Suppr超能文献

基于人群的研究中系统性冠状动脉风险评估2(SCORE2)、动脉僵硬度与亚临床冠状动脉粥样硬化

Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), arterial stiffness, and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in a population-based study.

作者信息

Strömberg Susanna, Stomby Andreas, Engvall Jan, Östgren Carl Johan

机构信息

Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Råslätts vårdcentral, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Jun;43(2):455-462. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2456948. Epub 2025 Jan 24.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the association between Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) and subclinical damage in two vascular beds: atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries and aortic arterial stiffness, in a large population-based cohort without cardiovascular disease or diabetes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study based on Swedish CArdio Pulmonary bioImaging Study (SCAPIS) data. A population-based cohort of 3087 participants aged 50-64.

OUTCOME

Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) was measured, and aortic arterial stiffness was defined as PWV≥ 10 m/s. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was determined by coronary computed tomography and clinically significant coronary calcification was defined as CACS > 100.

RESULTS

The prevalence of arterial stiffness was 6.6% in the low-moderate SCORE2 risk group, 31.0% in the high-risk group, and 53.3% in the very high-risk group. The prevalence of coronary calcification was 4.5%, 18.5% 23.0%, respectively. There was a modest overlap between arterial stiffness and coronary calcification in all SCORE2 risk groups. When comparing the high SCORE2 risk group with the low-moderate risk group, the Odds ratio (OR) was 6.4, 95% confidence interval (CI 5.1-8.0) for arterial stiffness and 4.8 (CI 3.7-6.3) for coronary calcification. When comparing the very high SCORE2 risk group to the low-moderate group, the OR was 16.2 (CI 11.3-23.1) for arterial stiffness and 6.4 (CI 4.2-9.7) for coronary calcification.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that high cardiovascular risk according to SCORE2 is associated with increased arterial stiffness and significant coronary calcification in a population without prevalent cardiovascular disease or diabetes. This knowledge can be useful in primary care, where SCORE2 is frequently used as a risk prediction tool. The modest overlap between arterial stiffness and coronary calcification suggests that CACS and PWV describe different types of vascular damage.

摘要

目的

在一个无心血管疾病或糖尿病的大型人群队列中,研究系统性冠状动脉风险评估2(SCORE2)与两个血管床的亚临床损害之间的关联,这两个血管床分别为冠状动脉粥样硬化和主动脉僵硬度。

方法

一项基于瑞典心肺生物成像研究(SCAPIS)数据的横断面研究。一个基于人群的队列,共3087名年龄在50 - 64岁的参与者。

结果

脉搏波速度(PWV)被测量,主动脉僵硬度定义为PWV≥10 m/s。冠状动脉钙化积分(CACS)通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描确定,临床显著冠状动脉钙化定义为CACS>100。

结果

在低 - 中度SCORE2风险组中,动脉僵硬度的患病率为6.6%,高风险组为31.0%,极高风险组为53.3%。冠状动脉钙化的患病率分别为4.5%、18.5%、23.0%。在所有SCORE2风险组中,动脉僵硬度和冠状动脉钙化之间存在适度重叠。当将高SCORE2风险组与低 - 中度风险组进行比较时,动脉僵硬度的优势比(OR)为6.4,95%置信区间(CI 5.1 - 8.0),冠状动脉钙化为4.8(CI 3.7 - 6.3)。当将极高SCORE2风险组与低 - 中度组进行比较时,动脉僵硬度的OR为16.2(CI 11.3 - 23.1),冠状动脉钙化为6.4(CI 4.2 - 9.7)。

结论

我们的研究表明,在无心血管疾病或糖尿病的人群中,根据SCORE2评估的高心血管风险与动脉僵硬度增加和显著冠状动脉钙化相关。这一知识在初级保健中可能有用,在初级保健中SCORE2经常被用作风险预测工具。动脉僵硬度和冠状动脉钙化之间的适度重叠表明CACS和PWV描述了不同类型的血管损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a95f/12090275/60f506cbc407/IPRI_A_2456948_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验