• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能聊天机器人与认知控制:通过聊天机器人交互增强执行功能:一项系统综述。

AI Chatbots and Cognitive Control: Enhancing Executive Functions Through Chatbot Interactions: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Pergantis Pantelis, Bamicha Victoria, Skianis Charalampos, Drigas Athanasios

机构信息

Net Media Lab & Mind & Brain R&D, Institute of Informatics & Telecommunications, National Centre of Scientific Research 'Demokritos', 153 41 Agia Paraskevi, Greece.

Department of Information & Communication Systems Engineering, University of the Aegean, 832 00 Karlovasi, Greece.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):47. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010047.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci15010047
PMID:39851415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11764365/
Abstract

: The evolution of digital technology enhances the broadening of a person's intellectual growth. Research points out that implementing innovative applications of the digital world improves human social, cognitive, and metacognitive behavior. Artificial intelligence chatbots are yet another innovative human-made construct. These are forms of software that simulate human conversation, understand and process user input, and provide personalized responses. Executive function includes a set of higher mental processes necessary for formulating, planning, and achieving a goal. The present study aims to investigate executive function reinforcement through artificial intelligence chatbots, outlining potentials, limitations, and future research suggestions. Specifically, the study examined three research questions: the use of conversational chatbots in executive functioning training, their impact on executive-cognitive skills, and the duration of any improvements. : The assessment of the existing literature was implemented using the systematic review method, according to the PRISMA 2020 Principles. The avalanche search method was employed to conduct a source search in the following databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and complementary Google Scholar. This systematic review included studies from 2021 to the present using experimental, observational, or mixed methods. It included studies using AI-based chatbots or conversationalists to support executive functions, such as anxiety, stress, depression, memory, attention, cognitive load, and behavioral changes. In addition, this study included general populations with specific neurological conditions, all peer-reviewed, written in English, and with full-text access. However, the study excluded studies before 2021, the literature reviews, systematic reviews, non-AI-based chatbots or conversationalists, studies not targeting the range of executive skills and abilities, studies not written in English, and studies without open access. The criteria aligned with the study objectives, ensuring a focus on AI chatbots and the impact of conversational agents on executive function. The initial collection totaled = 115 articles; however, the eligibility requirements led to the final selection of = 10 studies. : The findings of the studies suggested positive effects of using AI chatbots to enhance and improve executive skills. Although, several limitations were identified, making it still difficult to generalize and reproduce their effects. : AI chatbots are an innovative artificial intelligence tool that can function as a digital assistant for learning and expanding executive skills, contributing to the cognitive, metacognitive, and social development of the individual. However, its use in executive skills training is at a primary stage. The findings highlighted the need for a unified framework for reference and future studies, better study designs, diverse populations, larger sample sizes of participants, and longitudinal studies that observe the long-term effects of their use.

摘要

数字技术的发展促进了个人智力成长的拓展。研究指出,实施数字世界的创新应用可改善人类的社交、认知和元认知行为。人工智能聊天机器人是另一种创新的人造工具。它们是模拟人类对话、理解和处理用户输入并提供个性化回复的软件形式。执行功能包括一系列制定、规划和实现目标所需的高级心理过程。本研究旨在探讨通过人工智能聊天机器人强化执行功能,概述其潜力、局限性及未来研究建议。具体而言,该研究考察了三个研究问题:对话式聊天机器人在执行功能训练中的应用、它们对执行认知技能的影响以及任何改善的持续时间。

根据PRISMA 2020原则,采用系统评价方法对现有文献进行评估。采用雪崩搜索法在以下数据库中进行文献检索:Scopus、科学网、PubMed以及补充性的谷歌学术。该系统评价纳入了2021年至今采用实验、观察或混合方法的研究。它包括使用基于人工智能的聊天机器人或对话者来支持执行功能的研究,如焦虑、压力、抑郁、记忆、注意力、认知负荷和行为变化。此外,本研究纳入了有特定神经状况的普通人群,所有研究均经过同行评审、用英文撰写且可获取全文。然而,该研究排除了2021年之前的研究、文献综述、系统评价、非基于人工智能的聊天机器人或对话者、未针对执行技能和能力范围的研究、非英文撰写的研究以及无开放获取的研究。这些标准与研究目标一致,确保专注于人工智能聊天机器人以及对话代理对执行功能的影响。初步收集到115篇文章;然而,根据纳入标准最终选定了10项研究。

