• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型足球重返赛场测试(RONDO测试)的内容效度

Content Validity of a New Soccer (Football) Return-to-Play Test: The RONDO-TEST.

作者信息

Matas Sergi, Lalín Carlos, Corbi Francisco, Planas-Anzano Antoni, Moya José M, Mas-Alòs Sebastià, Peirau-Terés Xavier

机构信息

Institut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Partida la Caparrella, 97, E-25192 Lleida, Spain.

Human Movement Research Group (GRMH), University of Lleida (UdL), [2021 SGR 01619], E-25002 Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 25;10(1):3. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010003.

DOI:10.3390/jfmk10010003
PMID:39846644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11755452/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to assess the content validity of a new field test on general and soccer-specific motor skills before return to play.

METHODS

The RONDO-TEST was assessed by a Delphi panel for its content validity. It included a survey to evaluate 16 items related to the test consisting of four 10 m lines which cross over at their mid-point, resulting in eight 5 m sectors that include locomotor skills (speeding, moving sideways, side cutting, and jumping) and soccer-specific technical skills (dribbling, slalom course, and kicking/passing). The content validity was calculated with the Aiken's V coefficient of acceptance at 0.69 and 95% of confidence interval.

RESULTS

Eight experts participated in the Delphi and agreed on the administration procedures after three rounds of suggestions. Major changes included the order of execution and the descriptions of the sectors. The results showed consensus (V = 1, maximum acceptance) for the clarity of instructions, the relevance of the skills to be evaluated, the order of execution, the materials and the relevance of measuring total and partial sector times.

CONCLUSIONS

The RONDO-TEST may be feasible and simple to administer and evaluate technical functional skills (actions) and condition-related abilities (e.g., the ability to repeat the test, fatigue curve, etc.), which are relevant aspects for return to play under optimum conditions.

摘要

目的

旨在评估一项新的关于重返赛场前一般和足球专项运动技能的现场测试的内容效度。

方法

通过德尔菲专家组对RONDO测试的内容效度进行评估。该测试包括一项调查,以评估与该测试相关的16个项目,测试由四条在中点交叉的10米线组成,形成八个5米扇形区域,其中包括移动技能(加速、侧向移动、侧切和跳跃)以及足球专项技术技能(运球、障碍跑和踢/传球)。内容效度采用艾肯V系数进行计算,接受系数为0.69,置信区间为95%。

结果

八位专家参与了德尔菲评估,并在经过三轮建议后就施测程序达成一致。主要变化包括执行顺序和扇形区域的描述。结果显示,在指导说明的清晰度、待评估技能的相关性、执行顺序、材料以及测量总扇形区域和部分扇形区域时间的相关性方面达成了共识(V = 1,最高接受度)。

