Suppr超能文献

在动脉高血压成人中,Globorisk、SCORE2和PREVENT在心血管风险分层中的比较及其与靶器官损害的关系。

Comparison of Globorisk, SCORE2, and PREVENT in the Stratification of Cardiovascular Risk and its Relationship with End-Organ Damage Among Adults With Arterial Hypertension.

作者信息

Palomo-Piñón Silvia, Alcocer Luis, Álvarez-López Humberto, Cardona-Muñoz Ernesto G, Chávez-Mendoza Adolfo, Díaz-Díaz Enrique, Enciso-Muñoz José Manuel, Galván-Oseguera Héctor, Rosas-Peralta Martin, García-Cortés Luis Rey, Moreno-Noguez Moisés, Antonio-Villa Neftali Eduardo

机构信息

Grupo de Expertos en Hipertensión Arterial México (GREHTA), Ciudad de México, Mexico.

Grupo Colaborativo en Hipertensión Arterial (GCHTA), Ciudad de México, Mexico.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Aug;27(8):e70106. doi: 10.1111/jch.70106.

Abstract

Arterial hypertension often coexists with comorbidities that increase vascular damage. Although the primary goal is to reduce cardiovascular risk, the available risk scores can produce varying estimates. Here, we aim to compare the prevalence of cardiovascular risk categories using three equations (Globorisk, SCORE2, and PREVENT) in adults living with arterial hypertension and to assess their association as stratification tools for end-organ damage (EOD). To achieve this, we performed a cross-sectional sub-analysis of the RIHTA study, an electronic health record-based registry of adults with arterial hypertension in Mexican primary care centers. EOD was defined as aortic stiffness, reduced eGFR, hypertensive retinopathy, peripheral artery disease, or left ventricular hypertrophy. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to evaluate the association between cardiovascular risk and EOD, adjusting for relevant confounders, and areas under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) were calculated to assess detection capacity. Among 4512 participants (median age 64 years; 61% women), EOD was present in 33% (n = 1492). The PREVENT equation yielded the highest median 10-year risk (15%, IQR 8-24), followed by Globorisk laboratory-based (12%, 7-22), Globorisk office-based (11%, 7-19), and SCORE2 (5.06%, 3.86-7.18). In IPW models, each 1% increase in score was associated with higher odds of EOD (PREVENT OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.15-1.17; Globorisk-office 1.09, 1.08-1.10; Globorisk-lab 1.07, 1.06-1.08; SCORE2 1.04, 1.02-1.06). The PREVENT score demonstrated the strongest discrimination for detecting EOD (AUROC: 0.751, 0.735-0.750). These findings suggest that among adults with arterial hypertension, the PREVENT score identifies high-risk individuals and improves discrimination for EOD.

摘要

动脉高血压常与增加血管损伤的合并症并存。尽管主要目标是降低心血管风险,但现有的风险评分可能会产生不同的估计值。在此,我们旨在比较使用三个方程(Globorisk、SCORE2和PREVENT)对患有动脉高血压的成年人进行心血管风险分类的患病率,并评估它们作为终末器官损伤(EOD)分层工具的相关性。为实现这一目标,我们对RIHTA研究进行了横断面亚分析,该研究是基于墨西哥初级保健中心成年动脉高血压患者电子健康记录的登记处。EOD被定义为主动脉僵硬度增加、估算肾小球滤过率降低、高血压视网膜病变、外周动脉疾病或左心室肥厚。使用逆概率加权(IPW)来评估心血管风险与EOD之间的相关性,并对相关混杂因素进行调整,同时计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)以评估检测能力。在4512名参与者中(中位年龄64岁;61%为女性),33%(n = 1492)存在EOD。PREVENT方程得出的10年风险中位数最高(15%,四分位间距8 - 24),其次是基于实验室的Globorisk(12%,7 - 22)、基于诊室的Globorisk(11%,7 - 19)和SCORE2(5.06%,3.86 - 7.18)。在IPW模型中,评分每增加1%与EOD的较高比值相关(PREVENT比值比1.16,95%置信区间1.15 - 1.17;诊室Globorisk 为1.09,1.08 - 1.10;实验室Globorisk为1.07,1.06 - 1.08;SCORE2为1.04,1.02 - 1.06)。PREVENT评分在检测EOD方面表现出最强的辨别力(AUROC:0.751,0.735 - 0.750)。这些发现表明,在患有动脉高血压的成年人中,PREVENT评分可识别高危个体并提高对EOD的辨别力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验