• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

链球菌性髋膝关节人工关节感染的清创、抗生素治疗及保留植入物的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Outcome of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for streptococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gerritsen Laura M, Scheper Henk, de Boer Mark G J, Schoones Jan W, Nelissen Rob G H H, Pijls Bart G C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, J-11-R-83, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Jul 16;14:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100201. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100201
PMID:39845860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11750026/
Abstract

PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the outcome of streptococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) and to evaluate risk factors associated with failure.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from inception until October 2021. Random effects meta-analyses (i.e. relative risk) were used to estimate the success rate at the study level and its association with possible risk factors for failure with a specific focus on the use of rifampicin.

RESULTS

25 observational studies were included, incorporating 1367 patients with streptococcal PJIs treated with DAIR. An overall pooled success rate of 71% (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 64-77%) was found for streptococcal PJI treated with DAIR. Treatment success was 76% (95%CI 62% to 91%) for knee PJI and 58% (95%CI 52% to 65%) for hip PJI. Treatment success differed for patients receiving rifampicin (84%, 95% CI 78% to 90%) compared to patients not receiving rifampicin (74%, 95% CI 63% to 85%), but this effect was no longer present in subsequent meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis showed no clear benefit for rifampicin administration after DAIR for streptococcal PJI. Better outcome was observed for knee PJI compared to hip PJI.

摘要

PROSPERO注册号:367411。

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估清创、抗生素及保留植入物(DAIR)治疗链球菌性髋和膝关节假体周围感染(PJI)的疗效,并评估与治疗失败相关的危险因素。

方法

我们在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行了一项系统文献检索,检索时间从建库至2021年10月。采用随机效应荟萃分析(即相对风险)来估计研究水平的成功率及其与可能的失败危险因素的关联,特别关注利福平的使用情况。

结果

纳入了25项观察性研究,共1367例接受DAIR治疗的链球菌性PJI患者。DAIR治疗链球菌性PJI的总体合并成功率为71%(95%置信区间(95%CI)64 - 77%)。膝关节PJI的治疗成功率为76%(95%CI 62%至91%),髋关节PJI为58%(95%CI 52%至65%)。接受利福平治疗的患者治疗成功率为84%(95%CI 78%至90%),未接受利福平治疗的患者为74%(95%CI 63%至8

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f2/11750026/82f9f602f8f6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f2/11750026/50c3b621f2df/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f2/11750026/82f9f602f8f6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f2/11750026/50c3b621f2df/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f2/11750026/82f9f602f8f6/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcome of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for streptococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.链球菌性髋膝关节人工关节感染的清创、抗生素治疗及保留植入物的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Jul 16;14:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100201. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Modular component exchange and outcome of DAIR for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection : a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.髋关节和膝关节假体周围感染清创、抗生素骨水泥间隔物植入术的模块化组件交换与结果:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Oct;2(10):806-812. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0090.R1.
3
Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Staphylococcal Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections, Focused on Rifampicin Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.清创、抗生素及保留植入物治疗金黄色葡萄球菌性髋膝关节假体周围感染的疗效,重点关注利福平的使用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 1;8(7):ofab298. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab298. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
The Role of Long-Term Antibiotic Suppression in the Management of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention: A Systematic Review.保留假体清创术联合抗生素治疗假体周围关节感染后长期抗生素抑制的作用:系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1154-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.026. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
5
Clinical outcomes of rifampicin combination therapy in implant-associated infections due to staphylococci and streptococci: A systematic review and meta-analysis.利福平联合治疗葡萄球菌和链球菌所致植入物相关感染的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Jan;63(1):107015. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.107015. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
6
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the early prosthetic joint infection of total knee and hip arthroplasties: a systematic review.清创术、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)治疗全膝关节和髋关节置换术后早期假体关节感染:系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2024 Feb;9(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
7
Success rate of single versus multiple debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单部位与多部位清创、灌洗及保留假体(DAIR)治疗髋膝关节假体周围感染的成功率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):3859-3872. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04091-6. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
8
Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for periprosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes.清创、抗生素和假体保留治疗人工关节周围感染:系统评价和荟萃分析的治疗结果。
J Infect. 2018 Dec;77(6):479-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
A Comparison of Outcomes of Culture positive and Culture negative Acute Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection following Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR).清创术、抗生素保留和假体保留(DAIR)治疗下培养阳性和培养阴性急性膝关节假体关节感染的结局比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2375-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03445-2. Epub 2022 Nov 27.
10
Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR): An effective treatment option for early prosthetic joint infections.清创术、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR):治疗早期人工关节感染的有效方法。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Aug;27(8):1162-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention after revision arthroplasty : antibiotic mismatch, timing, and repeated DAIR associated with poor outcome.翻修术后清创、抗生素和植入物保留:抗生素不匹配、时机和重复的 DAIR 与不良结局相关。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Apr;104-B(4):464-471. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-1264.R1.
2
Modular component exchange and outcome of DAIR for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection : a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.髋关节和膝关节假体周围感染清创、抗生素骨水泥间隔物植入术的模块化组件交换与结果:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Oct;2(10):806-812. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0090.R1.
3
Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Staphylococcal Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections, Focused on Rifampicin Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
清创、抗生素及保留植入物治疗金黄色葡萄球菌性髋膝关节假体周围感染的疗效,重点关注利福平的使用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 1;8(7):ofab298. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab298. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
One-year infection control rates of a DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) procedure after primary and prosthetic-joint-infection-related revision arthroplasty - a retrospective cohort study.初次及人工关节感染相关翻修置换术后DAIR(清创、抗生素及植入物保留)手术的一年感染控制率——一项回顾性队列研究
J Bone Jt Infect. 2021 Jan 27;6(4):91-97. doi: 10.5194/jbji-6-91-2021. eCollection 2021.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for periprosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes.清创、抗生素和假体保留治疗人工关节周围感染:系统评价和荟萃分析的治疗结果。
J Infect. 2018 Dec;77(6):479-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
7
High failure rates in treatment of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection: results from a seven-year retrospective cohort study.链球菌性人工关节感染治疗的高失败率:一项七年回顾性队列研究的结果
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):653-659. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0851.R1.
8
Outcome of patients with streptococcal prosthetic joint infections with special reference to rifampicin combinations.链球菌人工关节感染患者的治疗结果,特别提及利福平联合用药
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1889-0.
9
Evaluation of Quality of Lower Limb Arthroplasty Observational Studies Using the Assessment of Quality in Lower Limb Arthroplasty (AQUILA) Checklist.使用下肢关节置换术质量评估(AQUILA)检查表对下肢关节置换术观察性研究的质量进行评估。
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9):1513-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention.利奈唑胺联合或不联合利福平治疗清创保留假体治疗人工关节感染的临床经验回顾性研究
Infect Dis Ther. 2014 Dec;3(2):235-43. doi: 10.1007/s40121-014-0032-z. Epub 2014 Aug 20.