• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A double-blind study of cefaclor and amoxycillin in home and hospital-acquired infections.

作者信息

Harrower A D

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1982;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.1185/03007998209109748.

DOI:10.1185/03007998209109748
PMID:7105818
Abstract

Eighty-seven patients admitted to hospital for a variety of reasons and who had, or subsequently developed, an infection were treated with either cefaclor or amoxycillin, 150 mg 3-times daily, on a double-blind basis. Two patients were excluded from te final analysis as the infecting organisms would normally be resistant to both antibiotics. Forty (93%) patients treated with cefaclor and 40 (95.2%) treated with amoxycillin responded satisfactorily. Of the patients with a hospital-acquired infection, 93.3% of the cefaclor group and 94.3% of the amoxycillin group responded satisfactorily. The differences between the groups were not significant. A greater number of organisms were sensitive to cefaclor, confirming its broader spectrum of activity. It is concluded that cefaclor is a useful first-line antibiotic which could be particularly useful in hospital-acquired infections.

摘要

相似文献

1
A double-blind study of cefaclor and amoxycillin in home and hospital-acquired infections.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1982;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.1185/03007998209109748.
2
A double-blind study comparing cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice.一项在普通医疗中比较头孢克洛和阿莫西林治疗呼吸道感染的双盲研究。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1980;2(7):494-8.
3
Influence of amoxycillin and cefaclor on the colonization resistance of oropharynx.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1983;39:97-9.
4
Comparative study of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗全科医疗中呼吸道感染的对比研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1980;6(8):569-72. doi: 10.1185/03007998009109489.
5
Comparison of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of urinary infections in a chronic disease hospital.头孢克洛与阿莫西林在一家慢性病医院治疗泌尿系统感染中的比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:67-9.
6
Swedish Study Group. A randomized multicenter trial to compare the influence of cefaclor and amoxycillin on the colonization resistance of the digestive tract in patients with lower respiratory tract infection.
Infection. 1991 Jul-Aug;19(4):208-15. doi: 10.1007/BF01644947.
7
Oral cefaclor for treatment of bronchitis--a comparative double-blind study versus amoxycillin.口服头孢克洛治疗支气管炎——与阿莫西林的双盲对照研究
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1982 Mar;20(3):113-7.
8
Evaluation of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗急性中耳炎的疗效评估。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:39-41.
9
Cefaclor versus amoxicillin in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia: a comparative double-blind study.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗细菌性肺炎的比较:一项双盲对照研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Feb;2(1):11-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02019916.
10
Cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗慢性支气管炎感染性加重
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jan;11(1):83-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/11.1.83.