Hong Daniel Zhihao, Lim Annabelle Jia Sing, Tan Rei, Ong Yun Ting, Pisupati Anushka, Chong Eleanor Jia Xin, Quek Chrystie Wan Ning, Lim Jia Yin, Ting Jacquelin Jia Qi, Chiam Min, Chin Annelissa Mien Chew, Lee Alexia Sze Inn, Wijaya Limin, Cook Sandy, Krishna Lalit Kumar Radha
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 Mar 24;8:23821205211000356. doi: 10.1177/23821205211000356. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Heralded as a teaching, assessment and reflective tool, and increasingly as a longitudinal and holistic perspective of the educator's development, medical educator's portfolios (MEP)s are increasingly employed to evaluate progress, assess for promotions and career switches, used as a reflective tool and as a means of curating educational activities. However, despite its blossoming role, there is significant dissonance in the content and structure of MEPs. As such, a systematic scoping review (SSR) is proposed to identify what is known of MEPs and its contents.
Krishna's Systematic Evidenced Based Approach (SEBA) was adopted to structure this SSR in SEBA of MEPs. SEBA's constructivist approach and relativist lens allow data from a variety of sources to be considered to paint a holistic picture of available information on MEPs.
From the 12 360 abstracts reviewed, 768 full text articles were evaluated, and 79 articles were included. Concurrent thematic and content analysis revealed similar themes and categories including: (1) , (2) , (3) and (4) .
This SSR in SEBA proffers a novel 5-staged evidence-based approach to constructing MEPs which allows for consistent application and assessment of MEPs. This 5-stage approach pivots on assessing and verifying the achievement of developmental milestones or 'micro-competencies' that facilitate micro-credentialling and effective evaluation of a medical educator's development and entrust-ability. This allows MEPs to be used as a reflective and collaborative tool and a basis for career planning.
医学教育工作者档案袋(MEP)被誉为一种教学、评估和反思工具,并且越来越多地用于从纵向和整体角度看待教育工作者的发展,越来越多地被用于评估进展、评估晋升和职业转换,用作反思工具以及整理教育活动的一种方式。然而,尽管其作用日益凸显,但MEP的内容和结构仍存在重大差异。因此,提议进行一项系统的范围综述(SSR),以确定关于MEP及其内容的已知情况。
采用克里希纳基于证据的系统方法(SEBA)来构建关于MEP的SEBA中的这项SSR。SEBA的建构主义方法和相对主义视角允许考虑来自各种来源的数据,以全面呈现关于MEP的现有信息。
在审查的12360篇摘要中,评估了768篇全文文章,纳入了79篇文章。同步进行的主题和内容分析揭示了相似的主题和类别,包括:(1) ,(2) ,(3) 和(4) 。
SEBA中的这项SSR提出了一种新颖的基于证据的五阶段方法来构建MEP,这允许对MEP进行一致的应用和评估。这种五阶段方法的关键在于评估和验证促进微观认证以及有效评估医学教育工作者的发展和可托付性的发展里程碑或“微能力”的实现情况。这使得MEP能够用作反思和协作工具以及职业规划的基础。