• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中风评分:个性化急性缺血性中风治疗以改善患者预后。

Stroke-SCORE: Personalizing Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment to Improve Patient Outcomes.

作者信息

Seetge Jessica, Cséke Balázs, Karádi Zsófia Nozomi, Bosnyák Edit, Szapáry László

机构信息

Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2025 Jan 4;15(1):18. doi: 10.3390/jpm15010018.

DOI:10.3390/jpm15010018
PMID:39852210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11766924/
Abstract

: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Despite advances in interventions such as thrombolysis (TL) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT), current treatment protocols remain largely standardized, focusing on general eligibility rather than individual patient characteristics. To address this gap, we introduce the Stroke-SCORE (Simplified Clinical Outcome Risk Evaluation), a predictive tool designed to personalize AIS management by providing data-driven, individualized recommendations to optimize treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes. The Stroke-SCORE was derived using retrospective data from 793 AIS patients admitted to the University of Pécs (February 2023-September 2024). Logistic regression analysis identified age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission, and pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale (pre-mRS) score as key predictors of unfavorable outcomes at 90 days (defined as modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 2). Based on these predictors, a simplified risk score was developed to stratify patients into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, guiding treatment decisions on TL, MT, combination therapy (TL + MT), or standard care (SC). Internal validation was performed to assess the model's predictive performance via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and isotonic regression calibration with bootstrapping. The Stroke-SCORE was moderately positively correlated with a 90-day mRS score > 2 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.83, < 0.001), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86, a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 81%, respectively, and an overall accuracy of 80%. Simulations indicated that personalized treatment guided by the Stroke-SCORE significantly reduced unfavorable outcomes. The Stroke-SCORE demonstrates strong predictive performance as a practical, data-driven approach for personalizing AIS treatment decisions. In the future, external, multicenter prospective validation is needed to confirm its applicability in real-world settings.

