• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Influence of amoxycillin and cefaclor on the colonization resistance of oropharynx.

作者信息

van Saene H K, Willems F T, Zweens J

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1983;39:97-9.

PMID:6359384
Abstract

A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was carried out to compare amoxycillin and cefaclor in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice. Their effect on the microflora of the oropharynx, their clinical effectiveness, side-effects and the incidence of superinfections were monitored. Amoxycillin and cefaclor were given three times daily in a dosage of 375 and 250 mg, respectively, for 7 days. In 72 patients treated with amoxycillin, the oropharynx became colonized with resistant Gram-negative rods in 24, with Pseudomonas in 1, with Staphylococcus aureus in 3 and with yeasts in 2 patients. In 67 patients treated with cefaclor only 2 patients became colonized with Gram-negative rods. In the amoxycillin group, 5 superinfections developed within 4 weeks after treatment. No superinfection occurred after treatment with cefaclor. Clinically, cefaclor was more effective than amoxycillin and showed fewer side-effects.

摘要

相似文献

1
Influence of amoxycillin and cefaclor on the colonization resistance of oropharynx.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1983;39:97-9.
2
A double-blind study comparing cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice.一项在普通医疗中比较头孢克洛和阿莫西林治疗呼吸道感染的双盲研究。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1980;2(7):494-8.
3
Swedish Study Group. A randomized multicenter trial to compare the influence of cefaclor and amoxycillin on the colonization resistance of the digestive tract in patients with lower respiratory tract infection.
Infection. 1991 Jul-Aug;19(4):208-15. doi: 10.1007/BF01644947.
4
Evaluation of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗急性中耳炎的疗效评估。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:39-41.
5
Comparison of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of urinary infections in a chronic disease hospital.头孢克洛与阿莫西林在一家慢性病医院治疗泌尿系统感染中的比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:67-9.
6
Cefaclor compared with amoxycillin acute otitis media with effusion: a preliminary report.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗渗出性急性中耳炎的比较:初步报告。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:42-9.
7
Oral cefaclor for treatment of bronchitis--a comparative double-blind study versus amoxycillin.口服头孢克洛治疗支气管炎——与阿莫西林的双盲对照研究
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1982 Mar;20(3):113-7.
8
A double-blind comparison of the effects of cefaclor and amoxycillin on respiratory tract and oropharyngeal flora and clinical response in acute exacerbations of bronchitis.头孢克洛与阿莫西林对支气管炎急性加重期呼吸道及口咽菌群影响和临床反应的双盲比较
Respir Med. 1991 Jul;85(4):301-8. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(06)80101-0.
9
Comparative study of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗全科医疗中呼吸道感染的对比研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1980;6(8):569-72. doi: 10.1185/03007998009109489.
10
A double-blind study of cefaclor and amoxycillin in home and hospital-acquired infections.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1982;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.1185/03007998209109748.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic significance of wound infections following major head and neck cancer surgery: an open non-comparative prospective study.
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Sep;12(9):634-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0600-y.
2
Swedish Study Group. A randomized multicenter trial to compare the influence of cefaclor and amoxycillin on the colonization resistance of the digestive tract in patients with lower respiratory tract infection.
Infection. 1991 Jul-Aug;19(4):208-15. doi: 10.1007/BF01644947.