• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢克洛与阿莫西林在一家慢性病医院治疗泌尿系统感染中的比较。

Comparison of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of urinary infections in a chronic disease hospital.

作者信息

Lindan R

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:67-9.

PMID:398483
Abstract

The clinical efficacy and safety of cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin, was compared with that of amoxycillin in the treatment of lower urinary tract infections in 61 patients with chronic non-urinary tract disease. Thirty-six patients received cefaclor and 25 received amoxycillin doses of 250 mg every 8 hours for 7 to 10 days. The therapeutic effectiveness of cefaclor was significantly better than that of amoxycillin, and it appeared to be well tolerated and free of adverse side effects. It produced no allergic reactions in 4 patients with a history of penicillin allergy and was effective against Klebsiella strains resistant to the ampicillins. There was no evidence of any haematological, renal or hepatic toxicity from either drug at the dosage used.

摘要

将一种新型口服头孢菌素头孢克洛与阿莫西林的临床疗效及安全性进行了比较,以治疗61例患有慢性非泌尿系统疾病的下尿路感染患者。36例患者接受头孢克洛治疗,25例患者接受阿莫西林治疗,均每8小时服用250毫克,持续7至10天。头孢克洛的治疗效果明显优于阿莫西林,且似乎耐受性良好,无不良副作用。在4例有青霉素过敏史的患者中未产生过敏反应,并且对耐氨苄青霉素的克雷伯菌菌株有效。在所使用的剂量下,两种药物均未显示出任何血液学、肾脏或肝脏毒性的证据。

相似文献

1
Comparison of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of urinary infections in a chronic disease hospital.头孢克洛与阿莫西林在一家慢性病医院治疗泌尿系统感染中的比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:67-9.
2
Influence of amoxycillin and cefaclor on the colonization resistance of oropharynx.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1983;39:97-9.
3
Cefaclor: clinical and bacteriological evaluation in 45 cases.头孢克洛:45例临床及细菌学评估
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:70-1.
4
A double-blind study comparing cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice.一项在普通医疗中比较头孢克洛和阿莫西林治疗呼吸道感染的双盲研究。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1980;2(7):494-8.
5
[Comparative study of cefaclor and amoxicillin in the treatment of urinary infections].
Acta Urol Belg. 1981 Oct;49(4):447-51.
6
Oral cefaclor for treatment of bronchitis--a comparative double-blind study versus amoxycillin.口服头孢克洛治疗支气管炎——与阿莫西林的双盲对照研究
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1982 Mar;20(3):113-7.
7
Therapy with cefaclor: analysis of infections in 189 French patients.头孢克洛治疗:189例法国患者感染情况分析。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:72-6.
8
Cefaclor--summary of clinical experience.头孢克洛——临床经验总结。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:93-9.
9
A double-blind study of cefaclor and amoxycillin in home and hospital-acquired infections.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1982;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.1185/03007998209109748.
10
Evaluation of cefaclor.头孢克洛的评估。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1981 Jan;38(1):54-8.