• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代际多样性与团队创新:冲突和共享领导力的作用

Generational diversity and team innovation: the roles of conflict and shared leadership.

作者信息

Wang Lingyi, Duan Xu

机构信息

School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1501633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1501633. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1501633
PMID:39845533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11753251/
Abstract

The increasing generational diversity in modern teams has sparked an ongoing debate about its impact on team performance. Grounded in decision-making and social identity theories, this study explores the multifaceted relationship between generational diversity and team innovation performance, examining the mediating roles of cognitive and affective conflicts and the moderating role of shared leadership. The findings from a three-wave survey of five multi-generational teams in a Chinese organization reveal that generational diversity predicts both cognitive and affective conflicts, which subsequently exert opposing effects on team innovation. Shared leadership positively moderates the relationship between cognitive conflict and team innovation, amplifying the indirect positive effect of generational diversity. However, shared leadership does not moderate the relationship between affective conflict and team innovation. These results offer a more nuanced understanding of the dual role of generational diversity in team innovation and underscore the importance of shared leadership in harnessing its potential benefits.

摘要

现代团队中代际多样性的不断增加引发了一场关于其对团队绩效影响的持续辩论。基于决策和社会认同理论,本研究探讨了代际多样性与团队创新绩效之间的多方面关系,考察了认知冲突和情感冲突的中介作用以及共享领导的调节作用。对中国一家组织中的五个多代际团队进行的三波调查结果显示,代际多样性既预测认知冲突也预测情感冲突,而这两种冲突随后对团队创新产生相反影响。共享领导正向调节认知冲突与团队创新之间的关系,放大了代际多样性的间接积极影响。然而,共享领导并未调节情感冲突与团队创新之间的关系。这些结果为代际多样性在团队创新中的双重作用提供了更细致入微的理解,并强调了共享领导在发挥其潜在益处方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Generational diversity and team innovation: the roles of conflict and shared leadership.代际多样性与团队创新:冲突和共享领导力的作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1501633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1501633. eCollection 2024.
2
What hinders team innovation performance? Three-way interaction of destructive leadership, intra-team conflict, and organizational diversity.是什么阻碍了团队创新绩效?破坏性领导、团队内部冲突和组织多样性的三方互动。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:879412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879412. eCollection 2022.
3
The chain mediating effect of shared leadership on team innovation.共享领导力对团队创新的链式中介效应。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 25;10(3):e25282. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25282. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
4
The relationship between servant leadership and team innovation performance: Mediating effect of self-efficacy.仆人式领导与团队创新绩效的关系:自我效能感的中介作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 12;10(6):e27723. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27723. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
5
Subgroup Formation in Diverse Virtual Teams: The Moderating Role of Identity Leadership.多元虚拟团队中的子群体形成:身份领导的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 21;12:722650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722650. eCollection 2021.
6
Shared leadership and team creativity: Examining effects of shared leadership level and concentration and the countervailing mechanisms.共享领导力与团队创造力:探究共享领导力水平、集中度的影响及抵消机制。
J Appl Psychol. 2025 Jul;110(7):1001-1014. doi: 10.1037/apl0001258. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
7
Humble Leadership and Team Innovation: The Mediating Role of Team Reflexivity and the Moderating Role of Expertise Diversity in Teams.谦逊型领导与团队创新:团队反思性的中介作用以及团队中专业知识多样性的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 18;13:726708. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.726708. eCollection 2022.
8
Promoting Innovative Performance in Multidisciplinary Teams: The Roles of Paradoxical Leadership and Team Perspective Taking.促进多学科团队中的创新绩效:矛盾式领导与团队换位思考的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 2;9:1083. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01083. eCollection 2018.
9
A moderated mediation model linking transactive memory system and social media with shared leadership and team innovation.中介调节模型将记忆系统和社交媒体与共享领导和团队创新联系起来。
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Aug;62(4):625-637. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12733. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
The ABC of health care team dynamics: understanding complex affective, behavioral, and cognitive dynamics in interprofessional teams.医疗团队动态的 ABC:理解跨专业团队中复杂的情感、行为和认知动态。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2014 Jan-Mar;39(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3182766504.

本文引用的文献

1
Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A retrospective of research on multicultural work groups and an agenda for future research.剖析团队中文化多样性的影响:多元文化工作群体研究回顾与未来研究议程
J Int Bus Stud. 2021;52(1):4-22. doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00389-9. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
Generational Diversity in the Workplace: Psychological Empowerment and Flexibility in Spanish Companies.职场中的代际多样性:西班牙公司中的心理授权与灵活性
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 23;10:1953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01953. eCollection 2019.
3
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness.
共享领导与团队效能的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):181-98. doi: 10.1037/a0034531. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
4
Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: toward a process-state perspective.超越关系冲突和任务冲突:走向过程-状态视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jul;98(4):559-78. doi: 10.1037/a0032896. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
5
Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.领导虚拟团队:层级领导、结构支持和共享团队领导。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 May;99(3):390-403. doi: 10.1037/a0030264. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
6
[Studies on HIV-1 strains in Henan province].[河南省HIV-1毒株的研究]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Mar;30(3):231-4.
7
The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: a close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes.冲突解决在团队中的关键作用:深入探讨冲突类型、冲突管理策略与团队成果之间的联系。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):170-88. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170.
8
The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity.体验到的创造性时间压力与创造力之间的曲线关系:经验开放性和对创造力支持的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):963-70. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963.
9
Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.工作团队多样性与团队绩效:一个整合模型及研究议程。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(6):1008-22. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008.
10
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.