Moscoso Angie D, Pérez Vera Z, Betancur Manuel J
Facultad de Ingeniería Electrónica, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia.
Sports (Basel). 2025 Jan 2;13(1):4. doi: 10.3390/sports13010004.
This article aims to make a scoping review of Validating Questionnaires used in the field of lower limb (LL) rehabilitation in which systems, devices or exergames are used. Its main objective is to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the results obtained in the validation of questionnaires, as well as to identify specific criteria for evaluating systems, devices or exergames in the area of LL rehabilitation, through the analysis of validating instruments and their application in different associated contexts. The article details the methodology employed, a PRISMA ScR method review which included database research and an evaluation of the selected studies. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select all relevant studies, resulting in 81 studies after initial review based on titles and abstracts. Subsequently, the criteria were again applied to read the full text, resulting in 58 final studies. The document distinguishes between standardized and non-standardized validating questionnaires, emphasizing that standardized validating questionnaires have undergone rigorous statistical processes to ensure their validity, reliability and consistency. The information compiled in the tables provides a solid basis for identifying and evaluating validation questionnaires in the above-mentioned context. This resource constitutes an accurate and reliable reference for selecting the most appropriate instruments for future research and comparisons with similar work. This article is a valuable resource for those interested in the validation of questionnaires used in the field of lower limb rehabilitation systems/devices/exergames.
本文旨在对在下肢(LL)康复领域使用系统、设备或运动游戏的问卷验证进行范围综述。其主要目的是通过分析验证工具及其在不同相关背景下的应用,更全面地了解问卷验证所获得的结果,并确定评估LL康复领域系统、设备或运动游戏的具体标准。文章详细介绍了所采用的方法,即PRISMA ScR方法综述,其中包括数据库研究和对所选研究的评估。应用纳入和排除标准来选择所有相关研究,基于标题和摘要进行初步审查后得到81项研究。随后,再次应用这些标准阅读全文,最终得到58项研究。该文献区分了标准化和非标准化的问卷验证,强调标准化问卷验证经过了严格的统计过程以确保其有效性、可靠性和一致性。表格中汇编的信息为在上述背景下识别和评估验证问卷提供了坚实的基础。该资源为选择最合适的工具用于未来研究以及与类似工作进行比较提供了准确可靠的参考。本文对于那些对下肢康复系统/设备/运动游戏领域使用的问卷验证感兴趣的人来说是一份宝贵的资源。