwent subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy, and 2 converted to open cholecystectomy.
Predicting CVS identification failure using preoperative parameters and intraoperative scoring systems is crucial for anticipating surgical complexity and ensuring timely intervention. History of ERCP, BD stent presence, and cholecystitis diagnosis were significant predictors of CVS identification failure. Intraoperative scoring systems reliably predicted CVS identification failure.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是有症状胆结石的金标准治疗方法。识别关键安全视野(CVS)在该手术中对于预防并发症至关重要,但实现CVS可能具有挑战性,需要采取补救措施。本研究分析影响CVS识别的因素,并描述CVS识别失败时使用的补救措施。
我们收集了2023年1月至10月在西托·曼贡库苏莫医院接受LC的有症状胆结石患者的数据。分析导致CVS识别失败的因素,并描述补救措施。
在107例有症状胆结石患者中,平均年龄为50.38岁,大多数为女性(其中55.14%为女性)。88例患者(82.24%)识别出了CVS。单因素分析显示,内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)病史[比值比(OR)5.46]、胆管(BD)支架(OR 16.53)以及胆囊炎诊断(急性,OR 6.17;慢性,OR 4.00)显著增加了CVS识别失败的风险。多因素分析确定BD支架是唯一的显著危险因素(OR 7.41)。较高的失败率与帕克蓝德评分为4 - 5、纳萨尔评分为4以及G10评分为4 - 5相关。在CVS识别失败的患者中,5例通过自上而下的方法完成了胆囊切除术,6例接受了次全开窗胆囊切除术,6例接受了次全重建胆囊切除术,2例转为开腹胆囊切除术。
使用术前参数和术中评分系统预测CVS识别失败对于预期手术复杂性和确保及时干预至关重要。ERCP病史、BD支架的存在以及胆囊炎诊断是CVS识别失败的重要预测因素。术中评分系统能够可靠地预测CVS识别失败。