• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型性别特异性低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程与Friedewald方程、Sampson-NIH方程以及扩展Martin-Hopkins方程在韩国成年人中相对于直接测量法的验证

The Validation of a Novel, Sex-Specific LDL-Cholesterol Equation and the Friedewald, Sampson-NIH, and Extended-Martin-Hopkins Equations Against Direct Measurement in Korean Adults.

作者信息

Yang Hyun Suk, Kim Soo-Nyung, Lee Seungho, Hur Mina

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Metabolites. 2025 Jan 5;15(1):18. doi: 10.3390/metabo15010018.

DOI:10.3390/metabo15010018
PMID:39852361
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11767536/
Abstract

: The currently established equations for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) do not reflect the sex-specific differences in lipid metabolism. We aimed to develop a sex-specific LDLc equation (SSLE) and validate it with three established equations (Friedewald, Sampson-NIH, and ext-Martin-Hopkins) against direct LDLc measurement in Korean adults. This study included 23,757 subjects (51% male; median age, 51 years) from the 2009-2022 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We developed the SSLE through multiple linear regression incorporating total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), triglycerides (TG), and sex. The validation metrics included Bland-Altman analysis for mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and agreement of the categorization based on the NCEP ATP-III guidelines, assessed by sex and lipid subgroups. The derived SSLE equation was as follows: for TG < 200 mg/dL, LDLc = 0.963 × TC - 0.881 × HDLc - 0.111 × TG + 0.982 × Sex - 6.958; for TG ≥ 200 mg/dL, LDLc = 0.884 × TC - 0.646 × HDLc - 0.126 × TG + 3.742 × Sex - 3.214 (male = 1, female = 0). The MAPE was similar between males and females for the SSLE (4.6% for both) and ext-Martin-Hopkins (5.0% vs. 4.9%) but higher in males for the Sampson-NIH (5.4% vs. 4.9%) and Friedewald (7.6% vs. 5.7%). In the TG ≥ 400 mg/dL group, the MAPE increased progressively: SSLE (10.2%), ext-Martin-Hopkins (12.0%), Sampson-NIH (12.7%), and Friedewald (27.4%). In the LDLc < 70 mg/dL group, the MAPE was as follows: SSLE (8.0%), Sampson-NIH (8.6%), ext-Martin-Hopkins (9.7%), and Friedewald (12.8%). At TG 200-400 mg/dL, the SSLE revealed very good agreement (κ = 0.801) versus good agreement for other equations (ext-Martin-Hopkins κ = 0.794, Sampson-NIH κ = 0.782, Friedewald κ = 0.696). The novel SSLE demonstrated superior accuracy and agreement in Korean adults. Further validation studies across different ethnic populations are warranted.

摘要

目前用于计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDLc)的既定公式并未反映出脂质代谢中的性别差异。我们旨在开发一种性别特异性LDLc方程(SSLE),并将其与三个既定公式(Friedewald、Sampson-NIH和ext-Martin-Hopkins)针对韩国成年人的直接LDLc测量值进行验证。本研究纳入了2009 - 2022年韩国国家健康与营养检查调查中的23,757名受试者(51%为男性;中位年龄51岁)。我们通过纳入总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLc)、甘油三酯(TG)和性别的多元线性回归开发了SSLE。验证指标包括基于平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)的Bland-Altman分析以及根据美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗组第三次报告(NCEP ATP-III)指南进行的分类一致性,按性别和脂质亚组进行评估。推导得出的SSLE方程如下:对于TG < 200 mg/dL,LDLc = 0.963 × TC - 0.881 × HDLc - 0.111 × TG + 0.982 × 性别 - 6.958;对于TG ≥ 200 mg/dL,LDLc = 0.884 × TC - 0.646 × HDLc - 0.126 × TG + 3.742 × 性别 - 3.214(男性 = 1,女性 = 0)。SSLE在男性和女性中的MAPE相似(均为4.6%),ext-Martin-Hopkins在男性和女性中的MAPE也相似(分别为5.0%和4.9%),但Sampson-NIH在男性中的MAPE更高(分别为5.4%和4.9%),Friedewald在男性中的MAPE更高(分别为7.6%和5.7%)。在TG ≥ 400 mg/dL组中,MAPE逐渐增加:SSLE为10.2%,ext-Martin-Hopkins为12.0%,Sampson-NIH为12.7%,Friedewald为27.4%。在LDLc < 70 mg/dL组中,MAPE如下:SSLE为8.0%,Sampson-NIH为8.6%,ext-Martin-Hopkins为9.7%,Friedewald为12.8%。在TG 200 - 400 mg/dL时,SSLE显示出非常好的一致性(κ = 0.801),而其他公式显示出良好的一致性(ext-Martin-Hopkins κ = 0.794,Sampson-NIH κ = 0.782,Friedewald κ = 0.696)。新的SSLE在韩国成年人中显示出更高的准确性和一致性。有必要在不同种族人群中进行进一步的验证研究。