结论

RONDO测试可能可行且易于实施和评估技术功能技能(动作)以及与状态相关的能力(例如,重复测试的能力、疲劳曲线等),这些都是在最佳条件下重返赛场的相关方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aad/11755452/d76ae7d96b14/jfmk-10-00003-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aad/11755452/1ccb421d10ad/jfmk-10-00003-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aad/11755452/d76ae7d96b14/jfmk-10-00003-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aad/11755452/1ccb421d10ad/jfmk-10-00003-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aad/11755452/d76ae7d96b14/jfmk-10-00003-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Content Validity of a New Soccer (Football) Return-to-Play Test: The RONDO-TEST.一种新型足球重返赛场测试(RONDO测试)的内容效度
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 25;10(1):3. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010003.
2
Return to play after hamstring injuries in football (soccer): a worldwide Delphi procedure regarding definition, medical criteria and decision-making.足球(英式足球)中腘绳肌损伤后的复出:一项针对定义、医学标准和决策制定的全球性德尔菲程序。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;51(22):1583-1591. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097206. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
3
Design and Validation of the Instrument for the Measurement of Learning and Performance in Football.足球学习与表现测量工具的设计与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 27;17(13):4629. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134629.
4
Return to Play in Long-Standing Adductor-Related Groin Pain: A Delphi Study Among Experts.长期内收肌相关腹股沟疼痛的重返运动:一项专家德尔菲研究
Sports Med Open. 2022 Jan 18;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00400-z.
5
Validity of an On-Field Readaptation Program Following a Hamstring Injury in Professional Soccer.职业足球运动员腘绳肌损伤后的场外康复方案的有效性。
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Aug 1;28(6). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0203.
6
Return to play criteria after hamstring muscle injury in professional football: a Delphi consensus study.职业足球运动员腘绳肌损伤后重返赛场的标准:德尔菲共识研究。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Aug;51(16):1221-1226. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097131. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
Impact of limited hamstring flexibility on vertical jump, kicking speed, sprint, and agility in young football players.腘绳肌灵活性受限对年轻足球运动员垂直跳跃、踢腿速度、短跑和敏捷性的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(12):1293-7. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1022577. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
Exercise-Based Strategies to Prevent Muscle Injury in Male Elite Footballers: An Expert-Led Delphi Survey of 21 Practitioners Belonging to 18 Teams from the Big-5 European Leagues.基于运动的预防男性精英足球运动员肌肉损伤策略:来自大五欧洲联赛 18 支球队的 21 名从业者参与的专家领衔德尔菲调查。
Sports Med. 2020 Sep;50(9):1667-1681. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01315-7.
9
Design, Validation, and Reliability of an Observation Instrument for Technical and Tactical Actions of the Offense Phase in Soccer.足球进攻阶段技术和战术动作观察工具的设计、验证与可靠性
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 24;10:22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00022. eCollection 2019.
10
Development of body composition, hormone profile, physical fitness, general perceptual motor skills, soccer skills and on-the-ball performance in soccer-specific laboratory test among adolescent soccer players.青少年足球运动员身体成分、激素水平、身体素质、一般运动知觉技能、足球技能和球上表现的发展在足球专项实验室测试中。
J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Dec 1;9(4):547-56. eCollection 2010.

本文引用的文献

1
Intra and Inter-Test Reliability of Isometric Hip Adduction Strength Test with Force Plates in Professional Soccer Players.职业足球运动员中使用测力板进行等长髋关节内收力量测试的测试内及测试间信度
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 12;9(4):270. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040270.
2
Ecological and Specific Evidence-Based Safe Return To Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction In Soccer Players: A New International Paradigm.足球运动员前交叉韧带重建术后基于生态和特定证据的安全重返赛场:一种新的国际范式
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Apr 2;18(2):526-540. doi: 10.26603/001c.73031. eCollection 2023.
3
Unilateral tests of lower-limb function as prognostic indicators of future knee-related outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 150 adolescents and adults.
前交叉韧带损伤后下肢功能单侧测试作为未来膝关节相关预后指标的系统评价和对13150名青少年及成年人的荟萃分析
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;57(13):855-863. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105736. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
4
Validity of a Rehab and Reconditioning Program Following an Adductor Longus Injury in Professional Soccer.职业足球运动员内收肌长肌损伤康复再训练方案的有效性。
J Sport Rehabil. 2021 Apr 9;30(8):1224-1229. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2020-0360.
5
Validity of an On-Field Readaptation Program Following a Hamstring Injury in Professional Soccer.职业足球运动员腘绳肌损伤后的场外康复方案的有效性。
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Aug 1;28(6). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0203.
6
Development of Foundational Movement Skills: A Conceptual Model for Physical Activity Across the Lifespan.基础运动技能的发展:贯穿生命全程身体活动的概念模型。
Sports Med. 2018 Jul;48(7):1533-1540. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0892-6.
7
High Speed Running and Sprinting Profiles of Elite Soccer Players.精英足球运动员的高速奔跑和短跑概况
J Hum Kinet. 2017 Aug 1;58:169-176. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0086. eCollection 2017 Sep.
8
The relationship between movement speed and duration during soccer matches.足球比赛中移动速度与持续时间之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 25;12(7):e0181781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181781. eCollection 2017.
9
Effects of a Prophylactic Knee Sleeve on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Loading During Sport-Specific Movements.预防性护膝对特定运动动作中前交叉韧带负荷的影响。
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):1-7. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0079.
10
Criteria for Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction with lower reinjury risk (CR'STAL study): protocol for a prospective observational study in France.前交叉韧带重建术后低再损伤风险下恢复运动的标准(CR'STAL研究):法国一项前瞻性观察性研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e015087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015087.