研究结果表明,使用人工智能聊天机器人增强和改善执行技能具有积极效果。尽管如此,也发现了一些局限性,这使得仍然难以对其效果进行推广和复制。

人工智能聊天机器人是一种创新的人工智能工具,可作为学习和扩展执行技能的数字助手,有助于个体的认知、元认知和社会发展。然而,其在执行技能训练中的应用尚处于初级阶段。研究结果强调需要一个统一的框架以供参考和未来研究,需要更好的研究设计、多样化的人群、更大规模的参与者样本以及观察其使用长期效果的纵向研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/57545d0f7709/brainsci-15-00047-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/36dc8775ba02/brainsci-15-00047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/ddb13330fd43/brainsci-15-00047-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/2e64d4a2d926/brainsci-15-00047-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/bc6cbc08fabb/brainsci-15-00047-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/f7cb4a512bc8/brainsci-15-00047-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/57545d0f7709/brainsci-15-00047-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/36dc8775ba02/brainsci-15-00047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/ddb13330fd43/brainsci-15-00047-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/2e64d4a2d926/brainsci-15-00047-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/bc6cbc08fabb/brainsci-15-00047-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/f7cb4a512bc8/brainsci-15-00047-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8789/11764365/57545d0f7709/brainsci-15-00047-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
AI Chatbots and Cognitive Control: Enhancing Executive Functions Through Chatbot Interactions: A Systematic Review.人工智能聊天机器人与认知控制:通过聊天机器人交互增强执行功能:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):47. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010047.
2
The Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Conversational Agents (Chatbots) for Weight Loss: Scoping Review and Practical Recommendations.基于人工智能的对话代理(聊天机器人)在减肥中的应用:范围综述与实用建议。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e32578. doi: 10.2196/32578.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Artificial Intelligence-Based Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions: Systematic Literature Review.基于人工智能的慢性病对话代理:系统文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 14;22(9):e20701. doi: 10.2196/20701.
5
The Impact of Generative Conversational Artificial Intelligence on the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Community: Scoping Review.生成式对话人工智能对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿群体的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 6;25:e52091. doi: 10.2196/52091.
6
The Efficacy of Conversational AI in Rectifying the Theory-of-Mind and Autonomy Biases: Comparative Analysis.对话式人工智能纠正心理理论和自主性偏差的功效:比较分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 7;12:e64396. doi: 10.2196/64396.
7
Transforming Health Care Through Chatbots for Medical History-Taking and Future Directions: Comprehensive Systematic Review.通过聊天机器人进行病史采集实现医疗保健变革及未来方向:全面系统综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Aug 29;12:e56628. doi: 10.2196/56628.
8
Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review.基于人工智能的聊天机器人促进健康行为改变:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 24;25:e40789. doi: 10.2196/40789.
9
Conversational AI and Vaccine Communication: Systematic Review of the Evidence.会话式人工智能与疫苗传播:证据的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 3;25:e42758. doi: 10.2196/42758.
10
A systematic review of artificial intelligence-powered (AI-powered) chatbot intervention for managing chronic illness.人工智能驱动的(AI 驱动)聊天机器人干预管理慢性疾病的系统评价。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2302980. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2302980. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational Neuroscience's Influence on Autism Neuro-Transmission Research: Mapping Serotonin, Dopamine, GABA, and Glutamate.计算神经科学对自闭症神经传递研究的影响:绘制血清素、多巴胺、γ-氨基丁酸和谷氨酸的图谱。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 10;13(6):1420. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061420.
2
Smart Digital Solutions for EARLY Treatment of COGNitive Disability (EARLY-COGN^3): A Study Protocol.用于认知障碍早期治疗的智能数字解决方案(EARLY-COGN^3):一项研究方案
Brain Sci. 2025 Feb 24;15(3):239. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030239.
3
Non-Invasive BCI-VR Applied Protocols as Intervention Paradigms on School-Aged Subjects with ASD: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Adolescents' use and perceived usefulness of generative AI for schoolwork: exploring their relationships with executive functioning and academic achievement.青少年在学业中对生成式人工智能的使用及感知有用性:探究其与执行功能和学业成绩的关系。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Aug 28;7:1415782. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1415782. eCollection 2024.
2
Reference Hallucination Score for Medical Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: Development and Usability Study.医学人工智能聊天机器人的参考幻觉评分:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jul 31;12:e54345. doi: 10.2196/54345.
3
Digitally Assisted Mindfulness in Training Self-Regulation Skills for Sustainable Mental Health: A Systematic Review.
非侵入性脑机接口虚拟现实应用协议作为对患有自闭症谱系障碍学龄受试者的干预范式:一项系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 22;25(5):1342. doi: 10.3390/s25051342.
数字辅助正念训练自我调节技能以促进可持续心理健康:一项系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 10;13(12):1008. doi: 10.3390/bs13121008.
4
Artificial intelligence technology in Alzheimer's disease research.人工智能技术在阿尔茨海默病研究中的应用
Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2023 Nov;12(4):208-212. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2023.01091.
5
Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task.在创造性发散思维任务中,最优秀的人类仍然胜过人工智能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 14;13(1):13601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40858-3.
6
ChatGPT: these are not hallucinations - they're fabrications and falsifications.ChatGPT:这些不是幻觉——它们是编造和伪造。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Aug 19;9(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00379-4.
7
Potential effectiveness of digital therapeutics specialized in executive functions as adjunctive treatment for clinical symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a feasibility study.专注于执行功能的数字疗法作为注意缺陷多动障碍临床症状辅助治疗的潜在有效性:一项可行性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 20;14:1169030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1169030. eCollection 2023.
8
To chat or bot to chat: Ethical issues with using chatbots in mental health.聊天还是由聊天机器人来聊天:心理健康领域使用聊天机器人的伦理问题。
Digit Health. 2023 Jun 22;9:20552076231183542. doi: 10.1177/20552076231183542. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
An Overview of Chatbot-Based Mobile Mental Health Apps: Insights From App Description and User Reviews.基于聊天机器人的移动心理健康应用概述:来自应用描述和用户评论的见解。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 May 22;11:e44838. doi: 10.2196/44838.
10
Perceived satisfaction of university students with the use of chatbots as a tool for self-regulated learning.大学生对使用聊天机器人作为自主学习工具的满意度认知。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 13;9(1):e12843. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12843. eCollection 2023 Jan.