相似文献

1
The Validation of a Novel, Sex-Specific LDL-Cholesterol Equation and the Friedewald, Sampson-NIH, and Extended-Martin-Hopkins Equations Against Direct Measurement in Korean Adults.一种新型性别特异性低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程与Friedewald方程、Sampson-NIH方程以及扩展Martin-Hopkins方程在韩国成年人中相对于直接测量法的验证
Metabolites. 2025 Jan 5;15(1):18. doi: 10.3390/metabo15010018.
2
Evaluation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations by cross-platform assessment of accuracy-based EQA data against SI-traceable reference value.基于与 SI 可溯源参考值的准确性的 EQA 数据的跨平台评估来评价 LDL-C 方程。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Apr 4;61(10):1808-1819. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1301. Print 2023 Sep 26.
3
Comparison of Methods to Estimate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With High Triglyceride Levels.比较高甘油三酯血症患者估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128817. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817.
4
Discordance Between Standard Equations for Determination of LDL Cholesterol in Patients With Atherosclerosis.动脉粥样硬化患者 LDL 胆固醇测定的标准方程之间的差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Feb 15;79(6):530-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.042.
5
Calculated LDL-cholesterol: comparability of the extended Martin/Hopkins, Sampson/NIH, Friedewald and four other equations in South African patients.计算 LDL-胆固醇:南非患者中扩展的 Martin/Hopkins、Sampson/NIH、Friedewald 以及其他四个方程的可比性。
J Clin Pathol. 2024 Sep 19;77(10):656-662. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2023-208916.
6
Comparability of 11 different equations for estimating LDL cholesterol on different analysers.比较不同分析仪上 11 种不同 LDL 胆固醇估算方程的可比性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Aug 12;59(12):1930-1943. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0747. Print 2021 Nov 25.
7
Correlation of extended Martin/Hopkins equation with a direct homogeneous assay in assessing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.扩展的 Martin/Hopkins 方程与直接均相法评估高甘油三酯血症患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的相关性。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2023 Sep;37(17-18):e24963. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24963. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
A novel equation for the estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the Saudi Arabian population: a derivation and validation study.沙特阿拉伯人群中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇估算的新方程:推导和验证研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55921-w.
9
Comparative performance of equations to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and cardiovascular disease incidence: The ATTICA study (2002-2022).估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平及心血管疾病发病率的方程的比较性能:阿提卡研究(2002年 - 2022年)
Lipids. 2023 Jul;58(4):159-170. doi: 10.1002/lipd.12371. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
Comparison of Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, and Sampson formulae with direct LDL measurement in hyperlipidaemic and normolipidaemic adults in a Turkish population.在土耳其人群中,对高脂血症和血脂正常的成年人进行Friedewald公式、Martin/Hopkins公式和Sampson公式与直接低密度脂蛋白测量的比较。
J Med Biochem. 2024 Sep 6;43(5):671-680. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-46549.

本文引用的文献

1
ADLM Guidance Document on the Measurement and Reporting of Lipids and Lipoproteins.ADLM 关于血脂和脂蛋白测量及报告的指导文件。
J Appl Lab Med. 2024 Sep 3;9(5):1040-1056. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae057.
2
Direct LDL Cholesterol Assay vs. Estimated Equations in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia or Low LDL Cholesterol Levels.高甘油三酯血症或低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平低的患者中直接低密度脂蛋白胆固醇检测与估算方程的比较
Ann Lab Med. 2024 Jul 1;44(4):363-366. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.0387. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Sex-Specific Relationships between HDL-Cholesterol Levels and 10-Year Mortality in Individuals with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study of South Koreans.
动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平与10年死亡率的性别特异性关系:韩国全国队列研究
Metabolites. 2023 Nov 26;13(12):1175. doi: 10.3390/metabo13121175.
4
Extensive Evidence Supports the Martin-Hopkins Equation as the LDL-C Calculation of Choice.大量证据支持马丁 - 霍普金斯方程作为低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的首选计算方法。
Clin Chem. 2024 Feb 7;70(2):392-398. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad199.
5
The Sampson-NIH Equation Is the Preferred Calculation Method for LDL-C.桑普森-美国国立卫生研究院方程是低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的首选计算方法。
Clin Chem. 2024 Feb 7;70(2):399-402. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad190.
6
Best practice for LDL-cholesterol: when and how to calculate.LDL 胆固醇的最佳实践:何时以及如何计算。
J Clin Pathol. 2023 Mar;76(3):145-152. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208480. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Indirect calculation of LDL using thirteen equations in Pakistani population.采用 13 个方程在巴基斯坦人群中间接计算 LDL。
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Nov 1;536:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Sex, age, and ethnic dependency of lipoprotein variants as the risk factors of ischemic heart disease: a detailed study on the different age-classes and genders in Tehran Cardiometabolic Genetic Study (TCGS).脂蛋白变异作为缺血性心脏病危险因素的性别、年龄和种族依赖性:德黑兰心脏代谢遗传研究(TCGS)中不同年龄和性别的详细研究。
Biol Sex Differ. 2022 Jan 28;13(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13293-022-00413-7.
9
Comparison of Methods to Estimate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With High Triglyceride Levels.比较高甘油三酯血症患者估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128817. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817.
10
Validation of multiple equations for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Korean adults.验证多个用于估算韩国成年人低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的方程。
Lipids Health Dis. 2021 Sep 20;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01525-6.