摘要

急性缺血性卒中(AIS)是全球致残和致死的主要原因。尽管在溶栓(TL)和机械取栓(MT)等干预措施方面取得了进展,但目前的治疗方案在很大程度上仍保持标准化,侧重于一般的入选标准而非个体患者特征。为了弥补这一差距,我们引入了卒中评分(Stroke - SCORE,简化临床结局风险评估),这是一种预测工具,旨在通过提供数据驱动的个性化建议来优化治疗策略并改善患者结局,从而实现AIS管理的个性化。卒中评分(Stroke - SCORE)是使用来自佩奇大学(2023年2月至2024年9月)收治的793例AIS患者的回顾性数据得出的。逻辑回归分析确定年龄、入院时的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分以及病前改良Rankin量表(pre - mRS)评分是90天时不良结局(定义为改良Rankin量表[mRS]评分>2)的关键预测因素。基于这些预测因素,开发了一个简化的风险评分,将患者分为低、中、高风险组,以指导关于TL、MT、联合治疗(TL + MT)或标准治疗(SC)的治疗决策。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)分析和带有自抽样法的等渗回归校准进行内部验证,以评估模型的预测性能。卒中评分(Stroke - SCORE)与90天时mRS评分>2呈中度正相关(比值比[OR]=0.70,95%置信区间[CI]:0.58 - 0.83,<0.001),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.86,敏感性和特异性分别为79%和81%,总体准确率为80%。模拟表明,由卒中评分(Stroke - SCORE)指导的个性化治疗显著降低了不良结局。卒中评分(Stroke - SCORE)作为一种实用的、数据驱动的方法,在个性化AIS治疗决策方面表现出强大的预测性能。未来,需要进行外部多中心前瞻性验证,以确认其在现实环境中的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/5dd4a6790b20/jpm-15-00018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/40283297a7aa/jpm-15-00018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/6d14aa0c2526/jpm-15-00018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/90f6e4468f5f/jpm-15-00018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/694442cf742f/jpm-15-00018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/69ace3ba7101/jpm-15-00018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/5dd4a6790b20/jpm-15-00018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/40283297a7aa/jpm-15-00018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/6d14aa0c2526/jpm-15-00018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/90f6e4468f5f/jpm-15-00018-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/694442cf742f/jpm-15-00018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/69ace3ba7101/jpm-15-00018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5899/11766924/5dd4a6790b20/jpm-15-00018-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Stroke-SCORE: Personalizing Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment to Improve Patient Outcomes.中风评分:个性化急性缺血性中风治疗以改善患者预后。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jan 4;15(1):18. doi: 10.3390/jpm15010018.
2
Pretreatment predictors of very poor clinical outcomes in medium vessel occlusion stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy.接受机械取栓治疗的中等直径血管闭塞性卒中患者,其临床预后极差的预测因素。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Dec;19(10):1123-1133. doi: 10.1177/17474930241270524. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
A novel nomogram based on the patient's clinical data and CT signs to predict poor outcomes in AIS patients.一种基于患者临床数据和CT征象的新型列线图,用于预测急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的不良预后。
PeerJ. 2025 Jan 6;13:e18662. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18662. eCollection 2025.
4
A NAC nomogram to predict the probability of three-month unfavorable outcome in Chinese acute ischemic stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy.一项预测中国急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓治疗患者三个月不良结局概率的 NAC 列线图。
Int J Neurosci. 2021 Feb;131(2):163-169. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2020.1733565. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
5
Factors Associated with 90-Day Outcomes of Patients with Acute Posterior Circulation Stroke Treated By Mechanical Thrombectomy.机械取栓治疗急性后循环卒中患者90天预后的相关因素。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e318-e328. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.171. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion With Mild to Moderate Symptoms.机械取栓治疗轻中度症状急性基底动脉闭塞患者的结局。
Neurology. 2024 Dec 24;103(12):e210086. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210086. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
7
Early and continuous neurologic improvements after intravenous thrombolysis are strong predictors of favorable long-term outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后早期和持续的神经功能改善是长期预后良好的强有力预测指标。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):e590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.024. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
8
Predictive value of fibrinogen levels for 90-day functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.纤维蛋白原水平对急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后90天功能结局的预测价值。
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 May;111:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.02.019. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
9
Creation and Validation of a Stroke Scale to Increase Utility of National Inpatient Sample Administrative Data for Clinical Stroke Research.创建和验证一种中风量表,以提高国家住院患者样本行政数据在临床中风研究中的应用价值。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Apr;30(4):105658. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105658. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
10
MT-DRAGON score for outcome prediction in acute ischemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy within 8 hours.机械取栓治疗 8 小时内急性缺血性脑卒中患者结局预测的 MT-DRAGON 评分。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Mar;12(3):246-251. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015105. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Intravenous alteplase versus tenecteplase in patients with acute posterior circulation strokes: A secondary analysis from the AcT randomized controlled trial.急性后循环卒中患者静脉内使用阿替普酶与替奈普酶的比较:来自 AcT 随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Nov;33(11):107985. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107985. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
A novel prediction score determining individual clinical outcome 3 months after juvenile stroke (PREDICT-score).一种预测青少年脑卒中 3 个月后个体临床结局的新评分(PREDICT 评分)。
J Neurol. 2024 Sep;271(9):6238-6246. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12552-5. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Ischemic stroke outcome prediction with diversity features from whole brain tissue using deep learning network.
使用深度学习网络从全脑组织的多样性特征预测缺血性中风的结果。
Front Neurol. 2024 May 3;15:1394879. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1394879. eCollection 2024.
4
Repeated Measures of Modified Rankin Scale Scores to Assess Functional Recovery From Stroke: AFFINITY Study Findings.重复使用改良 Rankin 量表评分评估卒中后的功能恢复:AFFINITY 研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):e025425. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025425. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions.全球卒中流行病学和急性缺血性卒中干预措施的可及性。
Neurology. 2021 Nov 16;97(20 Suppl 2):S6-S16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781.
6
Standardized Nomenclature for Modified Rankin Scale Global Disability Outcomes: Consensus Recommendations From Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable XI.改良 Rankin 量表全球残疾结局标准化命名:卒中治疗学术产业圆桌会议 XI 的共识推荐意见。
Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(9):3054-3062. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034480. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
8
Selection of patients for intra-arterial treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: development and validation of a clinical decision tool in two randomised trials.急性缺血性卒中动脉内治疗患者的选择:两项随机试验中临床决策工具的开发与验证
BMJ. 2017 May 3;357:j1710. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1710.
9
External Validation of the ASTRAL and DRAGON Scores for Prediction of Functional Outcome in Stroke.用于预测卒中功能结局的ASTRAL和DRAGON评分的外部验证
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1493-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012802. Epub 2016 May 12.
10
Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials.血管内血栓切除术治疗大动脉闭塞性缺血性卒中的Meta 分析:来自五项随机试验的个体患者数据汇总分析
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. Epub 2016 Feb 18.